Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 43, Issue 5, pp 824–843 | Cite as

Because I want to share, not because I should: Prosocial implications of gratitude expression in repeated zero-sum resource allocation exchanges

  • Dejun Tony KongEmail author
  • Liuba Y. Belkin
Original Paper

Abstract

The current research examines how gratitude (vs. neutral) expression indirectly reinforces prosocial resource-allocation decisions in repeated zero-sum social exchanges. Drawing upon the emotion as social information (EASI) model, we found in four experiments that counterpart (recipient) gratitude (vs. neutral) expression regarding participants’ (allocators’) resource-allocation proposal in Exchange 1 evoked participants’ perception of their counterpart’s benevolence (when the proposal was accepted). Consistent with self-determination theory, participants’ perception of their counterpart’s benevolence led to their prosocial resource-allocation decision toward their counterpart in Exchange 2 due to their prosocial motivation, independently from and jointly with their obligatory motivation. Notably, in three experiments (“Study 1b”–“Study 3” sections), participants’ obligatory motivation attenuated the positive link between their prosocial motivation and prosocial resource-allocation decision in Exchange 2. Taken together, our findings highlight that expressing gratitude in repeated zero-sum social exchanges is a desirable strategy for shaping a counterpart’s benevolence perception and motivating the counterpart to make a prosocial resource-allocation decision.

Keywords

Gratitude expression Resource allocation Benevolence Prosocial motivation Obligatory motivation 

Notes

References

  1. Algoe, S. B. (2012). Find, remind, and bind: The functions of gratitude in everyday relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 455–469.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00439.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Algoe, S. B., Fredrickson, B. L., & Gable, S. L. (2013). The social functions of the emotion of gratitude via expression. Emotion, 13, 605–609.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bazerman, M. H., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Wade-Benzoni, K. (1998). Negotiating with yourself and losing: Making decisions with competing internal preferences. Academy of Management Review, 23, 225–241.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.533224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belkin, L. Y., & Kong, D. T. (2018). Implications of advice rejection in repeated exchanges: Advisor responses and advisee gratitude expression as a buffer. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 181–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belkin, L. Y., & Rothman, N. B. (2017). Do I trust you? Depends on what you feel: Interpersonal effects of emotions on initial trust at zero-acquaintance. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 10, 3–27.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg, M. B., Janoff-Bulman, R., & Cotter, J. (2001). Perceiving value in obligations and goals: Wanting to do what should be done. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 982–995.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201278006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Bottom, W. P., Holloway, J., Miller, G. J., Mislin, A., & Whitford, A. (2006). Building a pathway to cooperation: Negotiation and social exchange between principal and agent. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 29–58.  https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.1.29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bregman, P. (November, 2012). Do you really need to say thank you? Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2012/11/do-you-really-need-to-say-than.
  10. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Campagna, R. L., Mislin, A. A., Kong, D. T., & Bottom, W. P. (2016). Strategic consequences of emotional misrepresentation in negotiation: The blowback effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 605–624.  https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000072.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2005). Expressed preferences and behavior in experimental games. Games and Economic Behavior, 53, 151–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2004.09.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, C. D., Kong, D. T., & Crossley, C. D. (2018). Leader humor as an interpersonal resource: Integrating three theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 61, 769–796.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874–900.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cuddy, A. J., Kohut, M., & Neffinger, J. (2013). Connect, then lead. Harvard Business Review, 91, 54–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49, 182–185.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 42–51.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Epley, N., Caruso, E. M., & Bazerman, M. H. (2006). When perspective taking increases taking: Reactive egoism in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 872–889.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.872.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fitzgerald, P. (1998). Gratitude and justice. Ethics, 109, 119–153.  https://doi.org/10.1086/233876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Forgas, J. P., & George, J. M. (2001). Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations: An information processing perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 3–34.  https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frazier, M. L., Johnson, P. D., & Fainshmidt, S. (2013). Development and validation of a propensity to trust scale. Journal of Trust Research, 3, 76–97.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2013.820026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Gratitude, like other positive emotions, broadens and builds. In R. A. Emmons & M. E. McCullough (Eds.), The psychology of gratitude (pp. 145–166). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00001-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gino, F., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2008). Blinded by anger or feeling the love: How emotions influence advice taking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1165–1173.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grandey, A. A., Fisk, G. M., Mattila, A. S., Jansen, K. J., & Sideman, L. A. (2005). Is “service with a smile” enough? Authenticity of positive displays during service encounters. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 38–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 48–58.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Grant, A. M., & Gino, F. (2010). A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 946–955.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017935.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Grant, A. M., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 900–912.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013770.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Grant, A. M., Nurmohamed, S., Ashford, S. J., & Dekas, K. (2011). The performance implications of ambivalent initiative: The interplay of autonomous and controlled motivations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 241–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grant, A. M., & Sumanth, J. J. (2009). Mission possible? The performance of prosocially motivated employees depends on manager trustworthiness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 927–944.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014391.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Greenberg, M. S. (1980). A theory of indebtedness. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg & R. H. Wills (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  36. Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3, 367–388.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  38. Herhausen, D., De Luca, L. M., & Weibel, M. (2017). The interplay between employee and firm customer orientation: Substitution effect and the contingency role of performance-related rewards. British Journal of Management.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6, 307–324.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.6.4.307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Janoff-Bulman, R., & Leggatt, H. K. (2002). Culture and social obligation: When “should” are perceived as “wants. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 260–270.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2001.2345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business, 59, S4–S285.Google Scholar
  42. Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 505–521.  https://doi.org/10.1080/026999399379168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (1998). Emotion, social function, and psychopathology. Review of General Psychology, 2, 320–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kong, D. T. (2018). Trust toward a group of strangers as a function of stereotype-based social identification. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 265–270.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43, 1854–1884.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315575554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lambert, N. M., Clark, M. S., Durtschi, J., Fincham, F. D., & Graham, S. M. (2010). Benefits of expressing gratitude: Expressing gratitude to a partner changes one’s view of the relationship. Psychological Science, 21, 574–580.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610364003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lawler, E. J. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 321–352.  https://doi.org/10.1086/324071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lawler, E. J., & Thye, S. R. (1999). Bringing emotions into social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 217–244.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 153–174.  https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.2.153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Liebrand, W. B. G., Jansen, R. W. T. L., Rijken, V. M., & Suhre, C. J. M. (1986). Might over morality: Social values and the perception of other plays in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 203–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90024-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267–286.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Loyd, D. L., Wang, C. S., Phillips, K. W., & Lount, R. B. Jr. (2013). Social category diversity promotes premeeting elaboration: The role of relationship focus. Organization Science, 24, 757–772.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Korten, A. E., Jacomb, P. A., & Rodgers, B. (1999). A short form of the positive and negative affect schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual differences, 27, 405–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123–136.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 112–127.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Meeker, B. F. (1971). Decisions and exchange. American Sociological Review, 36, 485–495.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2093088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Milkman, K. L., Rogers, T., & Bazerman, M. H. (2008). Harnessing our inner angels and demons: What we have learned about want/should conflicts and how that knowledge can help us reduce short-sighted decision making. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 324–338.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00083.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Morris, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2000). How emotions work: The social functions of emotional expression in negotiations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 1–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22002-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mossholder, K. W., Settoon, R. P., & Henagan, S. C. (2005). A relational perspective on turnover: Examining structural, attitudinal, and behavioral predictors. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 607–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mullen, E., & Monin, B. (2016). Consistency versus licensing effects of past moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 363–385.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  62. Pillutla, M. M., & Murnighan, J. K. (1996). Unfairness, anger, and spite: Emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 208–224.  https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pirlott, A. G., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2016). Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 29–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Rind, B., & Bordia, P. (1995). Effect of server’s “thank you” and personalization on restaurant tipping. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 745–751.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01772.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Simons, T., Friedman, R., Liu, L. A., & McLean Parks, J. (2007). Racial differences in sensitivity to behavioral integrity: Attitudinal consequences, in-group effects, and “trickle down” among Black and non-Black employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 650–665.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.650.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than meditational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Summerville, A., & Chartier, C. R. (2013). Pseudo-dyadic “interaction” on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 116–124.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0250-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Thaler, R. H. (1988). Anomalies: The ultimatum game. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2, 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Van Fleet, D. D., & Atwater, L. (1997). Gender neutral names: Don’t be so sure! Sex Roles, 37, 111–123.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025696905342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Van Kleef, G. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 184–188.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2006). Supplication and appeasement in conflict and negotiation: The interpersonal effects of disappointment, worry, guilt, and regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 124–142.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2010). An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: The emotions as social information model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 45–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(10)42002-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Wang, Z., Singh, S. N., Li, Y. J., Mishra, S., Ambrose, M., & Biernat, M. (2017). Effects of employees’ positive affective displays on customer loyalty intentions: An emotions-as-social-information perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 109–129.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Watkins, P. C., Scheer, J., Ovnicek, M., & Kolts, R. (2006). The debt of gratitude: Dissociating gratitude and indebtedness. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 217–241.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930500172291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 222–244.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016984.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Williams, L. A., & Bartlett, M. Y. (2015). Warm thanks: Gratitude expression facilitates social affiliation in new relationships via perceived warmth. Emotion, 15, 1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management and Leadership, Bauer College of BusinessUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Management, College of Business and EconomicsLehigh UniversityBethlehemUSA

Personalised recommendations