Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 43, Issue 5, pp 719–739 | Cite as

Lay beliefs about competition: Scale development and gender differences

  • Selin KesebirEmail author
  • Sun Young Lee
  • Andrew J. Elliot
  • Madan M. Pillutla
Original Paper

Abstract

Women are less competitive than men in most contexts studied. This difference has been linked to the gender gap in socio-economic outcomes. To examine whether this gender difference is linked to differential beliefs about competition, we developed a scale measuring lay beliefs about competition and tested whether these beliefs account for gender differences in competitive attitudes and behaviors. A mini meta-analysis (N = 2331) of responses to this scale shows that men attribute more positive outcomes to competition than women. In particular, men are more likely to believe that competition improves performance, builds character, and leads to creative problem-solving. In contrast, the gender differences are smaller, less robust, and inconsistent for the different negative outcomes attributed to competition, such as encouraging unethical behavior, hurting self-esteem, and damaging relationships. We also show in two studies that only positive lay beliefs about competition predict competitive attitudes and behaviors, and account for (some of) the gender difference in competitiveness. We discuss possible reasons that women and men hold different beliefs about competition and the implications of these differences for the optimal design of social and organizational structures.

Keywords

Competitiveness Gender Lay theories Gender gap 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dan Cable and Michael Parke for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

  1. Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4(2), 139–158.Google Scholar
  2. Ahlgren, A., & Johnson, D. W. (1979). Sex differences in cooperative and competitive attitudes from the 2nd through the 12th grades. Developmental Psychology, 15(1), 45–49.Google Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I. (2012). The theory of planned behavior. In P. A. M. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 438–459). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Almås, I., Cappelen, A. W., Salvanes, K. G., Sørensen, E. Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2016). Willingness to compete: Family matters. Management Science, 62, 2149–2162.Google Scholar
  5. Andersen, S., Ertac, S., Gneezy, U., List, J. A., & Maximiano, S. (2013). Gender, competitiveness, and socialization at a young age: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95, 1438–1443.Google Scholar
  6. Arbuckle, J. L. (2014). Amos (Version 23.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: IBM SPSS.Google Scholar
  7. Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113–125.Google Scholar
  8. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Gupta, R. (2003). Meta-analysis of the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and Holland’s occupational types. Personnel Psychology, 56(1), 45–74.Google Scholar
  9. Bays, J., Goland, T., & Newsum, J. (2009, July). Using prizes to spur innovation. McKinsey Quarterly. Retrieved January 29, 2018, from http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/using-prizes-to-spur-innovation.
  10. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.Google Scholar
  11. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.Google Scholar
  12. Bönte, W., & Piegeler, M. (2013). Gender gap in latent and nascent entrepreneurship: Driven by competitiveness. Small Business Economics, 41, 961–987.Google Scholar
  13. Booth, A., & Nolen, P. (2012). Choosing to compete: How different are girls and boys? Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 81, 542–555.Google Scholar
  14. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Bosquet, C., Combes, P.-P., & García-Peñalosa, C. (2017). Gender and promotions: Evidence from academic economists in France. Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Paper, No 1511.Google Scholar
  16. Brooks, A. W. (2014). Get excited: Reappraising pre-performance anxiety as excitement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1144–1158.Google Scholar
  17. Burnette, J. L., & Finkel, E. J. (2012). Buffering against weight gain following dieting setbacks: An implicit theory intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 721–725.Google Scholar
  18. Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 655–701.Google Scholar
  19. Buser, T. (2016). The impact of losing in a competition on the willingness to seek further challenges. Management Science, 62(12), 3439–3449.Google Scholar
  20. Buser, T., Niederle, M., & Oosterbeek, H. (2014). Gender, competitiveness and career choices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129, 1409–1447.Google Scholar
  21. Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(1), 3–25.Google Scholar
  22. Campell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.Google Scholar
  23. Choi, D., Oh, I.-S., & Colbert, A. E. (2015). Understanding organizational commitment: A meta-analytic examination of the roles of the five-factor model of personality and culture. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1542–1567.Google Scholar
  24. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Crum, A. J., Salovey, P., & Achor, S. (2013). Rethinking stress: The role of mindsets in determining the stress response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 716–733.Google Scholar
  26. Datta Gupta, N., Poulsen, A., & Villeval, M. C. (2013). Gender matching and competitiveness: Experimental evidence. Economic Inquiry, 51, 816–835.Google Scholar
  27. Dennehy, J. (2012). Competition, gender and management: Beyond winning and losing. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–151.Google Scholar
  29. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  30. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54(6), 408–423.Google Scholar
  31. Eccles, J. S., & Harold, R. D. (1991). Gender differences in sport involvement: Applying the Eccles’ expectancy-value model. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 3, 7–35.Google Scholar
  32. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.Google Scholar
  33. Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). The need for competence. In E. Deci & R. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination theory (pp. 361–387). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  34. Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. E. (2000). Theories of gender in organizations: A new approach to organizational analysis and change. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 103–151.Google Scholar
  35. Fischer, K. W., Knight, C. C., & Van Parys, M. (1993). Analyzing diversity in developmental pathways: Methods and concepts. In R. Case & W. Edelstein (Eds.), The new structuralism in cognitive development: Theory and research on individual pathways (pp. 33–56). Basel: S. Karger.Google Scholar
  36. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1974). Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 81, 59–75.Google Scholar
  37. Fletcher, T. D., & Nusbaum, D. N. (2010). Development of the Competitive Work Environment Scale: A multidimensional climate construct. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(1), 105–124.Google Scholar
  38. Flory, J. A., Leibbrandt, A., & List, J. A. (2014). Do competitive workplaces deter female workers? A large-scale natural field experiment on job-entry decisions. Review of Economic Studies, 82, 122–155.Google Scholar
  39. Garcia, S. M., Tor, A., & Schiff, T. M. (2013). The psychology of competition a social comparison perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 634–650.Google Scholar
  40. Geary, D. C. (2010). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  41. Gill, D. L., & Deeter, T. E. (1988). Development of the sport orientation questionnaire. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59, 191–202.Google Scholar
  42. Gill, D. L., & Prowse, V. (2014). Gender differences and dynamics in competition: The role of luck. Quantitative Economics, 5, 351–376.Google Scholar
  43. Gneezy, U., Leonard, K. L., & List, J. A. (2009). Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica, 77, 1637–1664.Google Scholar
  44. Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., & Rustichini, A. (2003). Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1049–1073.Google Scholar
  45. Goh, J. X., Hall, J. A., & Rosenthal, R. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 535–549.Google Scholar
  46. Gorodnichenko, Y., & Roland, G. (2011). Which dimensions of culture matter for long-run growth? American Economic Review, 101, 492–498.Google Scholar
  47. Hafer, C. L., & Bègue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 128–167.Google Scholar
  48. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  49. Hayward, R. D., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2007). How competition is viewed across cultures: A test of four theories. Cross-Cultural Research, 41(4), 364–395.Google Scholar
  50. Helmreich, R. L., & Spence, J. T. (1978). The Work and Family Orientation Questionnaire: An objective instrument to assess components of achievement motivation and attitudes toward family and career. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 8(2), 35 (MS #1677).Google Scholar
  51. Horney, K. (1937). The neurotic personality of our time. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  52. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.Google Scholar
  53. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592.Google Scholar
  55. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
  56. Job, V., Dweck, C. S., & Walton, G. M. (2010). Ego depletion—Is it all in your head? Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation. Psychological Science, 21, 1686–1693.Google Scholar
  57. Johnson, D. W., & Norem-Hebeisen, A. A. (1979). A measure of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 109, 253–261.Google Scholar
  58. Jost, J. T., Ledgerwood, A., & Hardin, C. D. (2008). Shared reality, system justification, and the relational basis of ideological beliefs. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 171–186.Google Scholar
  59. Judge, T., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. (2007). Personality and career success. In H. Gunz & M. Peiperl (Eds.), Handbook of career studies (pp. 59–78). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  60. Jury, M., Aelenei, C., Chen, C., Darnon, C., & Elliot, A. J. (2019). Examining the role of perceived prestige in the link between students’ subjective socioeconomic status and sense of belonging. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219827361.Google Scholar
  61. Kanthak, K., & Woon, J. (2015). Women don’t run? Election aversion and candidate entry. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 595–612.Google Scholar
  62. Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Peach, J. M., Friesen, J., Laurin, K., Zanna, M. P., et al. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to view what is as what should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 421–434.Google Scholar
  63. Kirsch, I. (Ed.). (1999). How expectancies shape experience. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  64. Kleinjans, K. J. (2009). Do gender differences in preferences for competition matter for occupational expectations? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 701–710.Google Scholar
  65. Kohn, A. (1992). No contest: The case against competition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  66. Korn, R., Daumiller, M., & Elliot, A. J. (2019). Back to the roots: Achievement goal standards and standpoints. Learning and Individual Differences, 72, 92–102.Google Scholar
  67. Kray, L. J., & Haselhuhn, M. (2007). Implicit theories of negotiating ability and performance: Longitudinal and experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 49–64.Google Scholar
  68. Lee, S. Y., Kesebir, S., & Pillutla, M. M. (2016). Gender differences in response to competition with same-gender coworkers: A relational perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(6), 869–886.Google Scholar
  69. Lee, S., Niederle, M., & Kang, N. (2014). Do single-sex schools make girls more competitive? Economics Letters, 124, 474–477.Google Scholar
  70. Leith, S. A., Ward, C. L. P., Giacomin, M., Landau, E. S., Ehrlinger, J., & Wilson, A. E. (2014). Changing theories of change: Strategies shifting in implicit theories endorsement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 597–620.Google Scholar
  71. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  72. Lever, J. (1978). Sex differences in the complexity of children’s play and games. American Sociological Review, 43, 471–483.Google Scholar
