Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 63–81 | Cite as

Self-control motivationally reconsidered: “Acting” self-controlled is different to “being good” at self-control

  • Axel GrundEmail author
  • Christoph-Alexander Carstens
Original Paper

Abstract

Self-control is typically conceptualized as an inherent human skill, focusing on the imperative control of thoughts, feelings, and behavior. In the present research, we scrutinize this understanding by differentiating between an ability self-concept of self-control strength and experiential acts of self-control. Moreover, by taking a motivational perspective, we analyze how much of a role intrapsychic conflict plays in both conceptions of self-control, and with regard to psychological well-being. In cross-sectional Study 1 (N = 228), we compared a typicality measure of experiential acts of imperative self-control with the widely used Self-Control Scale (Tangney et al. in J Pers 72:271–322, 2004). Findings confirm that “being good” at self-control does not correspond to “acting” self-controlled, and that both measures show opposing relationships to intrapsychic conflict, as well as to well-being. In Study 2 (N = 114), we corroborated these findings by using an experience-sampling approach. Multilevel analyses showed that between-person differences (Level 2) in self-control strength were generally unrelated to experiential acts of self-control in everyday life. By contrast, we found a positive Level 2 effect for acting self-controlled. With regard to momentary affect, both between- and within differences (Level 1) in acting self-controlled served as substantial predictors, in addition to momentary self-determination. Other context-dependent effects (i.e., studying vs. leisure time) further emphasize the need to consider motivational interpretations of self-control (strength).

Keywords

Intrapsychic conflict Motivation Self-control Self-determination Well-being Willpower 

Notes

Funding

This research was supported by a research grant of the Bielelder Nachwuchsfond, Bielefeld University, Germany, to Axel Grund.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human and animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

11031_2018_9721_MOESM1_ESM.doc (60 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 60 KB)

References

  1. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, M., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M., DeWall, C. N., & Oaten, M. (2006). Self-regulation and personality: How interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. Journal of Personality, 74, 1773–1801.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00428.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996). Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0701_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bembenutty, H., & Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Inherent association between academic delay of gratification, future time perspective, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 35–57.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000012344.34008.5c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertrams, A., & Dickhäuser, O. (2009). Messung dispositioneller Selbstkontroll-Kapazität: Eine deutsche Adaptation der Kurzform der Self-Control Scale (SCS-K-D) [Measuring dispositional self-control capacity. A German adaptation of the short form of the Self-Control Scale]. Diagnostica, 55, 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carter, E. C., Kofler, L. M., Forster, D. E., & McCullough, M. E. (2015). A series of meta-analytic tests of the depletion effect: Self-control does not seem to rely on a limited resource. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 796–815.  https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd edn.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. de Ridder, D., Lensvelt-Mulders, G., Finkenauer, C. F., Stok, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2012). Taking stock of self-control: A meta-analysis of how trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 76–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Ridder, D. T. D., de Boer, B. J., Lugtig, P., Bakker, A. B., & van Hooft, E. A. J. (2011). Not doing bad things is not equivalent to doing the right thing: Distinguishing between inhibitory and initiatory self-control. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1006–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and the “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duckworth, A. L., Gendler, T. S., & Gross, J. J. (2016). Situational strategies for self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 35–55.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615623247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duckworth, A. L., Tsukayama, E., & Kirby, T. A. (2013). Is it really self-control? Examining the predictive power of the delay of gratification task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 843–855.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213482589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Englert, C., & Rummel, J. (2016). I want to keep on exercising but I don’t: The negative impact of momentary lacks of self-control on exercise adherence. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 26, 24–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fishbach, A., & Shah, J. Y. (2006). Self-control in action: Implicit dispositions toward goals and away from temptations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 820–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fries, S., Dietz, F., & Schmid, S. (2008). Motivational interference in learning: The impact of leisure alternatives on subsequent self-regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fries, S., Schmid, S., Dietz, F., & Hofer, M. (2005). Conflicting values and their impact on learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20, 259–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fries, S., Schmid, S., & Hofer, M. (2007). On the relationship between value orientation, valences, and academic achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Friese, M., & Hofmann, W. (2016). State mindfulness, self-regulation, and emotional experience in everyday life. Motivation Science, 2, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fujita, K. (2011). On conceptualizing self-control as more than the effortful inhibition of impulses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 352–366.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Galla, B. M., & Duckworth, A. L. (2015). More than resisting temptation: Beneficial habits mediate the relationship between self-control and positive life outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 508–525.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Galla, B. M., & Wood, J. J. (2015). Trait self-control predicts adolescents’ exposure and reactivity to daily stressful events. Journal of Personality, 83, 69–83.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grund, A., Brassler, N. K., & Fries, S. (2014). Torn between study and leisure: How motivational conflicts relate to students’ academic and social adaptation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 242–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grund, A., & Fries, S. (2012). Motivational interference in study-leisure conflicts: How opportunity costs affect the self-regulation of university students. Educational Psychology, 32, 589–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grund, A., & Fries, S. (2014). Study and leisure interference as mediators between students’ self-control capacities and their domain-specific functioning and general well-being. Learning and Instruction, 31, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grund, A., & Fries, S. (2018). Understanding procrastination: A motivational approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 121, 120–130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grund, A., Fries, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2018). Know your preferences: Self-regulation as need-congruent goal selection. Review of General Psychology.Google Scholar
  31. Grund, A., Grunschel, C., Bruhn, D., & Fries, S. (2015). Torn between want and should: An experience-sampling study on motivational conflict, well-being, self-control, and mindfulness. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 506–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grund, A., Schmid, S., & Fries, S. (2015). Studying against your will: Motivational interference in action. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 209–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grund, A., & Senker, K. (2018). Motivational foundations of self-control and mindfulness and their role in studyleisure conflicts. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  34. Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2012). Multilevel modeling of categorical outcomes using IBM SPSS. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Hofer, M., Kuhnle, C., Kilian, B., & Fries, S. (2012). Cognitive ability and personality variables as predictors of school grades and test scores in adolescents. Learning and Instruction, 22, 368–375.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hofer, M., Schmid, S., Fries, S., Dietz, F., Clausen, M., & Reinders, H. (2007). Individual values, motivational conflicts, and learning for school. Learning and Instruction, 17, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hofmann, W., Baumeister, R. F., Förster, G., & Vohs, K. D. (2012). Everyday temptations: An experience sampling study on desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1318–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hofmann, W., Luhmann, M., Fisher, R., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2014). Yes, but are they happy? Effects of trait self-control on affective well-being and life satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 82, 265–277.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hofmann, W., & Patel, P. V. (2015). SurveySignal: A convenient solution for experience sampling research using participants’ own smartphones. Social Science Computer Review, 33, 235–253.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314525117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd edn.). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Inzlicht, M., Bartholow, B. D., & Hirsh, J. B. (2015). Emotional foundations of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 126–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Inzlicht, M., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2012). What is ego depletion? Toward a mechanistic revision of the resource model of self-control. Psychological Science, 7, 450–463.Google Scholar
  43. Job, V., Dweck, C. S., & Walton, G. M. (2010). Ego depletion—Is it all in your head? Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation. Psychological Science, 21, 1686–1693.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kotabe, H. P., & Hofmann, W. (2015). On integrating the components of self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 618–638.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615593382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C.-W., & Tausch, A. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der “Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (PANAS). [Investigations with a German version of the PANAS]. Diagnostica, 42, 139–156.Google Scholar
  46. Kuhl, J., & Beckmann, J. (1994). Alienation: Ignoring one’s preferences. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp. 375–390). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  47. Kuhl, J., & Fuhrmann, A. (1998). Decomposing self-regulation and self-control: The volitional components checklist. In J. Heckhausen & C. Dweck (Eds.), Life span perspectives on motivation and control (pp. 15–49). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  48. Kuhnle, C., Hofer, M., & Kilian, B. (2010). The relationship of value orientations, self-control, frequency of school–leisure conflicts, and life-balance in adolescence. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 251–255.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3–19.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Milyavskaya, M., & Inzlicht, M. (2017). What’s so great about self-control? Examining the importance of effortful self-control and temptation in predicting real-life depletion and goal attainment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 603–611.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616679237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Milyavskaya, M., Inzlicht, M., Hope, N., & Koestner, R. (2015). Saying ‘No’ to temptation: ‘Want-to’ motivation improves self-regulation by reducing temptation rather than by increasing self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 677–693.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Muraven, M. (2008). Autonomous self-control is less depleting. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 763–770.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Muraven, M. (2010). Building self-control strength: Practicing self-control leads to improved self-control performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 465–468.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Muraven, M., & Slessareva, E. (2003). Mechanisms of self-control failure: Motivation and limited resources. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 894–906.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029007008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Muraven, M., Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Self-control as a limited resource: Regulatory depletion patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 774–789.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, R., & Ryan, R. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rheinberg, F., & Engeser, S. (2010). Motive training and motivational competence. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit Motives (pp. 510–548). Oxford: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ryan, R. M., Koestner, R., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Ego-involved persistence: When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated. Motivation and Emotion, 15, 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Saunders, B., Milyavskaya, M., Etz, A., Randles, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2018, January 19). Reported self-control is not meaningfully associated with inhibition-related executive function: A Bayesian analysis.  https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BXFSU.
  61. Schallberger, U. (2005). Kurzskala zur Erfassung der positiven Aktivierung, negativen Aktivierung und Valenz in Experience Sampling Studien (PANAVA-KS) [Scales for assessing positive/negative activation and valence in experience sampling studies]. Research report. Retrieved March 2, 2013, from http://www.research-projects.uzh.ch/p6975.htm.
  62. Senécal, C., Julien, E., & Guay, F. (2003). Role conflict and academic procrastination: A self-determination perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Not all goals are personal goals: Comparing autonomous and controlled reasons for goals as predictors of effort and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 546–557.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298245010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1995). Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sokolowski, K. (1997). Sequentielle und Imperative Konzepte des Willens [Sequential and imperative theories of volition]. Psychologische Beiträge, 39, 346–369.Google Scholar
  66. Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Longitudinal study of procrastination, performance, stress, and health: The costs and benefits of dawdling. Psychological Science, 8, 454–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Trautwein, U. (2004). Die temporalen Facetten der Lebenszufriedenheit: Eine deutsche Adaptation der Skala von Pavot, Diener und Suh (1998) [The temporal facet of life satisfaction]. Diagnostica, 50, 182–192.  https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.50.4.182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Weinert, F. (1987). Bildhafte Vorstellungen des Willens [Metaphoric conceptions of will]. In H. Heckhausen, P. M. Gollwitzer & F. Weinert (Eds.), Jenseits des Rubikon: Der Wille in den Humanwissenschaften (pp. 10–26). Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyBielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations