Advertisement

Increasing curiosity through autonomy of choice

  • Nicola S. SchutteEmail author
  • John M. Malouff
Original Paper

Abstract

This study examined the effect of satisfaction of the basic psychological need for autonomy on curiosity. One hundred and fifty-four participants first completed measures of autonomy-need satisfaction and curiosity. Participants were then randomly assigned to either a condition that supported autonomy of choice or a condition not supporting autonomy of choice. The autonomy-choice intervention provided participants with choice of topic for a video they could watch, while those in the no-autonomy of choice condition did not have choice. All participants then rated their curiosity regarding the topic of the video. Results showed that participants whose need for autonomy was more satisfied had higher levels of curiosity. Participants randomly assigned to the autonomy of choice condition providing choice of topic showed greater curiosity regarding the topic than participants who did not have a choice of topic. Autonomy of choice was most beneficial in stimulating a high level of curiosity about the topic for participants who had low general autonomy need satisfaction. The results of the study support the importance of self-determination in fostering the emotion of curiosity.

Keywords

Autonomy Autonomy of choice Autonomy support Curiosity Self-Determination Theory 

Notes

Funding

This research was not supported by external funding.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., … Ryan, R. M. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 216–236.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1.Google Scholar
  2. Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715–730.Google Scholar
  3. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The” what” and” why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9450-110.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.Google Scholar
  4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49, 14–23.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.24.Google Scholar
  5. Dwee, C. Y., & Anthony, E. M. (2017). Learner autonomy in university English classrooms: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6, 19–25.  https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.Google Scholar
  6. Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2, 300–319.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300.Google Scholar
  7. Fredrickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. (2018). Reflections on positive emotions and upward spirals. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 194–199.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617692106.Google Scholar
  8. Gallagher, M. W., & Lopez, S. J. (2007). Curiosity and well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 236–248.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701552345.Google Scholar
  9. Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890–898.Google Scholar
  10. Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology, 49, 233–240.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012758.Google Scholar
  11. Hardré, P., & Reeve, J. (2009). Benefits of training corporate managers to adopt a more autonomy supportive style toward employees: An intervention study. International Journal of Training and Development, 13, 165–184.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2009.00325.x.Google Scholar
  12. Harrison, S. H., & Dossinger, K. (2017). Pliable guidance: A multilevel model of curiosity, feedback seeking, and feedback giving in creative work. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 2051–2072.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0247.Google Scholar
  13. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349–366.Google Scholar
  14. Johnston, M. M., & Finney, S. J. (2010). Measuring basic needs satisfaction: Evaluating previous research and conducting new psychometric evaluations of the Basic Needs Satisfaction in General Scale. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 280–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.04.003.Google Scholar
  15. Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., & Fincham, F. D. (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82, 291–305.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8203_05.Google Scholar
  16. Kashdan, T. B., & Steger, M. F. (2007). Curiosity and pathways to well-being and meaning in life: Traits, states, and everyday behaviors. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 159–173.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-007-9068-7.Google Scholar
  17. Kashdan, T. B., Stiksma, M. C., Disabato, D. D., McKnight, P. E., Bekier, J., Kaji, J., & Lazarus, R. (2018). The five-dimensional curiosity scale: Capturing the bandwidth of curiosity and identifying four unique subgroups of curious people. Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 130–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.011.Google Scholar
  18. Katz, I., & Assor, A. (2007). When choice motivates and when it does not. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 429–442.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9027-y.Google Scholar
  19. Lauriola, M., Litman, J. A., Mussel, P., De Santis, R., Crowson, H. M., & Hoffman, R. R. (2015). Epistemic curiosity and self-regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 202–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.017.Google Scholar
  20. Litman, J. A. (2005). Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking new information. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 793–814.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930541000101.Google Scholar
  21. Litman, J. A. (2008). Interest and deprivation dimensions of epistemic curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1585–1595.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.014.Google Scholar
  22. Litman, J. A., Crowson, H. M., & Kolinski, K. (2010). Validity of the interest- and deprivation-type epistemic curiosity distinction in non-students. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 531–536.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.021.Google Scholar
  23. Litman, J. A., & Pezzo, M. V. (2007). Dimensionality of interpersonal curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1448–1459.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.021.Google Scholar
  24. Litman, J. A., Robinson, O. C., & Demetre, J. (2017). Intrapersonal curiosity: Inquisitiveness about the inner self. Self and Identity, 16, 231–250.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2016.1255250.Google Scholar
  25. Mussel, P., Spengler, M., Litman, J. A., & Schuler, H. (2012). Development and validation of the German work-related curiosity scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28, 109–117.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000098.Google Scholar
  26. Must See, T. E. D., & Talks (2018). Retrieved January 5, 2018, from https://www.ted.com/playlists/77/11_must_see_ted_talks.
  27. Ng, J. Y., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Duda, J. L., & Williams, G. C. (2012). Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 325–340.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612447309.Google Scholar
  28. Noordewier, M. K., & van Dijk, E. (2017). Curiosity and time: From not knowing to almost knowing. Cognition and Emotion, 31, 411–421.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1122577.Google Scholar
  29. Reeve, J., Nix, G., & Hamm, D. (2003). Testing models of the experience of self-determination in intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 375–392.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.375.Google Scholar
  30. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.  https://doi.org/10.10371/10003-066X.55.1.68.Google Scholar
  31. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Silvia, P. (2008). Appraisal components and emotion traits: Examining the appraisal basis of trait curiosity. Cognition & Emotion, 22, 94–113.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701298481.Google Scholar
  33. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th edn.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  34. Von Stumm, S., Hell, B., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2011). The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 574–588.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611421204.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations