Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 339–353 | Cite as

Everyday social interactions and intra-individual variability in affect: A systematic review and meta-analysis of ecological momentary assessment studies

  • Huiying Liu
  • Qian Wen Xie
  • Vivian W. Q. LouEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Intra-individual variability in affect has been associated with aspects of individuals’ lives, such as everyday social interactions. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) has been tailored to assess the dynamics of everyday events and feelings and in recent decades there has been a burgeoning of EMA research on the intra-individual links between social interactions and momentary affect in daily life. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to identify within-person relationships between social interactions with positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA). Both quantitative and qualitative features of social interaction (i.e., uniqueness of the partner, interpersonal perceptions of an interaction) predict within-person variance in PA and NA. The results of meta-analysis indicated small-sized associations between quantitative features of social interactions with PA and NA, and moderate-sized associations between qualitative features of social interactions with PA and NA, which were only somewhat moderated by methodological factors. We conclude that EMA is a promising method of investigating intra-individual variability in affect unfolding in everyday social environments and offer suggestions for substantiating the within-person perspective to both researchers and clinicians.

Keywords

Everyday life Social interaction Momentary affect Intra-individual variability Psychological traits 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. TSANG K.M. Sandra for her feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially supported by the Seed Fund for Translational and Applied Research Project at the University of Hong Kong (Ref. 201611160014).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

11031_2018_9735_MOESM1_ESM.docx (47 kb)
Online Appendix A (DOCX 46 KB)
11031_2018_9735_MOESM2_ESM.docx (55 kb)
Online Appendix B (DOCX 54 KB)

References

  1. aan het Rot, M., Hogenelst, K., & Schoevers, R. A. (2012). Mood disorders in everyday life: A systematic review of experience sampling and ecological momentary assessment studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(6), 510–523.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alshamsi, A., Pianesi, F., Lepri, B., Pentland, A., & Rahwan, I. (2016). Network diversity and affect dynamics: The role of personality traits. PLoS ONE.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152358.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bajaj, A., John-Henderson, N. A., Cundiff, J. M., Marsland, A. L., Manuck, S. B., & Kamarck, T. W. (2016). Daily social interactions, close relationships, and systemic inflammation in two samples: Healthy middle-aged and older adults. Brain Behavior and Immunity, 58, 152–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2016.06.004.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, L. A., Cesa, I. L., Gatz, M., & Mellins, C. (1992). Genetic and environmental influences on positive and negative affect: Support for a two-factor theory. Psychology and Aging, 7(1), 158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Beal, D. J. (2015). ESM 2.0: State of the art and future potential of experience sampling methods in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 383–407.Google Scholar
  6. Bernstein, M. J., Zawadzki, M. J., Juth, V., Benfield, J. A., & Smyth, J. M. (2017). Social interactions in daily life: Within-person associations between momentary social experiences and psychological and physical health indicators. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517691366.Google Scholar
  7. Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  8. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis version 2. Englewood: Biostat.Google Scholar
  9. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Effect sizes based on correlations. Introduction to Meta-Analysis, 41–43.Google Scholar
  10. Brandstätter, H. (1983). Emotional responses to other persons in everyday life situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 871–883.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.871.Google Scholar
  11. Brose, A., Voelkle, M. C., Lövdén, M., Lindenberger, U., & Schmiedek, F. (2015). Differences in the between-person and within-person structures of affect are a matter of degree. European Journal of Personality, 29(1), 55–71.Google Scholar
  12. Burgin, C. J., Brown, L. H., Royal, A., Silvia, P. J., Barrantes-Vidal, N., & Kwapil, T. R. (2012). Being with others and feeling happy: Emotional expressivity in everyday life. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(3), 185–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.006.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Burns, J. W., Gerhart, J. I., Bruehl, S., Post, K. M., Smith, D. A., Porter, L. S., … Keefe, F. J. (2016). Anger arousal and behavioral anger regulation in everyday life among people with chronic low back pain: Relationships with spouse responses and negative affect. Health Psychology, 35(1), 29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bussmann, J. B., Ebner-Priemer, U. W., & Fahrenberg, J. (2009). Ambulatory activity monitoring: Progress in measurement of activity, posture, and specific motion patterns in daily life. European Psychologist, 14(2), 142–152.Google Scholar
  15. Carstensen, L. L., Turan, B., Scheibe, S., Ram, N., Ersner-Hershfield, H., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., … Nesselroade, J. R. (2011). Emotional experience improves with age: evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 21–33.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021285.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97(1), 19.Google Scholar
  17. Charles, S. T., & Gatz, C. A. R. (2001). Age-related differences and change in positive and negative affect over 23 years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Charles, S. T., Piazza, J. R., Mogle, J., Sliwinski, M. J., & Almeida, D. M. (2013). The wear and tear of daily stressors on mental health. Psychological Science, 24(5), 733–741.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Chui, H., Hoppmann, C. A., Gerstorf, D., Walker, R., & Luszcz, M. A. (2014). Social partners and momentary affect in the oldest-old: The presence of others benefits affect depending on who we are and who we are with. Developmental Psychology, 50(3), 728–740.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033896.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cohen, S. (2004). Social relationships and health. American Psychologist, 59(8), 676.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Côté, S., & Moskowitz, D. S. (1998). On the dynamic covariation between interpersonal behavior and affect: Prediction from neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 1032–1046.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.1032.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Cranford, J. A., Shrout, P. E., Iida, M., Rafaeli, E., Yip, T., & Bolger, N. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 917–929.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206287721.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Deindl, C., Brandt, M., & Hank, K. (2016). Social networks, social cohesion, and later-life health. Social Indicators Research, 126(3), 1175–1187.Google Scholar
  24. Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(5), 1105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Diener, E., & Larsen, R. J. (1993). The expereince of emotional well-being. In M. Lewis & J. M. Havilland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Duck, S., Rutt, D. J., Hoy, M., & STREJC, H. H. (1991). Some evident truths about conversations in everyday relationships all communications are not created equal. Human Communication Research, 18(2), 228–267.Google Scholar
  27. Ebner-Priemer, U. W., Houben, M., Santangelo, P., Kleindienst, N., Tuerlinckx, F., Oravecz, Z., … Kuppens, P. (2015). Unraveling affective dysregulation in borderline personality disorder: A theoretical model and empirical evidence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(1), 186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ebner-Priemer, U. W., & Trull, T. J. (2009). Ecological momentary assessment of mood disorders and mood dysregulation. Psychological Assessment, 21(4), 463.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Flory, J. D., Räikkönen, K., Matthews, K. A., & Owens, J. F. (2000). Self-focused attention and mood during everyday social interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(7), 875–883.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200269012.Google Scholar
  30. Fournier, M. A., Moskowitz, D., & Zuroff, D. C. (2011). Origins and applications of the interpersonal circumplex. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment and therapeutic interventions (pp. 57–74). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Fraley, R. C., & Hudson, N. W. (2013). Review of intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. Journal of Social Psychology, 154(1), 89–91.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2013.831300.Google Scholar
  32. Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Geiger, B. B., & MacKerron, G. (2016). Can alcohol make you happy? A subjective wellbeing approach. Social Science & Medicine, 156, 184–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.034.Google Scholar
  34. Geldhof, G. J., Preacher, K. J., & Zyphur, M. J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19(1), 72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Granholm, E., Ben-Zeev, D., Fulford, D., & Swendsen, J. (2013). Ecological Momentary Assessment of social functioning in schizophrenia: Impact of performance appraisals and affect on social interactions. Schizophrenia Research, 145(1–3), 120–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2013.01.005.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hawkley, L. C., Preacher, K. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). Multilevel modeling of social interactions and mood in lonely and socially connected individuals: The MacArthur social neuroscience studies. Oxford University Press. http://hdl.handle.net/1808/1504.
  38. Haynes, S. N., & Yoshioka, D. T. (2007). Clinical assessment applications of ambulatory biosensors. Psychological Assessment, 19(1), 44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hepp, J., Lane, S. P., Carpenter, R. W., Niedtfeld, I., Brown, W. C., & Trull, T. J. (2017). Interpersonal problems and negative affect in borderline personality and depressive disorders in daily life. Clinical Psychological Science, 5(3), 470–484.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702616677312.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hopwood, C. J., Wright, A. G., Ansell, E. B., & Pincus, A. L. (2013). The interpersonal core of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27(3), 270–295.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Houben, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Kuppens, P. (2015). The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 901.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Houtveen, J. H., & de Geus, E. J. (2009). Noninvasive psychophysiological ambulatory recordings: Study design and data analysis strategies. European Psychologist, 14(2), 132–141.Google Scholar
  43. Hsieh, C. S., & Lee, L. F. (2014). A social interactions model with endogenous friendship formation and selectivity. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 31(2), 301–319.Google Scholar
  44. Jahng, S., & Wood, P. K. (2017). Multilevel models for intensive longitudinal data with heterogeneous autoregressive errors: The effect of misspecification and correction with Cholesky transformation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 262.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Jahng, S., Wood, P. K., & Trull, T. J. (2008). Analysis of affective instability in ecological momentary assessment: Indices using successive difference and group comparison via multilevel modeling. Psychological Methods, 13(4), 354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Kamarck, T. W., Janicki, D. L., Shiffman, S., Polk, D. E., Muldoon, M. F., Liebenauer, L. L., & Schwartz, J. E. (2002). Psychosocial demands and ambulatory blood pressure: A field assessment approach. Physiology & Behavior, 77(4), 699–704.Google Scholar
  47. Kamarck, T. W., Schwartz, J. E., Shiffman, S., Muldoon, M. F., Sutton-Tyrrell, K., & Janicki, D. L. (2005). Psychosocial stress and cardiovascular risk: What is the role of daily experience? Journal of Personality, 73(6), 1749–1774.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Kashdan, T. B., Yarbro, J., McKnight, P. E., & Nezlek, J. B. (2014). Laughter with someone else leads to future social rewards: Temporal change using experience sampling methodology. Personality and Individual Differences, 58, 15–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.09.025.Google Scholar
  49. Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2001). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health, 78(3), 458–467.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Kiesler, D. J., Schmidt, J. A., & Wagner, C. C. (1997). A circumplex inventory of impact messages: An operational bridge between emotion and interpersonal behavior. In R. Plutchik & H. Conte (Eds.), Circumplex models of personality and emotions (pp. 221–244). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  51. Kim, S. H., & Hamann, S. (2007). Neural correlates of positive and negative emotion regulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(5), 776–798.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Larsen, R. J., & Ketelaar, T. (1991). Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(1), 132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Larson, R., Mannell, R., & Zuzanek, J. (1985). Being alone versus being with people: Disengagement in the daily experience of older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 40(3), 375–381.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Larson, R., Mannell, R., & Zuzanek, J. (1986). Daily well-being of older adults with friends and family. Psychology and Aging, 1(2), 117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Litwin, H., & Shiovitz-Ezra, S. (2006). The association between activity and wellbeing in later life: What really matters? Ageing and Society, 26(02), 225–242.Google Scholar
  56. Litwin, H., & Shiovitz-Ezra, S. (2011). Social network type and subjective well-being in a national sample of older Americans. Gerontologist, 51(3), 379–388.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Lucas, R. E., Le, K., & Dyrenforth, P. S. (2008). Explaining the extraversion/positive affect relation: Sociability cannot account for extraverts’ greater happiness. Journal of Personality, 76(3), 385–414.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. MacKerron, G., & Mourato, S. (2013). Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 992–1000.Google Scholar
  59. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Nezlek, J. B. (2017). A practical guide to understanding reliability in studies of within-person variability. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 149–155.Google Scholar
  61. Pauly, T., Lay, J. C., Nater, U. M., Scott, S. B., & Hoppmann, C. A. (2017). How we experience being alone: Age differences in affective and biological correlates of momentary solitude. Gerontology, 63(1), 55–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Portell, M., Anguera, M. T., Hernandez-Mendo, A., & Jonsson, G. K. (2015). Quantifying biopsychosocial aspects in everyday contexts: An integrative methodological approach from the behavioral sciences. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 8, 153–160.  https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S82417.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Posner, J., Russell, J. A., & Peterson, B. S. (2005). The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 17(3), 715–734.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Ram, N., Conroy, D. E., Pincus, A. L., Lorek, A., Rebar, A., Roche, M. J., … Gerstorf, D. (2014). Examining the interplay of processes across multiple time-scales: Illustration with the Intraindividual Study of Affect, Health, and Interpersonal Behavior (iSAHIB). Research in Human Development, 11(2), 142–160.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Thousand Okas: Sage.Google Scholar
  66. Roche, M. J., Pincus, A. L., Hyde, A. L., Conroy, D. E., & Ram, N. (2013). Within-person covariation of agentic and communal perceptions: Implications for interpersonal theory and assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(4), 445–452.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Röcke, C., & Brose, A. (2013). Intraindividual variability and stability of affect and well-being. Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry, 26(3), 185–199.  https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000094.Google Scholar
  68. Rocke, C., Li, S. C., & Smith, J. (2009). Intraindividual variability in positive and negative affect over 45 days: Do older adults fluctuate less than young adults? Psychology of Aging, 24(4), 863–878.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016276.Google Scholar
  69. Rook, K. S., Mavandadi, S., Sorkin, D. H., & Zettel, L. A. (2007). Optimizing social relationships as a resource for health and well-being in later life. In C. M. Aldwin, C. L. Park, A. Spiro (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology and aging (pp. 267–285). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  70. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities Social.Google Scholar
  71. Russell, J. J., Moskowitz, D., Zuroff, D. C., Sookman, D., & Paris, J. (2007). Stability and variability of affective experience and interpersonal behavior in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116(3), 578.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Sadikaj, G., Moskowitz, D., Russell, J. J., Zuroff, D. C., & Paris, J. (2013). Quarrelsome behavior in borderline personality disorder: Influence of behavioral and affective reactivity to perceptions of others. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(1), 195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Sadikaj, G., Moskowitz, D., & Zuroff, D. C. (2011). Attachment-related affective dynamics: Differential reactivity to others’ interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 905.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Sadikaj, G., Russell, J. J., Moskowitz, D., & Paris, J. (2010). Affect dysregulation in individuals with borderline personality disorder: Persistence and interpersonal triggers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(6), 490–500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Sandstrom, G. M., & Dunn, E. W. (2014). Social interactions and well-being: The surprising power of weak ties. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(7), 910–922.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Sandstrom, G. M., Lathia, N., Mascolo, C., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2017). Putting mood in context: Using smartphones to examine how people feel in different locations. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 96–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.004.Google Scholar
  77. Schneider, J. A., Cornwell, B., Ostrow, D., Michaels, S., Schumm, P., Laumann, E. O., & Friedman, S. (2013). Network mixing and network influences most linked to HIV infection and risk behavior in the HIV epidemic among black men who have sex with men. American Journal of Public Health, 103(1), e28–e36.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Schwartz, J. E., & Stone, A. A. (2007). The analysis of real-time momentary data: A practical guide. In A. A. Stone, S. S. Shiffman, A. Atienza & L. Nebeling (Eds.), The science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research (pp. 76–113). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Shiffman, S. (2000). Real-time self-report of momentary states in the natural environment: Computerized ecological momentary assessment. The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice, 277–296.Google Scholar
  80. Shockley, K. M., Ispas, D., Rossi, M. E., & Levine, E. L. (2012). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between state affect, discrete emotions, and job performance. Human Performance, 25(5), 377–411.Google Scholar
  81. Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 7(3–4), 233–269.Google Scholar
  82. Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (1994). Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in behavorial medicine. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16(3), 199–202.Google Scholar
  83. Thoits, P. A. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(2), 145–161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 227–242.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106297301.Google Scholar
  85. Timmermans, T., Van Mechelen, I., & Kuppens, P. (2010). The relationship between individual differences in intraindividual variability in core affect and interpersonal behaviour. European Journal of Personality, 24(8), 623–638.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.756.Google Scholar
  86. Torquati, J. C., & Raffaelli, M. (2004). Daily experiences of emotions and social contexts of securely and insecurely attached young adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19(6), 740–758.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558403260023.Google Scholar
  87. Trull, T. J., & Ebner-Priemer, U. W. (2009). Using experience sampling methods/ecological momentary assessment (ESM/EMA) in clinical assessment and clinical research: Introduction to the special section. Psychological Assessment, 21(4), 457–462.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Tsai, J. L. (2007). Ideal affect: Cultural causes and behavioral consequences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(3), 242–259.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Uchino, B. N. (2006). Social support and health: A review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to disease outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29(4), 377–387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Vasconcelos e Sa, D., Wearden, A., Hartley, S., Emsley, R., & Barrowclough, C. (2016). Expressed emotion and behaviourally controlling interactions in the daily life of dyads experiencing psychosis. Psychiatry Research, 245, 406–413.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.08.060.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Vella, E. J., Kamarck, T. W., Flory, J. D., & Manuck, S. (2012). Hostile mood and social strain during daily life: A test of the transactional model. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 44(3), 341–352.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9400-7.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Vittengl, J. R., & Holt, C. S. (1998a). Positive and negative affect in social interactions as a function of partner familiarity, quality of communication, and social anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17(2), 196–208.  https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1998.17.2.196.Google Scholar
  93. Vittengl, J. R., & Holt, C. S. (1998b). A time-series diary study of mood and social interaction. Motivation and Emotion, 22(3), 255–275.Google Scholar
  94. Vogel, N., Ram, N., Conroy, D. E., Pincus, A. L., & Gerstorf, D. (2017). How the social ecology and social situation shape individuals’ affect valence and arousal. Emotion, 17(3), 509–527.  https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000244.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Wang, S., Roche, M. J., Pincus, A. L., Conroy, D. E., Rebar, A. L., & Ram, N. (2014). Interpersonal dependency and emotion in every day life. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 5–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.007.Google Scholar
  96. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 820.Google Scholar
  98. Wenze, S. J., & Miller, I. W. (2010). Use of ecological momentary assessment in mood disorders research. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(6), 794–804.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Wethington, E., Pillemer, K., & Principi, A. (2016). Research in social gerontology: Social exclusion of aging adults social exclusion (pp. 177–195). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  100. Wichers, M., Kasanova, Z., Bakker, J., Thiery, E., Derom, C., Jacobs, N., & van Os, J. (2015). From affective experience to motivated action: Tracking reward-seeking and punishment-avoidant behaviour in real-life. PLoS One, 10(6), e0129722–e0129722.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129722.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Wilhelm, F. H., & Grossman, P. (2010). Emotions beyond the laboratory: Theoretical fundaments, study design, and analytic strategies for advanced ambulatory assessment. Biological Psychology, 84(3), 552–569.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Wilhelm, P., & Schoebi, D. (2007). Assessing mood in daily life. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 258–267.Google Scholar
  103. Wolff, J. K., Schmiedek, F., Brose, A., & Lindenberger, U. (2013). Physical and emotional well-being and the balance of needed and received emotional support: Age differences in a daily diary study. Social Science & Medicine, 91, 67–75.Google Scholar
  104. Wolff-Hughes, D. L., Conroy, R., McClain, J. J., Nilsen, W. J., & Riley, W. T. (2018). Building the infrastructure to accelerate evidence-generating mobile and wireless health research: National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation perspectives. Translational Behavioral Medicine.  https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibx036.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Wrzus, C., & Mehl, M. R. (2015). Lab and/or field? Measuring personality processes and their social consequences. European Journal of Personality, 29(2), 250–271.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1986.Google Scholar
  106. Yang, Y. C., Boen, C., Gerken, K., Li, T., Schorpp, K., & Harris, K. M. (2016). Social relationships and physiological determinants of longevity across the human life span. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 578–583.Google Scholar
  107. Zheng, Y., Plomin, R., & von Stumm, S. (2016). Heritability of intraindividual mean and variability of positive and negative affect: Genetic analysis of daily affect ratings over a month. Psychological Science, 27(12), 1611–1619.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huiying Liu
    • 1
  • Qian Wen Xie
    • 1
  • Vivian W. Q. Lou
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Social Work & Social AdministrationUniversity of Hong KongHong KongChina
  2. 2.Sau Po Center on AgeingThe University of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations