Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 648–661 | Cite as

The effect of malicious envy on the framing effect: The mediating role of fear of failure

  • Xi Kang
  • Baoshan ZhangEmail author
  • Yanling BiEmail author
  • Xiaoxiao Huang
Original Paper

Abstract

Extensive research has confirmed that negative emotions play a key role in the framing effect. Yet little is known about whether and how malicious envy modulates the framing effect. To examine the potential impact and mechanism of malicious envy on the framing effect, two experiments were conducted in which participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: a malicious envy condition and a control condition. In Experiment 1, after malicious envy was activated and measured, the participants were asked to complete a framing task. The results showed that participants in the malicious envy group made more risk-averse choices in the gain frame than those in the control group, but these two groups of participants did not exhibit a behavioral difference in the loss frame. In Experiment 2, the procedure was identical to Experiment 1, except that, after the malicious envy scale was administered, two scales were used to measure hope for success and fear of failure. Experiment 2 revealed the same effect of malicious envy on decision making in the framing task. Experiment 2 also found that malicious envy activated two types of achievement motivation. Further, fear of failure mediated the effect of malicious envy on risky decision making in the framing task, while hope for success did not mediate the effect. The relationships between malicious envy, framing effect, and achievement motivation have important implications with respect to interventions for malicious envy.

Keywords

Malicious envy Risky decision making The framing effect Fear of failure Mediation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Research Program Funds of the Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality at Beijing Normal University (2018-05-017-BZPK01). The authors would like to thank Rhoda Perozzi and Edmund Perozzi. For English editing assistance on this paper.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the local institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all the individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64(6), 359–372.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, J. W., & Feather, N. T. (Eds.). (1966). A theory of achievement motivation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Baumel, A., & Berant, E. (2015). The role of attachment styles in malicious envy. Journal of Research in Personality, 55, 1–9.Google Scholar
  4. Belk, R. (2011). Benign envy. AMS Review, 1(3), 117–134.Google Scholar
  5. Birney, R. C., Burdick, H., & Teevan, R. C. (1969). Fear of failure. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  6. Brendl, C. M., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Principles of judging valence: What makes events positive or negative? In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 95–160). Berkeley, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383.Google Scholar
  8. Carlson, S. M., Zayas, V., & Guthormsen, A. (2009). Neural correlates of decision making on a gambling task. Child Development, 80(4), 1076–1096.Google Scholar
  9. Cassotti, M., Habib, M., Poirel, N., Aïte, A., Houdé, O., & Moutier, S. (2012). Positive emotional context eliminates the framing effect in decision-making. Emotion, 12(5), 926–931.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen-charash, Y., & Mueller, J. S. (2007). Does perceived unfairness exacerbate or mitigate interpersonal counterproductive work behaviors related to envy? Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 666–680.Google Scholar
  11. Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Crusius, J., & Lange, J. (2014). What catches the envious eye? Attentional biases within malicious and benign envy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 1–11.Google Scholar
  13. Crusius, J., & Lange, J. (2017). How do people respond to threatened social status? Moderators of benign versus malicious envy. In R. H. Smith, U. Merlone, & M. K. Duffy (Eds.), Envy at work and in organizations: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 85–110). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313(5787), 684–687.Google Scholar
  15. Druckman, J. N., & McDermott, R. (2008). Emotion and the framing of risky choice. Political Behavior, 30(3), 297–321.Google Scholar
  16. Duffy, M. K., & Shaw, J. D. (2000). The salieri syndrome. Small Group Research, 31(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
  17. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169–189.Google Scholar
  18. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218–232.Google Scholar
  19. Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). The need for competence. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 361–387). Rochester, New York: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  20. Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2004). The intergenerational transmission of fear of failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(8), 957–971.Google Scholar
  21. Ellsworth, P. C., & Smith, C. A. (1988). From appraisal to emotion: Differences among unpleasant feelings. Motivation and Emotion, 12(3), 271–302.Google Scholar
  22. Falcon, R. G. (2015). Is envy categorical or dimensional? An empirical investigation using taxometric analysis. Emotion, 15(6), 694–698.Google Scholar
  23. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.Google Scholar
  24. Fiske, S. T. (2010). Envy up, scorn down: How comparison divides us. American Psychologist, 65(8), 698–706.Google Scholar
  25. Foster, G. M. (1972). The anatomy of envy: A study in symbolic behavior. Current Anthropology, 13(2), 165–202.Google Scholar
  26. Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2009). The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 142–155.Google Scholar
  27. Habib, M., Cassotti, M., Moutier, S., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2015). Fear and anger have opposite effects on risk seeking in the gain frame. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 1–7.Google Scholar
  28. Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
  29. Heckhausen, H. (1967). The anatomy of achievement motivation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300.Google Scholar
  31. Jeon, M., Yim, J. B., & Walker, B. N. (2011). An angry driver is not the same as a fearful driver: Effects of specific negative emotions on risk perception, driving performance, and workload. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, USA (pp. 137–142).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2381416.2381438.
  32. Kühberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75(1), 23–55.Google Scholar
  33. Kwon, M., Han, Y., & Nam, M. (2017). Envy takes you further: The influence of benign envy on risk taking. Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal, 45(1), 39–50.Google Scholar
  34. Lange, J., Blatz, L., & Crusius, J. (2018a). Dispositional envy: A conceptual review. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Handbook of personality and individual differences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  35. Lange, J., & Crusius, J. (2015a). The tango of two deadly sins: The social-functional relation of envy and pride. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 453–472.Google Scholar
  36. Lange, J., & Crusius, J. (2015b). Dispositional envy revisited: Unraveling the motivational dynamics of benign and malicious envy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(2), 284–294.Google Scholar
  37. Lange, J., Crusius, J., & Hagemeyer, B. (2016). The evil queen’s dilemma: Linking narcissistic admiration and rivalry to benign and malicious envy. European Journal of Personality, 30(2), 168–188.Google Scholar
  38. Lange, J., Paulhus, D. L., & Crusius, J. (2018b). Elucidating the dark side of envy: Distinctive links of benign and malicious envy with dark personalities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(4), 601–614.Google Scholar
  39. Lange, J., Weidman, A. C., & Crusius, J. (2018c). The painful duality of envy: Evidence for an integrative theory and a meta-analysis on the relation of envy and schadenfreude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(4), 572–578.Google Scholar
  40. Lens, W., & Decruyenaere, M. (1991). Motivation and de-motivation in secondary education: Student characteristics. Learning and Instruction, 1(2), 145–159.Google Scholar
  41. Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–159.Google Scholar
  42. Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 854–864.Google Scholar
  43. Ma, Q., Pei, G., & Wang, K. (2015). Influence of negative emotion on the framing effect: Evidence from event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 26(6), 325–332.Google Scholar
  44. Maner, J. K., & Gerend, M. A. (2007). Motivationally selective risk judgments: Do fear and curiosity boost the boons or the banes? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 256–267.Google Scholar
  45. Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2003). Fear of failure: Friend or foe? Australian Psychologist, 38(1), 31–38.Google Scholar
  46. McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.Google Scholar
  47. Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 351–373.Google Scholar
  48. Miceli, M., & Castelfranchi, C. (2007). The envious mind. Cognition and Emotion, 21(3), 449–479.Google Scholar
  49. Parks, C. D., Rumble, A. C., & Posey, D. C. (2002). The effects of envy on reciprocation in a social dilemma. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(4), 509–520.Google Scholar
  50. Powell, M., & Ansic, D. (1997). Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(6), 605–628.Google Scholar
  51. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), 717–731.Google Scholar
  52. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.Google Scholar
  53. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.Google Scholar
  54. Ricci, F., & Scafarto, V. (2016). Malicious envy in the workplace and intangible capital: An interpretation from the perspective of management. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 4(11), 2226–8235.Google Scholar
  55. Roseman, I. J., Wiest, C., & Swartz, T. S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 206–221.Google Scholar
  56. Rothblum, E. D. (1990). Fear of failure: The psychodynamic, need achievement, fear of success, and procrastination models. In H. Leitenberg (Ed.), Handbook of social and evaluation anxiety (pp. 497–537). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  57. Salovey, P., & Rodin, J. (1984). Some antecedents and consequences of social-comparison jealousy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(4), 780–792.Google Scholar
  58. Schoeck, H. (1969). Envy: A theory of social behaviour. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
  59. Seo, M. G., Goldfarb, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2010). Affect and the framing effect within individuals over time: Risk taking in a dynamic investment simulation. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 411–431.Google Scholar
  60. Smith, R. H., & Kim, S. H. (2007). Comprehending envy. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 46–64.Google Scholar
  61. Stamps, L. W. (1973). The effects of intervention techniques on children’s fear of failure behavior. The Journal of genetic psychology, 123(1), 85–97.Google Scholar
  62. Sterling, C. M., & Labianca, G. (2015). Costly comparisons: Managing envy in the workplace. Organizational Dynamics, 44(4), 296–305.Google Scholar
  63. Tai, K., Narayanan, J., & Mcallister, D. J. (2012). Envy as pain: Rethinking the nature of envy and its implications for employees and organizations. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 107–129.Google Scholar
  64. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.Google Scholar
  65. van de Ven, N. (2016). Envy and its consequences: Why it is useful to distinguish between benign and malicious envy. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(6), 337–349.Google Scholar
  66. van de Ven, N., Hoogland, C. E., Smith, R. H., van Dijk, W. W., Breugelmans, S. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2015). When envy leads to schadenfreude. Cognition and Emotion, 29(6), 1007–1025.Google Scholar
  67. van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2009). Leveling up and down: The experiences of benign and malicious envy. Emotion, 9(3), 419–429.Google Scholar
  68. van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2011a). The envy premium in product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 984–998.Google Scholar
  69. van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2011b). Why envy outperforms admiration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 784–795.Google Scholar
  70. van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2012). Appraisal patterns of envy and related emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 36(2), 195–204.Google Scholar
  71. van Dijk, W. W. V., Ouwerkerk, J. W., Smith, R. H., & Cikara, M. (2015). The role of self-evaluation and envy in schadenfreude. European Review of Social Psychology, 26(1), 247–282.Google Scholar
  72. Wikman, J. M., Stelter, R., Melzer, M., Hauge, M. L., & Elbe, A. M. (2014). Effects of goal setting on fear of failure in young elite athletes. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12(3), 185–205.Google Scholar
  73. Zhang, D., Gu, R., Wu, T., Broster, L. S., Luo, Y., Jiang, Y., et al. (2013). An electrophysiological index of changes in risk decision-making strategies. Neuropsychologia, 51(8), 1397–1407.Google Scholar
  74. Zuber, C., Zibung, M., & Conzelmann, A. (2015). Motivational patterns as an instrument for predicting success in promising young football players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(2), 160–168.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyShaanxi Normal UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.Shaanxi Normal University BranchCollaborative Innovation Center of Assessment Toward Basic Education Quality at Beijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations