Advertisement

When smiling back helps and scowling back hurts: individual differences in emotional mimicry are associated with self-reported interaction quality during conflict interactions

  • Heidi MauersbergerEmail author
  • Ursula Hess
Original Paper

Abstract

Conflicts or disagreements during which negative, antagonistic emotions are expressed are perceived as uncomfortable. By contrast, disagreements accompanied by positive, affiliative emotions are less detrimental to interaction quality. We assessed whether individual differences in emotional mimicry have differential effects on interaction quality during disagreements with negative emotions compared to disagreements with positive emotions. For this, participants talked with someone who disagreed with them in a controlled laboratory setting, while emotional mimicry was assessed via facial EMG. The interaction partner showed either an antagonistic or an affiliative demeanor during the interaction. Following the interaction, participants reported on perceived interaction quality. In line with the Emotional Mimicry in Context view (Hess and Fischer in Pers Social Psychol Rev 17:142–157, 2013), emotional mimicry decreased interaction quality when the person who disagreed showed an antagonistic demeanor but increased interaction quality when the person who disagreed showed an affiliative demeanor. Furthermore, implicit affiliation motivation predicted emotional mimicry regardless the context.

Keywords

Conflicts Disagreements Antagonistic emotions Affiliative emotions Emotional mimicry Implicit affiliation motivation 

Notes

Funding

Data collection of this study was supported by a grant from the structured graduate program “Self-Regulation Dynamics Across Adulthood and Old Age: Potentials and Limits” (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) to Heidi Mauersberger.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the study that involved human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

11031_2018_9743_MOESM1_ESM.docx (124 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 125 KB)

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Biernat, M. (1989). Motives and values to achieve: Different constructs with different effects. Journal of Personality, 57, 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourgeois, P., & Hess, U. (2008). The impact of social context on mimicry. Biological Psychology, 77, 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley, B. H., Anderson, H. J., Baur, J. E., & Klotz, A. C. (2015). When conflict helps: Integrating evidence for beneficial conflict in groups and teams under three perspectives. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19, 243–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brunstein, J. C., & Hoyer, S. (2002). Implizites und explizites Leistungsstreben: Befunde zur Unabhängigkeit zweier Motivationssysteme [Implicit versus explicit achievement strivings: Empirical evidence of the independence of two motivational systems]. Zeitschrift Fur Pädagogische Psychologie, 16, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Byrne, D., McDonald, R. D., & Mikawa, J. (1963). Approach and avoidance affiliation motives. Journal of Personality, 31, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chartrand, T. L., & Lakin, J. L. (2013). The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Wit, F. R. C., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 360–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1982). False, felt, and miserable smiles. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6, 238–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elfenbein, H. A. (2014). The many faces of emotional contagion: An affective process theory for affective linkage. Organizational Psychology Review, 4, 326–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischer, A. H., & Hess, U. (2016). Introduction: Why and how we mimic emotions. In U. Hess & A. Fischer (Eds.), Emotional mimicry in social context (pp. 1–6). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fischer, A. H., & Hess, U. (2017). Mimicking emotions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 17, 151–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. French, E. G., & Chadwick, I. (1956). Some characteristics in affiliation motivation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 296–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fridlund, A. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Guidelines for human electromyographic research. Psychophysiology, 23, 567–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gable, S. L. (2006). Approach and avoidance social motives and goals. Journal of Personality, 74, 175–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hess, U. (2009). Facial EMG. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. S. Beer (Eds.), Methods in social neuroscience (pp. 70–91). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hess, U., & Blairy, S. (2001). Facial mimicry and emotional contagion to dynamic emotional facial expressions and their influence on decoding accuracy. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hess, U., & Bourgeois, P. (2010). You smile-I smile: Emotion expression in social interaction. Biological Psychology, 84, 514–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hess, U., & Fischer, A. (2013). Emotional mimicry as social regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 142–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hess, U., & Fischer, A. (2014). Emotional mimicry: Why and when we mimic emotions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hess, U., & Fischer, A. H. (2016). Conclusion: Toward a better understanding of emotional mimicry. In U. Hess & A. Fischer (Eds.), Emotional mimicry in social context (pp. 222–229). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heyns, R. W., Veroff, J., & Atkinson, J. W. (1958). A scoring manual for the affiliation motive. In J. W. Atkinson (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action, and society (pp. 205–218). Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  23. Hofer, J., & Busch, H. (2011). When the needs for affiliation and intimacy are frustrated: Envy and indirect aggression among German and Cameroonian adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 187–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Knutson, B. (1996). Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kurzius, E., & Borkenau, P. (2015). Antecedents and consequences of mimicry: A naturalistic interaction approach. European Journal of Personality, 29, 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lakens, D. (2016). TOST equivalence testing R package (TOSTER) and spreadsheet. Retrieved from http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2016/12/tost-equivalence-testing-r-package.html.
  29. Lakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). The Chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lanzetta, J. T., & Englis, B. G. (1989). Expectations of cooperation and competition and their effects on observers’ vicarious emotional responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Grohmann, A., & Kauffeld, S. (2011). Task and relationship conflict at work: Construct validation of a German version of Jehn’s Intragroup Conflict Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Likowski, K. U., Mühlberger, A., Seibt, B., Pauli, P., & Weyers, P. (2011). Processes underlying congruent and incongruent facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Emotion, 11, 457–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mauersberger, H., Blaison, C., Kafetsios, K., Kessler, C. L., & Hess, U. (2015). Individual differences in emotional mimicry: Underlying traits and social consequences. European Journal of Personality, 29, 512–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mauersberger, H., Hess, U., & Hoppe, A. (2018). Measuring task conflicts as they occur: A real-time assessment of task conflicts and their immediate emotional and cognitive consequences. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  35. McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  36. McClelland, D. C., & Kirshnit, C. (1988). The effect of motivational arousal through films on salivary immunoglobulin A. Psychology and Health, 2, 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schönbrodt, F. D., & Gerstenberg, F. X. R. (2012). An IRT analysis of motive questionnaires: The Unified Motive Scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 725–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schultheiss, O. C., & Brunstein, J. C. (2010). Implicit motives. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schultheiss, O. C., & Hale, J. A. (2007). Implicit motives modulate attentional orienting to facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schultheiss, O. C., & Pang, J. S. (2007). Measuring implicit motives. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley & R. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 322–344). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  41. Sokolowski, K., & Heckhausen, H. (2008). Social bonding: Affiliation motivation and intimacy motivation. In J. Heckhausen & H. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation and action (pp. 184–201). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sonnby-Borgström, M. (2016). Emotional mimicry: Underlying mechanisms and individual differences. In U. Hess & A. Fischer (Eds.), Emotional mimicry in social context (pp. 125–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spector, P. E., & Bruk-Lee, V. (2008). Conflict, health, and well-being. In C. K. W. De Dreu & M. J. Gelfand (Eds.), The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations (pp. 267–288). San Francisco: Jossey-Basss.Google Scholar
  44. Stanton, S. J., Hall, J. L., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2010). Properties of motive-specific incentives. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 245–278). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stel, M., Van Baaren, R. B., & Vonk, R. (2008). Effects of mimicking: Acting prosocially by being emotionally moved. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 965–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stel, M., & Vonk, R. (2010). Mimicry in social interaction: Benefits for mimickers, mimickees, and their interaction. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thibault, P., Levesque, M., Gosselin, P., & Hess, U. (2012). The Duchenne marker is not a universal signal of smile authenticity—But it can be learned! Special Issue of Social Psychology on Culture as Process, 43, 215–221.Google Scholar
  48. van der Schalk, J., Fischer, A., Doosje, B., Wigboldus, D., Hawk, S., Rotteveel, M., et al. (2011). Convergent and divergent responses to emotional displays of ingroup and outgroup. Emotion, 11, 286–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weinberger, J., Cotler, T., & Fishman, D. (2010). The duality of affiliative motivation. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 71–88). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weisbuch, M., & Ambady, N. (2008). Affective divergence: Automatic responses to others’ emotions Depend on Group Membership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1063–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weyers, P., Mühlberger, A., Kund, A., Hess, U., & Pauli, P. (2009). Modulation of facial reactions to avatar emotional faces by nonconscious competition priming. Psychophysiology, 46, 328–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Winter, D. G. (1994). Manual for scoring motive imagery in running text. Ann Arbor: Department of Psychology, University of Michigan (Unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  53. Wirth, M. M., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2006). Effects of affiliation arousal (hope of closeness) and affiliation stress (fear of rejection) on progesterone and cortisol. Hormones and Behavior, 50, 786–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yabar, Y., & Hess, U. (2007). Display of empathy and perception of out-group members. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 36, 42–49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations