Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 218–231 | Cite as

Comparing the current and long-term career motivations of artists and business-people: Is everyone intrinsic in the end?

  • Kennon M. SheldonEmail author
  • Mike Corcoran
Original Paper

Abstract

We considered the interplay of intrinsic and external career motivation by comparing two relevant vocational groups: artists and businesspersons. In Study 1 business students, relative to art students, reported more external and less intrinsic motivations for their current majors, and aspired more to money, status, and appearance in the future. However, the two groups were no different on intrinsic future aspirations for growth, connection, and contribution. In Study 2 business students again had more external and less intrinsic career motivation. However, they were again no different in their intrinsic future aspirations, and also, were no different from art students in their longer-term career motivations. Study 3 used a sample of mTurk workers and replicated the basic pattern of three-way interactions. Physical scientists/science students, also examined in all studies, tended to have current and longer-term motivations lying midway between the art and business groups. Consistent with organismic perspectives on human nature, it appears that everyone aspires for a meaningful and enjoyable future; however, business types may put off these motivations in the present, whereas artistic types pursue them directly. This lends support to the notion that despite motivational differences in the present, everyone desires to be intrinsic in the end.

Keywords

Career motivation Self-determination theory Long-term motivation 

Notes

Funding

The study has been partially funded by the Russian Academic Excellence Project ‘5-100’.

References

  1. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder: Westview press.Google Scholar
  2. Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950–967.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.950.Google Scholar
  3. Antin, J., & Shaw, A. (2012, May). Social desirability bias and self-reports of motivation: a study of amazon mechanical turk in the US and India. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsCHI12.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208699.Google Scholar
  4. Barron, F. (1963). Creativity and psychological health: Origins of personal vitality and creative freedom. Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  5. Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Basham, R. E., & Buchanan, F. R. (2009). A survey comparison of career motivations of social work and business students. Journal of Social Work Education, 45(2), 187–208.  https://doi.org/10.5175/jswe.2009.200600112.Google Scholar
  7. Bishop, D. I., Thomas, R. W., & Peper, B. M. (2000). Levels of personal agency among academic majors. Psychological Reports, 86(1), 221–224.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2000.86.1.221.Google Scholar
  8. Buchanan, F. R., Kim, K. H., & Basham, R. (2007). Career orientations of business master’s students as compared to social work students: Further inquiry into the value of graduate education. Career Development International, 12(3), 282–303.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430710745908.Google Scholar
  9. Cattell, R. B. (1963). The personality and motivation of the researcher from measurements of contemporaries and from biography. In C. W. Taylor & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development. New York: John Wiley, 1963.Google Scholar
  10. Chandra, S. (1965). Students’ images of some occupational groups. Indian Journal of Psychology, 40(3), 101–105.Google Scholar
  11. Collins, J. W. (1996). Intellectual motivation and its relationship to selected characteristics of collegiate business and liberal arts majors. Dissertation Abstracts International. Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 56(10-A), 3886.Google Scholar
  12. Deci, E. L. (1972). The effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8(2), 217–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(72)90047-5.Google Scholar
  13. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7.Google Scholar
  14. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1990). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. D. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 38, Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  15. Elias, D. M., & Berg-Cross, L. (2009). An exploration of motivations of fine art students in relation to mental and physical well-being. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 23(4), 228–238.  https://doi.org/10.1080/87568220903163850.Google Scholar
  16. Feist, G. J. (1991). Synthetic and analytic thought: Similarities and differences among art and science students. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 145–155.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534382.Google Scholar
  17. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  18. Kasser, T. (2002). Sketches for a self-determination theory of values. In E. Deci & R. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 123–140). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 410–422.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.410.Google Scholar
  20. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 280–287.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296223006.Google Scholar
  21. Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analyses of big six interests and big five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 217–239.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1854.Google Scholar
  22. Li, Y., Sheldon, K. M., & Liu, R. (2015). Dialectical thinking moderates the effect of extrinsic motivation on intrinsic motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 89–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.03.019.Google Scholar
  23. Maliszewski, N., Kuźmińska, A. O., Wieczorkowska-Wierzbińska, G., & Werner-Maliszewska, A. (2014). The impact of explicit and implicit power motivation on educational choices. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 45(3), 275–285.  https://doi.org/10.2478/ppb-2014-0034.Google Scholar
  24. Niemiec, C. P., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). The path taken: Consequences of attaining intrinsic and extrinsic aspirations in post-college life. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 291–306.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.09.001.Google Scholar
  25. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68.Google Scholar
  26. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ryan, R. M., Sheldon, K. M., Kasser, T., & Deci, E. L. (1996). All goals are not created equal: An organismic perspective on the nature of goals and their regulation. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 7–26). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  28. Sheldon, K. M. (1995). Creativity and goal conflict. Creativity Research Journal, 8(3), 299–306.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0803_9.Google Scholar
  29. Sheldon, K. M. (2009). Goal-striving across the life-span: Do people learn to select more self-concordant goals as they age? In M. C. Smith & T. G. Reio (Eds.), The handbook of research on adult development and learning (pp. 553–569). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Sheldon, K. M. (2014). Becoming oneself: The central role of self-concordant goal selection. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(4), 349–365.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314538549.Google Scholar
  31. Sheldon, K. M., Arndt, J., & Houser-Marko, L. (2003). In search of the organismic valuing process: The human tendency to move towards beneficial goal choices. Journal of Personality, 71(5), 835–869.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.7105006.Google Scholar
  32. Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well being: the self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 482–497.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.482.Google Scholar
  33. Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1995). Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 531–543.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.531.Google Scholar
  34. Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (2001). Getting older, getting better? Personal strivings and personality development across the life-course. Developmental Psychology, 37, 491–501.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.491.Google Scholar
  35. Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (2008). Psychological threat and extrinsic goal striving. Motivation and Emotion, 32(1), 37–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9081-5.Google Scholar
  36. Sheldon, K. M., Kasser, T., Houser-Marko, L., Jones, T., & Turban, D. (2005). Doing one’s duty: Chronological age, felt autonomy, and subjective well-being. European Journal of Personality, 19(2), 97–115.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.535.Google Scholar
  37. Sheldon, K. M., & Krieger, L. K. (2007). Understanding the negative effects of legal education on law students: A longitudinal test of self-determination theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 883–897.Google Scholar
  38. Sheldon, K. M., & Krieger, L. S. (2014). Service job lawyers are happier than money job lawyers, despite their lower income. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(3), 219–226.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.888583.Google Scholar
  39. Sheldon, K. M., Osin, E. N., Gordeeva, T. O., Suchkov, D. D., & Sychev, O. A. (2017). Evaluating the dimensionality of self-determination theory’s relative autonomy continuum. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(9), 1215–1238.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217711915.Google Scholar
  40. Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Kasser, T. (2004). The independent effects of goal contents and motives on well-being: It’s both what you pursue and why you pursue it. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 475–486.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203261883.Google Scholar
  41. Skatova, A., & Ferguson, E. (2014). Why do different people choose different university degrees? Motivation and the choice of degree. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1244), 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01244.Google Scholar
  42. Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 43–75). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 271–360.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60019-2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychological SciencesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations