Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 43, Issue 5, pp 740–757 | Cite as

Women in power-themed tasks: Need for power predicts task enjoyment and power stress

  • Jan HoferEmail author
  • Holger Busch
Original Paper
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

The implicit power motive predicts individuals’ involvement in activities that allow them to have impact and influence on other people. Moreover, substantial evidence indicates that thwarting individuals’ implicit power motive relates to so-called power stress. The present series of studies addresses both topics among female participants. In study 1, findings indicate that the strength of the implicit power motive moderates the relationship between women’s self-reported dominance and their evaluations of a power-related task: A significant link between self-reported dominance and both motivation for task participation and task enjoyment could be verified only when the implicit power motive was well-pronounced. In the subsequent studies, actual and anticipated thwarting of the satisfaction of a strong implicit power motive was associated with different psychological and behavioral indicators of power stress. Participants with a high implicit power motive felt more negative affect (study 2), reported more negative explicit (study 3) and implicit (study 4) attitudes towards a dominant target person, and were coded more often for visible frown reactions (study 5) when the satisfaction of their implicit power motive was (potentially) thwarted compared to participants with a low implicit power motive and participants with a high implicit power motive that was, however, not at risk of being thwarted.

Keywords

Implicit need for power Explicit power motive Power stress Gender 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Baumann, N., Kaschel, R., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Striving for unwanted goals: Stress-dependent discrepancies between explicit and implicit achievement motives reduce subjective well-being and increase psychosomatic symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 781–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brunstein, J. C., Schultheiss, O. C., & Grässmann, R. (1998). Personal goals and emotional well-being: The moderating role of motive dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 494–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, W. G. (1996). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Burklund, L. J., Eisenberger, N. I., & Lieberman, M. D. (2007). The face of rejection: Rejection sensitivity moderates dorsal anterior cingulate activity to disapproving facial expressions. Social Neuroscience, 2, 238–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Côté, S., & Moskowitz, D. S. (1998). On the dynamic covariation between interpersonal behavior and affect: Prediction from neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1032–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crites, S. L., Jr., Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Measuring the affective and cognitive properties of attitudes: Conceptual and methodological issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 619–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Darwin, C. (1962). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: John Murray (originally published in 1872).Google Scholar
  9. Downey, G., & Feldman, S. J. (1996). Implications of rejection-sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1327–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions revealed: Recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
  11. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1978). Facial Action Coding System: A technique for the measurement of facial movement. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Ellsworth, P. (1972). Does the face provide accurate information? In P. Ekman (Ed.), Emotion in the human face (pp. 56–97). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Feldmann-Wüstefeld, T., Schmidt-Daffy, M., & Schubö, A. (2011). Neural evidence for the threat detection advantage: Differential attention allocation to angry and happy faces. Psychophysiology, 48, 697–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fodor, E. M. (1984). The power motive and reactivity to power stresses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 853–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fodor, E. M. (2009). Power motivation. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 426–440). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fodor, E. M. (2010). Power motivation. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 3–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fodor, E. M., & Wick, D. P. (2009). Need for power and affective response to negative audience reaction to an extemporaneous speech. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 721–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fodor, E. M., Wick, D. P., & Conroy, N. E. (2012). Power motivation as an influence on reaction to an imagined feminist dating partner. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fodor, E. M., Wick, D. P., & Hartsen, K. M. (2006). The power motive and affective response to assertiveness. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 598–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hofer, J., Busch, H., Bond, M. H., Campos, D., Li, M., & Law, R. (2010a). Power and sociosexuality in men and women: The pancultural effect of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 380–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hofer, J., Busch, H., Bond, M. H., Li, M., & Law, R. (2010b). Effects of motive-goal congruence on well-being in the power domain: Considering goals and values in a German and two Chinese samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 610–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hofer, J., Busch, H., Chasiotis, A., Kärtner, J., & Campos, D. (2008). Concern for generativity and its relation to implicit pro-social power motivation, generative goals, and satisfaction with life: A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Personality, 76, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hofer, J., & Chasiotis, A. (2003). Congruence of life goals and implicit motives as predictor of life satisfaction: Cross-cultural implications of a study of Zambian male adolescents. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Jenkins, S. R. (1994). Need for power and women’s careers over 14 years: Structural power, job satisfaction, and motive change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson, D. J., & Rusbult, C. E. (1989). Resisting temptation: Devaluation of alternative partners as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 967–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Köllner, M. G., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2014). Meta-analytic evidence of low convergence between implicit and explicit measures of the needs for achievement, affiliation, and power. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 826.Google Scholar
  33. LoBue, V., & Larson, C. L. (2010). What makes an angry face look so … angry? Examining visual attention to the shape of threat in children and adults. Visual Cognition, 18, 1165–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McClelland, D. C. (1970). The two faces of power. Journal of International Affairs, 24, 29–47.Google Scholar
  35. McClelland, D. C. (1975). Power: The inner experience. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  36. McClelland, D. C. (1976). Sources of stress in the drive for power. In G. Serban (Ed.), Psychopathology and human adaptation (pp. 247–270). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McClelland, D. C., & Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). Leadership motive pattern and long-term success in management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 737–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McClelland, D. C., & Burnham, D. H. (1976). Power is the great motivator. Harvard Business Review, 54, 100–110.Google Scholar
  39. McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morgan, C. D., & Murray, H. H. (1935). A method for investigating fantasies: The thematic apperception test. Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 34, 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Öhman, A. (2002). Automaticity and the amygdala: Nonconscious responses to emotional faces. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 62–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pulido-Martos, M., Lopez-Zafra, E., & Augusto-Landa, J. M. (2013). Perceived emotional intelligence and its relationship with perceptions of effectiveness in negotiation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 408–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2005). Kurzversion des Big FiveInventory (BFI-K): Entwicklung und Validierung eines ökonomischen Inventars zur Erfassung der fünf Faktoren der Persönlichkeit. Diagnostica, 51, 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Russell, B. (1938). Power: A new social analysis. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  45. Schönbrodt, F. D., & Gerstenberg, F. X. R. (2012). An IRT analysis of motive questionnaires: The Unified Motive Scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 725–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schultheiss, O. C., & Brunstein, J. C. (Eds.). (2010). Implicit motives. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Schultheiss, O. C., & Hale, J. A. (2007). Implicit motives modulate attentional orienting to perceived facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schultheiss, O. C., Jones, N. M., Davis, A. Q., & Kley, C. (2008). The role of implicit motivation in hot and cold goal pursuit: Effects on goal progress, goal rumination, and depressive symptoms. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 971–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sims, C. M. (2017). Do the Big-Five personality traits predict empathic listening and assertive communication? International Journal of Listening, 31, 163–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith, C. P. (Ed.). (1992). Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, M., Cottrell, G., Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. (2005). Transmitting and decoding facial expressions. Psychological Science, 16, 184–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, C. P., Feld, S. C., & Franz, C. E. (1992). Methodological considerations: Steps in research employing content analysis systems. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 515–536). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stewart, A. J., & Winter, D. G. (1976). Arousal of the power motive in women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 495–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stumpf, H., Angleitner, A., Wieck, T., Jackson, D. N., & Beloch-Till, H. (1985). Deutsche Personality Research Form (PRF) (German Personality Research Form). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  55. Võ, M. L. H., Conrad, M., Kuchinke, L., Urton, K., Hofmann, M. J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). The Berlin Affective Word List Reloaded (BAWL-R). Behavior Research Methods, 41, 534–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wiemers, U. S., Schultheiss, O. C., & Wolf, O. T. (2015). Public speaking in front of an unreceptive audience increases implicit power motivation and its endocrine arousal signature. Hormones and Behavior, 71, 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wigboldus, D. H. J., Holland, R. W., & van Knippenberg, A. (2004). Single target implicit associations. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  58. Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  59. Winter, D. G. (1994). Manual for scoring motive imagery in running text. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  60. Winter, D. G., & Stewart, A. J. (1978). The power motive. In H. London & J. E. Exner (Eds.), Dimensions of personality (pp. 391–447). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Developmental PsychologyTrier UniversityTrierGermany

Personalised recommendations