  73. Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1421–1436.Google Scholar
  74. Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2001). Elements of a lay theory of groups: Types of groups, relational styles, and the perception of group entitativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2), 129–140.Google Scholar
  75. Lynn, R. (1993). Sex differences in competitiveness and the valuation of money in twenty countries. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 507–511.Google Scholar
  76. Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513–520.Google Scholar
  77. Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (1997). The folk concept of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(2), 101–121.Google Scholar
  78. Mayr, U., Wozniak, D., Davidson, C., Kuhns, D., & Harbaugh, W. (2012). Competitiveness across the life span: The feisty fifties. Psychology and Aging, 27, 278–285.Google Scholar
  79. Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Finding “meaning” in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist, 61(3), 192–203.Google Scholar
  80. Morin, L. P. (2015). Do men and women respond differently to competition? Evidence from a major education reform. Journal of Labor Economics, 33, 443–491.Google Scholar
  81. Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 949–971.Google Scholar
  82. Nicholson, N. (2000). Managing the human animal. London: Texere Publishing.Google Scholar
  83. Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2010). Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: The role of competition. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 129–144.Google Scholar
  84. Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2011). Gender and competition. Annual Review of Economics, 3, 601–630.Google Scholar
  85. Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1996). Expectancies. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 211–238). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  86. Ors, E., Palomino, F., & Peyrache, E. (2013). Performance gender gap: Does competition matter?. Journal of Labor Economics, 31, 443–499.Google Scholar
  87. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.Google Scholar
  88. Preece, J., & Stoddard, O. (2015). Why women don’t run: Experimental evidence on gender differences in political competition aversion. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 117, 296–308.Google Scholar
  89. Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 160–164.Google Scholar
  90. Price, J. (2008). Gender differences in the response to competition. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 61, 320–333.Google Scholar
  91. Reuben, E., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2015). Taste for competition and the gender gap among young business professionals. NBER Working Paper, No. 21695.Google Scholar
  92. Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98–131.Google Scholar
  93. Ryckman, R. M., Hammer, M., Kaczor, L. M., & Gold, J. A. (1990). Construction of a hypercompetitive attitude scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(3–4), 630–639.Google Scholar
  94. Ryckman, R. M., Hammer, M., Kaczor, L. M., & Gold, J. A. (1996). Construction of a personal development competitive attitude scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(2), 374–385.Google Scholar
  95. Schneider, B. H., Benenson, J. F., Fülöp, M., Berkics, M., & Sándor, M. (2011). Cooperation and competition. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (2nd ed., pp. 472–490). London: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  96. Schneider, B. H., Woodburn, S. S., del Toro, P. S., & Udvari, S. J. (2005). Cultural and gender differences in the implications of competition for early adolescent friendship. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 51, 163–191.Google Scholar
  97. Smither, R. D., & Houston, J. M. (1992). The nature of competitiveness: The development and validation of the competitiveness index. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 407–418.Google Scholar
  98. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1983). Achievement-related motives and behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 10–74). San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  99. Stevenson, A., & White, M. (2011). Concise Oxford English dictionary (12th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  100. Sutter, M., & Glätzle-Rützler, D. (2014). Gender differences in the willingness to compete emerge early in life and persist. Management Science, 61, 2339–2354.Google Scholar
  101. Tamir, M., John, O. P., Srivastava, S., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Implicit theories of emotion: Affective and social outcomes across a major life transition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 731–744.Google Scholar
  102. Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1998). The naive scientist revisited: Naive theories and social judgment. Social Cognition, 16(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
  103. Weinberg, R. S., Gould, D., Yukelson, D., & Jackson, A. (1981). The effect of preexisting and manipulated self-efficacy on a competitive muscular endurance task. Journal of Sport Psychology, 3, 345–354.Google Scholar
  104. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.Google Scholar
  105. Weisfeld, C. C. (1986). Female behaviour in mixed-sex competition: A review of the literature. Developmental Review, 6, 278–299.Google Scholar
  106. Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8(1), 84–136.Google Scholar
  107. Wilson, A. E., & English, J. A. (2017). The motivated fluidity of lay theories of change. In C. M. Zedelius, B. C. N. Müller, & J. W. Schooler (Eds.), The science of lay theories: How beliefs shape our cognition, behavior, and health (pp. 17–43). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  108. Woods, S. A., & Hampson, S. E. (2010). Predicting adult occupational environments from gender and childhood personality traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1045–1057.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Organisational Behaviour Subject AreaLondon Business SchoolLondonUK
  2. 2.UCL School of ManagementUniversity College London (UCL)LondonUK
  3. 3.Department of Clinical and Social PsychologyUniversity of RochesterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations