Advertisement

When and why performance goals predict exploitation behaviors: An achievement goal complex analysis of the selection function of assessment

  • Nicolas SommetEmail author
  • David Nguyen
  • Kevin Fahrni
  • Martin Jobin
  • Ha-Phong Nguyen
  • Hamza Sehaqui
  • Fabrizio Butera
Original Paper
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

We adopted an achievement goal complex framework (studying achievement goals and reasons connected to goals) to determine when and why performance goals predict exploitation of others’ knowledge. We hypothesized that: (i) when selective assessment is used (exams aiming to select a limited number of individuals), the link between performance goals and exploitation orientation is stronger; (ii) the reason why is that selective assessment fosters performance goals regulated by controlled reasons. Study 1 (N = 166) supported these hypotheses in a “real world” environment, comparing students enrolled in programs using non-selective versus selective assessment (but having a majority of common courses). Then, an experimental causal-chain-like design was used. In Study 2 (N = 187), presenting an intelligence test as selective (vs. [self-]evaluative) predicted controlled reasons connected to performance goals. In Study 3 (N = 192), inducing performance goals using controlling (vs. autonomy-supportive) language predicted exploitation orientation, indirectly impairing information-sharing behaviors. The results contribute to the understanding of both the structural antecedents and interpersonal consequences of achievement goal complexes.

Keywords

Achievement goals Self-determination theory Achievement goal complex Exploitation orientation Selective assessment 

Supplementary material

11031_2018_9742_MOESM1_ESM.docx (6.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 6230 KB)

References

  1. Autin, F., Batruch, A., & Butera, F. (2015). Social justice in education: How the function of selection in educational institutions predicts support for (non) egalitarian assessment practices. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benita, M., Shane, N., Elgali, O., & Roth, G. (2017). The important role of the context in which achievement goals are adopted: An experimental test. Motivation and Emotion, 41, 180–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkovits, I., Hancock, G. R., & Nevitt, J. (2000). Bootstrap resampling approaches for repeated measure designs: Relative robustness to sphericity and normality violations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 877–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1970). La Reproduction: Éléments d’une théorie du système d’enseignement [Reproduction: Elements for a Theory of the Educational System]. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, C. H., Law, V., & Chen, W. Y. (2017). The effects of peer competition-based science learning game on secondary students’ performance, achievement goals, and perceived ability. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(2), 235–244Google Scholar
  6. Cheung, P. C., Ma, H. K., & Shek, D. T. (1998). Conceptions of success: Their correlates with prosocial orientation and behaviour in Chinese adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 21, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ciani, K. D., Middleton, M. J., Summers, J. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (2010). Buffering against performance classroom goal structures: The importance of autonomy support and classroom community. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 88–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conroy, D. E., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2009). Achievement motivation. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 382–399). NewYork: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Coombs, R. (1998). Surviving medical school. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Crouzevialle, M., & Butera, F. (2013). Performance-approach goals deplete working memory and impair cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 666–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Darnon, B., & Butera, F. (2005). Buts d’accomplissement, stratégies d’étude, et motivation intrinsèque: Présentation d’un domaine de recherche et validation française de l’échelle d’Elliot et McGregor (2001) [Achievement goals, study strategies, and intrinsic motivation: Presenting a domain of research and the French validation of Elliot & McGregor’s scale]. L’Année Psychologique, 105, 105–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darnon, C., Dompnier, B., Delmas, F., Pulfrey, C., & Butera, F. (2009). Achievement goal promotion at university: Social desirability and social utility of mastery and performance goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darnon, C., Dompnier, B., & Poortvliet, P. M. (2012). Achievement goals in educational contexts: A social psychology perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 760–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daumiller, M., Dickhäuser, O., & Dresel, M. (2018). University instructors’ achievement goals for teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Paola, M. (2011). Easy grading practices and supply–demand factors: Evidence from Italy. Empirical Economics, 41, 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deci, E. L., Betley, G., Kahle, J., Abrams, L., & Porac, J. (1981). When trying to win: Competition and intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and” why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). Optimizing students’ motivation in the era of testing and pressure: A self-determination theory perspective. In W. C. Liu, J. C. K. Wang & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Building autonomous learners: Perspectives from research and practice using self-determination theory (pp. 9–29). Singapore: Springer Singapore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Delrue, J., Mouratidis, A., Haerens, L., De Muynck, G. J., Aelterman, N., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2016). Intrapersonal achievement goals and underlying reasons among long distance runners: Their relation with race experience, self-talk, and running time. Psychologica Belgica, 56, 288–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elliot, A. J., Aldhobaiban, N., Kobeisy, A., Murayama, K., Gocłowska, M. A., Lichtenfeld, S., & Khayat, A. (2016). Linking social interdependence preferences to achievement goal adoption. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 291–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2*2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2001). Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Freud, R. J., & Littell, R. C. (2000). SAS system for regression. Cary: Sas Institute.Google Scholar
  27. Fryer, J. W., & Elliot, A. J. (2008). Self-regulation of achievement goal pursuit. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 53–76). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Gaudreau, P. (2012). Goal self-concordance moderates the relationship between achievement goals and indicators of academic adjustment. Learning and Individual, 22(6), 827–832Google Scholar
  29. Gaudreau, P., & Braaten, A. (2016). Achievement goals and their underlying goal motivation: Does it matter why sport participants pursue their goals? Psychologica Belgica, 56, 244–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gillet, N., Lafrenière, M. A. K., Huyghebaert, T., & Fouquereau, E. (2015). Autonomous and controlled reasons underlying achievement goals: Implications for the 3 × 2 achievement goal model in educational and work settings. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 858–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hodis, F. A., Tait, C., Hodis, G. M., Hodis, M. A., & Scornavacca, E. (2016). Analyzing student motivation at the confluence of achievement goals and their underlying reasons: An investigation of goal complexes. Social Psychology of Education, 19, 643–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1980). Promoting constructive student-student relationships through cooperative learning. Minneapolis: Minnesota University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 249 216). Retrived from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED249216.pdf.
  34. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in University Teaching, 25, 1–26.Google Scholar
  35. Judd, C. M., McClelland, G. H., & Ryan, C. S. (2015). Data analysis: A model comparison approach (2nd edn.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Jury, M., Darnon, C., Dompnier, B., & Butera, F. (2017). The social utility of performance-approach goals in a selective educational environment. Social Psychology of Education, 20, 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaufman, N. (1994). A survey of law school grading practices. Journal of Legal Education, 44, 415–423.Google Scholar
  38. Kilduff, G. J., Galinsky, A. D., Gallo, E., & Reade, J. J. (2016). Whatever it takes to win: Rivalry increases unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1508–1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Liem, G. A. D., & Elliot, A. J. (2018). Sociocultural influences on achievement goal adoption and regulation: A goal complex perspective. In G. A. D. Liem & D. M. McInerney (Eds.), Big theories revisited 2 (pp. 41–67). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Liem, G. A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mason, C. H., & Perreault, W. D. Jr. (1991). Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 268–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Michou, A., Matos, L., Gargurevich, R., Gumus, B., & Herrera, D. (2016). Building on the enriched hierarchical model of achievement motivation: Autonomous and controlling reasons underlying mastery goals. Psychologica Belgica, 56, 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2012). The competition-performance relation: A meta-analytic review and test of the opposing processes model of competition and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1035–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nelson, R. M., & DeBacker, T. K. (2008). Achievement motivation in adolescents: The role of peer climate and best friends. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76, 170–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ntoumanis, N., Healy, L. C., Sedikides, C., Duda, J., Stewart, B., Smith, A., & Bond, J. (2014). When the going gets tough: The “why” of goal striving matters. Journal of Personality, 82, 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. OECD. (2013). Education at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  47. Özdemir Oz, A., Lane, J. F., & Michou, A. (2016). Autonomous and controlling reasons underlying achievement goals during task engagement: Their relation to intrinsic motivation and cheating. Educational Psychology, 36, 1160–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pekrun, R., Cusack, A., Murayama, K., Elliot, A. J., & Thomas, K. (2014). The power of anticipated feedback: Effects on students’ achievement goals and achievement emotions. Learning and Instruction, 29, 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Poortvliet, P. M. (2012). Harming others’ task-related efforts: The distinct competitive effects of ranking information on performance and mastery goal individuals. Social Psychology, 44, 373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Poortvliet, P. M., & Darnon, C. (2014). Understanding positive attitudes toward helping peers: The role of mastery goals and academic self-efficacy. Self and Identity, 13, 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Poortvliet, P. M., Janssen, O., Van Yperen, N. W., & Van de Vliert, E. (2007). Achievement goals and interpersonal behavior: How mastery and performance goals shape information exchange. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1435–1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Poortvliet, P. M., Janssen, O., Van Yperen, N. W., & Van de Vliert, E. (2009a). Low ranks make the difference: How achievement goals and ranking information affect cooperation intentions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1144–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Poortvliet, P. M., Janssen, O., Van Yperen, N. W., & Van de Vliert, E. V. D. (2009b). The joint impact of achievement goals and performance feedback on information giving. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reeve, J., & Assor, A. (2011). Do social institutions necessarily suppress individuals’ need for autonomy? The possibility of schools as autonomy promoting contexts across the globe. In R. Chirkov, R. M. Ryan & K. Sheldon (Eds.), Human autonomy in cross-cultural context: Global perspectives on the psychology of freedom and people’s well-being. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  55. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). If you’re looking at the cell means, you’re not looking at only the interaction (unless all main effects are zero). Psychological Bulletin, 110, 574–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). Should I ask for help? The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents’ help seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ryan, R. M., & Brown, K. W. (2005). Legislating competence: The motivational impact of high stakes testing as an educational reform. In C. Dweck & A. E. Elliot (Eds.), Handbook of competence (pp. New York: Guilford Press. 354 – 374).Google Scholar
  59. Senko, C. (2016). Achievement goal theory: A story of early promises, eventual discords, and future possibilities. In K. Wentzel & D. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (Vol. 2, pp. 75–95). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Senko, C., & Dawson, B. (2017). Performance-approach goal effects depend on how they are defined: Meta-analytic evidence from multiple educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 574–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46, 26–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Senko, C., & Tropiano, K. L. (2016). Comparing three models of achievement goals: Goal orientations, goal standards, and goal complexes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 1178–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Not all personal goals are personal: Comparing autonomous and controlled reasons for goals as predictors of effort and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 546–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shieh, G. (2010). On the misconception of multicollinearity in detection of moderating effects: Multicollinearity is not always detrimental. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 483–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shin, J., Lee, Y. K., & Seo, E. (2017). The effects of feedback on students’ achievement goals: Interaction between reference of comparison and regulatory focus. Learning and Instruction, 49, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Skaalvik, E. M., & Federici, R. A. (2016). Relations between classroom goal structures and students’ goal orientations in mathematics classes: When is a mastery goal structure adaptive? Social Psychology of Education, 19, 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sommet, N., Darnon, C., & Butera, F. (2015). To confirm or to conform? Performance goals as a regulator of conflict with more-competent others. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 580–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sommet, N., Darnon, C., Mugny, G., Quiamzade, A., Pulfrey, C., Dompnier, B., & Butera, F. (2014). Performance goals in conflictual social interactions: Towards the distinction between two modes of relational conflict regulation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 134–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sommet, N., & Elliot, A. J. (2017). Achievement goals, reasons for goal pursuit, and achievement goal complexes as predictors of beneficial outcomes: Is the influence of goals reducible to reasons? Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(8), 1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sommet, N., Pillaud, V., Meuleman, B., & Butera, F. (2017). The socialization of performance goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sommet, N., Pulfrey, C., & Butera, F. (2013). Did my MD really go to university to learn? Detrimental effects of numerus clausus on self-efficacy, mastery goals and learning. PloS ONE, 8, e84178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sommet, N., Quiamzade, A., Jury, M. M., & Mugny, G. (2015). The student-institution fit at university: Interactive effects of academic competition and social class on achievement goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Spray, C. M., Wang, J. C. K., Biddle, S. J., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. (2006). Understanding motivation in sport: An experimental test of achievement goal and self determination theories. European Journal of Sport Science, 6, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Toma, C., Gilles, I., & Butera, F. (2013). Strategic use of preference confirmation in group decision making: The role of competition and dissent. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 44–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Urdan, T., & Mestas, M. (2006). The goals behind performance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 354–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Elliot, A. J., Soenens, B., & Mouratidis, A. (2014b). Moving the achievement goal approach one step forward: Toward a systematic examination of the autonomous and controlled reasons underlying achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 49, 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vansteenkiste, M., Mouratidis, A., & Lens, W. (2010a). Detaching reasons from aims: Fair play and well-being in soccer as a function of pursuing performance-approach goals for autonomous or controlling reasons. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 32, 217–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vansteenkiste, M., Mouratidis, A., Van Riet, T., & Lens, W. (2014a). Examining correlates of game-to-game variation in volleyball players’ achievement goal pursuit and underlying autonomous and controlling reasons. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 36, 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vansteenkiste, M., Smeets, S., Soenens, B., Lens, W., Matos, L., & Deci, E. L. (2010b). Autonomous and controlled regulation of performance-approach goals: Their relations to perfectionism and educational outcomes. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 333–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolas Sommet
    • 1
    Email author
  • David Nguyen
    • 2
    • 4
  • Kevin Fahrni
    • 2
  • Martin Jobin
    • 2
  • Ha-Phong Nguyen
    • 2
  • Hamza Sehaqui
    • 2
  • Fabrizio Butera
    • 3
  1. 1.Life Course and Inequality Research Centre (LINES)University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  3. 3.Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale (UNILaPS)University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  4. 4.Laboratoire d’Optique Biomédicale (LOB)Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations