Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 43, Issue 5, pp 758–770 | Cite as

Connections in the classroom: Separating the effects of instructor and peer relatedness in the basic needs satisfaction scale

  • Heather N. FedescoEmail author
  • Emily M. Bonem
  • Cong Wang
  • Regina Henares
Original Paper

Abstract

When applying self-determination theory to educational settings, evidence suggests that the basic psychological need of relatedness is actually multi-dimensional, which could result in differential influences on intrinsic motivation. Thus, this study proposes a modification to the operationalization of relatedness. The relatedness items from the adapted Basic Satisfaction Needs at Work scale were altered so that items asked students to separately report the amount of connection they feel with their instructors and peers, as opposed to the original items that asked them to more broadly reflect on people in their course. College students (556 female, 321 male) completed a questionnaire assessing their basic psychological needs, including the two new relatedness subscales, motivation, and academic outcomes. Results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the original relatedness scale should, in fact, be treated as two-dimensional. In addition, of all the basic psychological needs, instructor relatedness was most predictive of student interest/enjoyment in the course and self-reported effort. Conversely, peer relatedness did not significantly predict any outcome variables. Study implications, limitations, and areas for future research are discussed.

Keywords

Relatedness Self-determination theory Instructor connections Peer connections 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation’s Grant to Strengthen Innovation in Engaged Teaching and Learning, which was awarded to Colorado College [Grant Number 31300614].

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3 (pp. 543–559). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, T. H., & Phillips, L. J. (2015). The influence of motivation and adaptation on students’ subjective well-being, meaning in life and academic performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 35, 201–216.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1087474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beachboard, M. R., Beachboard, J. C., Li, W., & Adkison, S. R. (2011). Cohorts and relatedness: Self-determination theory as an explanation of how learning communities affect educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 52, 853–874.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9221-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740–756.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237x(200011)84:6%3c740:aid-sce4%3e3.0.co;2-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Moon, I. S. (2012). Experimentally based, longitudinally designed, teacher-focused intervention to help physical education teachers be more autonomy supportive toward their students. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 34, 365–396.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.34.3.365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49, 182.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former Eastern Bloc country. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 930–942.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201278002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eisinga, R., Te Grotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? International Journal of Public Health, 58, 637–642.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Frisby, B. N., & Martin, M. M. (2010). Instructor–student and student–student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59, 146–164.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903564362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148–162.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40–53.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528809378702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guay, F., Denault, A.-S., & Renauld, S. (2017). School attachment and relatedness with parents, friends and teachers as predictors of students’ intrinsic and identified regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 416–428.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guay, F., Marsh, H. W., Senécal, C., & Dowson, M. (2008). Representations of relatedness with parents and friends and autonomous academic motivation during the late adolescence–early adulthood period: Reciprocal or unidirectional effects? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 621–637.  https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908x280971.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Guiffrida, D., Gouveia, A., Wall, A., & Seward, D. (2008). Development and validation of the need for relatedness at college questionnaire (NRC-Q). Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1, 251–261.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guiffrida, D. A., Lynch, M. F., Wall, A. F., & Abel, D. S. (2013). Do reasons for attending college affect academic outcomes? A test of a motivational model from a self-determination theory perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 54, 121–139.  https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2013.0019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hughes, J. N., & Chen, Q. (2011). Reciprocal effects of student–teacher and student–peer relatedness: Effects on academic self efficacy. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 278–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2010.03.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Ilardi, B. C., Leone, D., Kasser, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). Employee and supervisor ratings of motivation: Main effects and discrepancies associated with job satisfaction and adjustment in a factory setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1789–1805.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01066.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 644–661.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jenkins-Guarnieri, M. A., Vaughan, A. L., & Wright, S. L. (2015). Development of a self-determination measure for college students: Validity evidence for the Basic Needs Satisfaction at College Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 48, 266–284.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175615578737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnston, M. M., & Finney, S. J. (2010). Measuring basic needs satisfaction: Evaluating previous research and conducting new psychometric evaluations of the Basic Needs Satisfaction in General Scale. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 280–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kasser, T., Davey, J., & Ryan, R. M. (1992). Motivation, dependability, and employee supervisor discrepancies in psychiatric vocational rehabilitation settings. Rehabilitation Psychology, 37, 175–187.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim, J. (2011). Developing an instrument to measure social presence in distance higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 763–777.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01107.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Levesque-Bristol, C., Knapp, T. D., & Fisher, B. J. (2010). The effectiveness of service-learning: It’s not always what you think. Journal of Experiential Education, 33, 208–224.  https://doi.org/10.5193/jee33.3.208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mehrabian, A. (1967). Attitudes inferred from nonimmediacy of verbal communication. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 294–295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(67)80113-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. School Field, 7, 133–144.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Plant, R. W., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and the effects of self-consciousness, self-awareness, and ego-involvement: An investigation of internally-controlling styles. Journal of Personality, 53, 435–449.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1985.tb00375.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ray, J., & Kafka, S. (2014, May 6). Life in college matters for life after college. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/168848/life-college-matters-life-college.aspx
  35. Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 10 (pp. 574–590). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Richmond, V. P., Lane, D. R., & McCroskey, J. C. (2006). Teacher immediacy and the teacher–student relationship. In T. Mottet, V. Richmond, & J. McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 167–193). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  37. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  38. Ryan, R. M., Mims, V., & Koestner, R. (1983). Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 736–750.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.45.4.736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ryan, R. M., Stiller, J. D., & Lynch, J. H. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 226–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Satorra, A., & Saris, W. E. (1985). Power of the likelihood ratio test in covariance structure analysis. Psychometrika, 50, 83–90.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A test of self-determination theory in school physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 411–433.  https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904x22359.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Taylor, G., Jungert, T., Mageau, G. A., Schattke, K., Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S., et al. (2014). A self-determination theory approach to predicting school achievement over time: The unique role of intrinsic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 342–358.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Taylor, I. M., & Ntoumanis, N. (2007). Teacher motivational strategies and student self-determination in physical education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 747–760.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thogersen-Ntoumani, C., Ntoumanis, N., Cumming, J., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2011). When feeling attractive matters too much to women: A process underpinning the relation between psychological need satisfaction and unhealthy weight control behaviors. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 413–422.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9226-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Trenshaw, K. F., Revelo, R. A., Earl, K. A., & Herman, G. L. (2016). Using self-determination theory principles to promote engineering students’ intrinsic motivation to learn. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32, 1194–1207.Google Scholar
  46. Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246–260.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Purdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  3. 3.Colorado CollegeColorado SpringsUSA

Personalised recommendations