Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 852–870 | Cite as

Postactional goal pursuit: Consequences of task completion for thought content, affect, and behavioral intentions

  • Sean M. McCrea
  • Richard J. Vann
Original Paper
  • 96 Downloads

Abstract

Postactional goal pursuit remains an underexplored area of the mindset theory of action phases. According to the theory, individuals enter a postactional phase following the completion of an intention. This phase focuses on evaluating goal outcomes, answering questions such as: Was the goal completed successfully? Was it worth the effort? Contrasting postactional phase with predecisional and actional goal pursuit, the present research examines differences in cognitive orientation, affective responses to feedback, and functional benefits for adapting subsequent goal pursuit. Five experiments show that postactional goal pursuit engenders outcome-focused deliberation, more intense affect in reaction to the current state of goal pursuit, and increased readiness to adapt subsequent goal pursuit to experienced outcomes. Moving beyond conceptual arguments, the present work provides initial evidence that postactional goal pursuit provokes a mindset-like shift suitable for a phase-specific task of outcome evaluation.

Keywords

Goals Mindset theory Action phases Evaluation mindset Aspiration levels 

References

  1. Achtziger, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2010). Motivation und Volition im Handlungsverlauf. In J. Heckhausen & H. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation und Handeln (pp. 309–335). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Achtziger, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2018). Motivation in the course of action. In J. Heckhausen & H. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation and action (3rd ed.). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Armor, D. A., & Taylor, S. E. (2003). The effects of mindset on behavior: Self-regulation in deliberative and implemental frames of mind. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(1), 86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 50, 248–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bayer, U. C., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2005). Mindset effects on information search in self-evaluation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beckmann, J. (1994). Ruminative thought and the deactivation of an intention. Motivation & Emotion, 18, 317–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beckmann, J., & Heckhausen, H. (1988). Handlungsbewertung und Aufmerksamskeitsumschaltung Jahrbuch 1988 der Max-Plank-Gesselschaft. Munich: Vandenhoeck & Rupprecht.Google Scholar
  8. Bless, H., & Fiedler, K. (2006). Mood and the regulation of information processing and behavior. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Affect in social thinking and behavior (pp. 65–84). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brandstätter, V., Giesinger, L., Job, V., & Frank, E. (2015). The role of deliberative versus implemental mindsets in time prediction and task accomplishment. Social Psychology, 46, 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brandstätter, V., & Schüler, J. (2013). Action crisis and cost-benefit thinking: A cognitive analysis of a goal-disengagement phase. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 543–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Büttner, O. B., Florack, A., & Göritz, A. S. (2013). Shopping orientation and mindsets: How motivation influences consumer information processing during shopping. Psychology & Marketing, 30(9), 779–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Büttner, O. B., Wieber, F., Schulz, A. M., Bayer, U. C., Florack, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2014). Visual attention and goal pursuit: Deliberative and implemental mindsets affect breadth of attention. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 40, 1248–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carver, C. S. (2003). Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect. Cognition & Emotion, 17, 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97(1), 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheema, A., & Patrick, V. M. (2008). Anytime versus only: Mind-sets moderate the effect of expansive versus restrictive frames on promotion evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(4), 462–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dai, H., Milkman, K. L., & Riis, J. (2014). The fresh start effect: Temporal landmarks motivate aspirational behavior. Management Science, 60(10), 2563–2582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Doerflinger, J. T., Martiny-Huenger, T., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2017). Planning to deliberate thoroughly: If-then planned deliberation increases the adjustment of decisions to newly available information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Epstude, K., & Roese, N. J. (2008). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 12, 168–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feick, D. L., & Rhodewalt, F. (1997). The double-edged sword of self-handicapping: Discounting, augmentation, and the protection and enhancement of self-esteem. Motivation & Emotion, 21(2), 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Forgas, J. P. (2013). Don’t worry, be sad! On the cognitive, motivational, and interpersonal benefits of negative mood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fujita, K., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2007). Mindsets and pre-conscious open-mindedness to incidental information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(1), 48–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gendolla, G. H. E. (1997). Surprise in the context of achievement: The role of outcome of outcome valence and importance. Motivation and Emotion, 21, 165–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol 2, pp. 53–92). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gollwitzer, P. M. (2012). Mindset theory of action phases. In P. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol 1, pp. 526–545). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Keller, L. (2016). Mindset theory. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Kinney, R. F. (1989). Effects of deliberative and implemental mind-sets on illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(4), 531–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harmon-Jones, C., Schmeichel, B. J., Mennitt, E., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2011). The expression of determination: Similarities between anger and approach-related positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 172–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heckhausen, H. (1987). Wünschen — Wählen — Wollen. In H. Heckhausen, P. Gollwitzer & F. Weinert (Eds.), Jenseits des Rubikon (pp. 3–9). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heckhausen, H., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1987). Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind. Motivation & Emotion, 11, 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Henderson, M. D., de Liver, Y., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). The effects of an implemental mind-set on attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(3), 396–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keller, L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2017). Mindset affect risk perception and risk-taking behavior: Illusory optimism and the BART. Social Psychology, 48, 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kray, L. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2003). The debiasing effect of counterfactual mind-sets: Increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in group decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(1), 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 701–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L. A., & Sears, P. S. (1944). Level of aspiration. In J. M. Hunt (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders (pp. 333–378). New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  39. Maglio, S. J., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2014). Emotion and control in the planning of goals. Motivation and Emotion, 38(5), 620–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Markman, K. D., & McMullen, M. N. (2003). A reflection and evaluation model of comparative thinking. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 7, 244–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McFarland, C., & Ross, M. (1982). Impact of causal attributions on affective reactions to success and failure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 43(5), 937–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McFarlin, D. B., & Blascovitch, J. (1984). On the Remote Associates Test (RAT) as an alternative to illusory performance feedback: A methodological note. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 5, 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nenkov, G. Y., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2012). Pre-versus postdecisional deliberation and goal commitment: The positive effects of defensiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 106–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nummenmaa, L., & Niemi, P. (2004). Inducing affective states with success-failure manipulations: A meta-analysis. Emotion, 4(2), 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Puca, R. (2004). Action phases and goal setting: Being optimistic after decision making without getting into trouble. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 121–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Puca, R. M. (2001). Preferred difficulty and subjective probability in different action phases. Motivation and Emotion, 25(4), 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rahn, J., Jaudas, A., & Achtziger, A. (2016a). To plan or not to plan: Mindset effects on visual attention in decision making. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 9, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rahn, J., Jaudas, A., & Achtziger, A. (2016b). A mind for money: Dynamic mindset effects on smart risk taking. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 9, 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sedikides, C. (2012). Self-protection. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 327–353). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  51. Sedikides, C., & Strube, M. J. (1997). Self-evaluation: To thine own self be good, to thine own self be sure, to thine own self be true, and to thy own self be better. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol 29, pp. 209–269). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  52. Taylor, S. E., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1995). Effects of mindset on positive illusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Trope, Y. (1986). Self-enhancement and self-assessment in achievement behavior. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 350–378). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  54. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Trope, Y., & Pomerantz, E. M. (1998). Resolving conflicts among self-evaluative motives: Positive experiences as a resource for overcoming defensiveness. Motivation and Emotion, 22(1), 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 57, 660–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vann, R. J., Rosa, J. A., & McCrea, S. M. (2018). When consumers struggle: Action crisis and its effects on problematic goal pursuit. Psychology and Marketing.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wyer, R. S., & Xu, A. J. (2010). The role of behavioral mind-sets in goal-directed activity: Conceptual underpinnings and empirical evidence. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(2), 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Xu, A. J., & Wyer, R. S. (2008). The comparative mind-set from animal comparisons to increased purchase intentions. Psychological Science, 19(9), 859–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Xu, A. J., & Wyer, R. S. (2012). The role of bolstering and counterarguing mind-sets in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 920–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA
  2. 2.Penn State BehrendErieUSA

Personalised recommendations