Moral self-judgment is stronger for future than past actions
When, if ever, would a person want to be held responsible for his or her choices? Across four studies (N = 915), people favored more extreme rewards and punishments for their future than their past actions. This included thinking that they should receive more blame and punishment for future misdeeds than for past ones, and more credit and reward for future good deeds than for past ones. The tendency to moralize the future more than the past was mediated by anticipating (one’s own) emotional reactions and concern about one’s reputation, which was stronger in the future as well. The findings fit the pragmatic view that people moralize the future partly to guide their choices and actions, such as by increasing their motivation to restrain selfish impulses and build long-term cooperative relationships with others. People typically believe that the future is open and changeable, while the past is not. We conclude that the psychology of moral accountability has a strong future component.
KeywordsMorality Self-judgment Prospection Emotion Reputation
This work was partly supported by the Norway-America Association (NORAM), and the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence Scheme, FAIR Project No 262675. Data and materials for all four studies are openly available online: https://www.osf.io/z95rm.
- Balcetis, E., & Cardenas, A. (2018).Visual experience in self and social judgment: How a biased majority claim a superior minority. Self and Identity. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2018.1466724.
- Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Escaping the self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences Lawrence Earlbaum Associates (pp. 20–26). NJ: Hillsdale.Google Scholar
- Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions: Studies in emotion and social (interaction ed.). de La: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. New York: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
- Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Sjåstad, H. (2019). Short-sighted greed? Focusing on the future promotes reputation-based generosity. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(2), 199–213.Google Scholar
- Suddendorf, T. (2013). The gap: The science of what separates us from other animals. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1985). A theory of action identification. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar