Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 43, Issue 6, pp 971–984 | Cite as

Predicting with your head, not your heart: Forecasting errors and the impact of anticipated versus experienced elements of regret on well-being

  • Tonya M. BuchananEmail author
  • Joshua Buchanan
  • Kylie R. Kadey
Original Paper

Abstract

Research suggests that when predicting our future emotions, affective forecasting errors are frequent (Wilson and Gilbert in Adv Exp Soc Psychol 35:345–411, 2003), influence motivation (Wilson and Gilbert in Curr Dir Psychol Sci 14:131–134, 2005), and drive decisions and behaviors (Dunn and Laham Affective forecasting: a user’s guide to emotional time travel, Psychology Press, London, 2006). Regret can fall prey to these same errors (Gilbert et al., in Psychol Sci 15:346–350, 2004). Recent research characterizes two distinct components of regret: an affective element and cognitive element associated with maladaptive and functional outcomes, respectively (Buchanan et al., in Judgment and Decision Making 11:275–286, 2006). We explored forecasting of these elements across two studies. In Study 1, we investigated how accurately individuals forecast each component of regret, and how this relates to well-being. Participants forecasted experiencing a greater amount of regret (including affective and cognitive components) than they actually experienced. Additionally, forecasted (compared to experienced) components of regret uniquely predicted well-being outcomes, suggesting that predicting more affective regret coincides with lower well-being. In Study 2, forecasting errors in overall regret were eliminated by asking participants to focus on cognitive elements of regret prior to forecasting.

Keywords

Regret Affective forecasting Emotion Well-being Motivation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

Tonya M. Buchanan declares that she has no conflict of interest. Joshua Buchanan declares that he has no conflict of interest. Kylie Kadey declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Alahmadi, S., Buttrick, N. R., Gilbert, D. T., Hardin, A. M., Westgate, E. C., & Wilson, T. D. (2017). You can do it if you really try: The effects of motivation on thinking for pleasure. Motivation and Emotion, 41, 545–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Nathan DeWall, C., & Zhang, L. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 167–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernstein, M. J., Sacco, D. F., Young, S. G., Hugenberg, K., & Cook, E. (2010). Being “in” with the in-crowd: The effects of social exclusion and inclusion are enhanced by the perceived essentialism of ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 999–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, C. M., & McConnell, A. R. (2011). Discrepancy-based and anticipated emotions in behavioral self-regulation. Emotion, 11(5), 1091–1095.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021756.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchanan, T. M., & McConnell, A. R. (2016). Family as a source of support under stress: Perceptions of family and breadth of inclusion. Self and Identity, 16(1), 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchanan, J., Summerville, A., Lehmann, J., & Reb, J. (2016). The regret elements scale: Distinguishing the affective and cognitive components of regret. Judgment and Decision Making, 11, 275–286.Google Scholar
  7. Buehler, R., & McFarland, C. (2001). Intensity bias in affective forecasting: The role of temporal focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1480–1493.  https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conner, M., Sandberg, T., McMillan, B., & Higgins, A. (2006). Role of anticipated regret, intentions and intention stability in adolescent smoking initiation. British Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., et al. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunn, E. W., & Laham, S. M. (2006). Affective forecasting: A user’s guide to emotional time travel. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dunn, E. W., Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Location, location, location: The misprediction of satisfaction in housing lotteries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1421–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Exline, J. J., Deshea, L., & Holeman, V. T. (2007). Is apology worth the risk? Predictors, outcomes and ways to avoid regret. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 479–504.  https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2007.26.4.479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 302–329). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gilbert, D. T., Driver-Linn, E., & Wilson, T. D. (2002). The trouble with Vronsky: Impact bias in the forecasting of future affective states. In L. F. Barrett & P. Salovey (Eds.), Emotions and social behavior. The wisdom in feeling: Psychological processes in emotional intelligence (pp. 114–143). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gilbert, D. T., & Ebert, J. E. (2002). Decisions and revisions: The affective forecasting of changeable outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 503–514.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.4.503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilbert, D. T., Morewedge, C. K., Risen, J. L., & Wilson, T. D. (2004). Looking forward to looking backward: The misprediction of regret. Psychological Science, 15, 346–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (1995). The experience of regret: What, when, and why. Psychological Review, 102, 379–395.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.379.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H., & Chen, S. (1995). Commission, omission, and dissonance reduction: Coping with regret in the” Monty Hall” problem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 182–190.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295212008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Granberg, D., & Brown, T. A. (1995). The Monty Hall dilemma. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 711–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Larrick, R. P., & Boles, T. L. (1995). Avoiding regret in decisions with feedback: A negotiation example. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 87–97.  https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leunissen, J. M., de Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Reinders Folmer, C. P. (2014). Forecasting errors in the averseness of apologizing. Social Justice Research, 27(3), 322–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levine, L. J., Lench, H. C., Kaplan, R. L., & Safer, M. A. (2012). Accuracy and artifact: Reexamining the intensity bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 584–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Linville, P. W. (1987). Self-complexity as a cognitive buffer against stress-related illness and depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 663–676.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.663.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Loewenstein, G., & Schkade, D. (1999). Wouldn’t it be nice? Predicting future feelings. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 85–105). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  28. Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McConnell, A. R., Brown, C. M., Shoda, T. M., Stayton, L. E., & Martin, C. E. (2011). Friends with benefits: On the positive consequences of pet ownership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1239–1252.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024506.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. McConnell, A. R., Renaud, J. M., Dean, K. K., Green, S. P., Lamoreaux, M. J., Hall, C. E., et al. (2005). Whose self is it anyway? Self-aspect control moderates the relation between self-complexity and well-being. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(1), 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morrison, M., Epstude, K., & Roese, N. J. (2012). Life regrets and the need to belong. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 675–681.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611435137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Petrocelli, J. V., & Harris, A. K. (2011). Learning inhibition in the Monty Hall problem: The role of dysfunctional counterfactual prescriptions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1297–1311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roese, N. J., Epstude, K., Fessel, F., Morrison, M., Smallman, R., Summerville, A., et al. (2009). Repetitive regret, depression, and anxiety: Findings from a nationally representative survey. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 671–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sandberg, T., & Conner, M. (2008). Anticipated regret as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 589–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shimanoff, S. B. (1984). Commonly named emotions in everyday conversations. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58(2), 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Simonson, I. (1992). The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 105–118.  https://doi.org/10.1086/209290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smallman, R., & Roese, N. J. (2009). Counterfactual thinking facilitates behavioral intentions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 845–852.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1991). The mood and anxiety symptom questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Iowa, Department of Psychology, Iowa City.Google Scholar
  40. Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 345–411.Google Scholar
  41. Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 131–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilson, T. D., Wheatley, T. P., Meyers, J. M., Gilbert, D. T., & Axsom, D. (2000). Focalism: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 821–836.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.821.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Woodzicka, J. A., & LaFrance, M. (2001). Real versus imagined gender harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Woolfolk, R. L., Novalany, J., Gara, M. A., Allen, L. A., & Polino, M. (1995). Self-complexity, self-evaluation, and depression: An examination of form and content within the self-schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6), 1108–1120.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Zadro, L., Williams, K. D., & Richardson, R. (2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer inssufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 560–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zeelenberg, M. (1999). Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(2), 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2007). A theory of regret regulation 1.0. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 3–18.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1701_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, W. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Reconsidering the relation between regret and responsibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 254–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCentral Washington UniversityEllensburgUSA

Personalised recommendations