Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 43, Issue 6, pp 940–947 | Cite as

Shame and guilt among ice hockey players in the penalty box

  • Sohad Murrar
  • Naomi Isenberg
  • Paula Niedenthal
  • Markus BrauerEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Shame and guilt proneness are negative emotional dispositions that diverge in their behavioral responses. After a wrongdoing, shame tends to have a maladaptive influence on behavior, and guilt tends to have an adaptive influence on behavior. The current study sought to investigate shame and guilt tendencies among children and adolescents in a real-world context that has all the characteristics to generate these feelings: the hockey penalty box. We surveyed children and adolescent ice hockey players with experience serving time in the penalty box (N = 123). Findings showed that players who were higher in guilt proneness recalled experiencing more guilt-related feelings and cognitions in the penalty box than players lower in guilt proneness. The different cognitions relate to more anticipation of improving their playing. Players higher in shame proneness experienced more shame-related feelings and cognitions than players lower in shame proneness, which was related to more self-blaming. These findings have implications for the development and consequences of prosocial behaviors.

Keywords

Shame proneness Guilt proneness Self-blame Reparative action Development 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from both the participants and their parents.

References

  1. Blunch, N. (2013). Introduction to structural equation modeling using IBM SPSS and AMOS (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Allyn & Bacon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carpenter, T. P., Tignor, S. M., Tsang, J., & Willett, A. (2016). Dispositional self-forgiveness, guilt- and shame-proneness, and the roles of motivational tendencies. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, T. R., Panter, A. T., & Turan, N. (2012). Guilt proneness and moral character. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 355–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, T. R., Wolf, S. T., Panter, A. T., & Insko, C. A. (2011). Introducing the GASP scale: A new measure of guilt and shame proneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 947–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Hooge, I. E., Breugelmans, S. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2008). Not so ugly after all: When shame acts as a commitment device. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 933–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Hooge, I. E., Zeelenberg, M., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2010). Restore and protect motivations following shame. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gausel, N., & Leach, C. W. (2011). Concern for self-image and social image in the management of moral failure: Rethinking shame. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 468–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harder, D. W., & Lewis, S. J. (1987). The assessment of shame and guilt. Advances in Personality Assessment, 6, 89–114.Google Scholar
  9. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lewis, H. B. (1971). Shame and guilt in neurosis. Psychoanalytic Review, 58, 419–4318.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lewis, M. (1992). Shame: The exposed self. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lewis, M., & Ramsay, D. (2004). Development of self-recognition, personal pronoun use, and pretend play during the 2nd year. Child Development, 75, 1821–1831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lindsay-Hartz, J. (1984). Contrasting experiences of shame and guilt. The American Behavioral Scientist (pre-1986), 27, 689–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12, 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Niedenthal, P. M., Tangney, J. P., & Gavanski, I. (1994). “If only I weren’t” versus “If only I hadn’t”: Distinguishing shame and guilt in counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 585–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roos, S., Hodges, E. V. E., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). Do guilt- and shame-proneness differentially predict prosocial, aggressive, and withdrawn behaviors during early adolescents? Developmental Psychology, 50, 941–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shrout, P. E. (2011). Commentary: Mediation analysis, causal process, and cross-sectional data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 852–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stuewig, J., Tangney, J. P., Kendall, S., Folk, J. B., Meyer, C. R., & Dearing, R. L. (2015). Children’s proneness to shame and guilt predict risky and illegal behaviors in young adulthood. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 46, 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tangney, J. P. (1995). Recent empirical advances in the study of shame and guilt. American Behavioral Scientist, 38, 1132–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tangney, J. P., Ferguson, T. J., Wagner, P. E., Crowley, S. L., & Gramzow, R. (1996a). The test of self-conscious affect—2 (TOSCA-2). Fairfax VA: George Mason University.Google Scholar
  26. Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Martinez, A. G. (2014). Two faces of shame: The role of shame and guilt in predicting recidivism. Psychological Science, 25, 799–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P. E., Burggraf, S. A., Gramzow, R., & Fletcher, C. (1990). The test of self-conscious affect for children (TOSCA-C). Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.Google Scholar
  29. Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P. E., Burggraf, S. A., Gramzow, R., & Fletcher, C. (1991a, June). Children’s shame-proneness, but not guilt-proneness, is related to emotional and behavioral maladjustment. Poster presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Society, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
  30. Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P. E., Fletcher, C., & Gramzow, R. (1992a). Shamed into anger? The relation of shame and guilt to anger and self-reported aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 669–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P. E., Gavalas, J., & Gramzow, R. (1991b). The test of self-conscious affect for adolescents (TOSCA-A). Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.Google Scholar
  32. Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P. E., Gavlas, J., Hill, D. A., & Marschall, D. E. (1992b, August). Shame, guilt, and constructive vs. destructive anger. Poster presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  33. Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P. E., & Gramzow, R. (1989). The test of self-conscious affect (TOSCA). Fairfax VA: George Mason University.Google Scholar
  34. Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P. E., Hill-Barlow, D., Marshall, D. E., & Gramzow, R. (1996b). Relation of shame and guilt to constructive versus destructive responses in anger across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 797–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wicker, F. W., Payne, G. C., & Morgan, R. D. (1983). Participant descriptions of guilt and shame. Motivation and Emotion, 7, 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wolf, S. T., Cohen, T. R., Panter, A. T., & Insko, C. A. (2010). Shame proneness and guilt proneness: Toward further understanding of reactions to public and private transgressions. Self and Identity, 9, 337–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Psychology & CounselingGovernors State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations