Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 615–637 | Cite as

The development and validation of an implicit measure of competence need satisfaction

  • Jolene van der Kaap-Deeder
  • Jan De Houwer
  • Sean Hughes
  • Adriaan Spruyt
  • Maarten Vansteenkiste
Original Paper

Abstract

Research on self-determination theory has typically relied on explicit measures when examining the concept of competence need satisfaction. As a result, we know relatively little about competence need satisfaction that arises under conditions of automaticity. Across four studies, we developed and validated implicit measures of competence need satisfaction by drawing on two tasks: a relational variant of the implicit association test (IAT; Study 1, 3, and 4) and the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP; Study 2–3). Results across these studies revealed that both implicit measures were either unrelated or moderately related to their explicit counterpart. They were also unrelated to one another. Unlike the IRAP, the IAT was found to be reliable, to display discriminant validity, and to yield meaningful but modest relations with constructs in a nomological network. Together, these results provide modest support for the usefulness of the competence need satisfaction IAT but not of the competence need satisfaction IRAP as an implicit measure of the need for competence. Future research examining the unique predictive value of this IAT is needed, together with research on possible explanations for the low reliability of the IRAP.

Keywords

Competence Implicit association test Implicit relational assessment procedure Self-determination theory Implicit 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Preparation of this paper was supported by Grant 12X5818N of the Research Foundation—Flanders and Methusalem Grant BOF16/MET_V/002 of Ghent University.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Research involving human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Asendorpf, J. B., Banse, R., & Mucke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380–393.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.2.380.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, J. W. (Ed.). (1958). Motives in fantasy, action, and society: A method of assessment and study. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, J. W., & Feather, N. (1966). A theory of achievement motivation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., & Boles, S. (2010). A sketch of the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) and the relational elaboration and coherence (REC) model. The Psychological Record, 60, 527–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Mouratidis, A., Katartzi, E., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., & Vlachopoulos, S. (2018). Beware of your teaching style: A school-year long investigation of controlling teaching and student motivational experiences. Learning and Instruction, 53, 50–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., Bosch, J. A., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Self-determination theory and diminished functioning: The role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1459–1473.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211413125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bois, J. E., Sarrazin, P. G., Brustad, R. J., Trouilloud, D. O., & Cury, F. (2002). Mothers’ expectancies and young adolescents’ perceived physical competence: A yearlong study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 22, 384–406.  https://doi.org/10.1177/027243102237189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boone, L., Soenens, B., Braet, C., & Goossens, L. (2010). An empirical typology of perfectionism in early-to-mid adolescents and its relation with eating disorder symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 686–691.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2010.03.022.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Boone, L., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., & Verstuyf, J. (2014). Self-critical perfectionism and binge eating symptoms: A longitudinal test of the intervening role of psychological need frustration. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61, 363–373.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036418.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Brunstein, J. C., & Schmitt, C. H. (2004). Assessing individual differences in achievement motivation with the implicit association test. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 536–555.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., et al. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 216–236.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crocker, J. (2002). The costs of seeking self-esteem. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 597–615.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. De Houwer, J. (2014). A propositional model of implicit evaluation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 342–353.  https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Houwer, J., Heider, N., Spruyt, A., Roets, A., & Hughes, S. (2015). The relational responding task: Toward a new implicit measure of beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 319.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00319.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. De Houwer, J., & Moors, A. (2010). Implicit measures: Similarities and differences. In B. Gawronski & B. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 176–193). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  18. De Houwer, J., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Spruyt, A., & Moors, A. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347–368.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014211.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Deci, E. L., Hodges, R., Pierson, L., & Tomassone, J. (1992). Autonomy and competence as motivational factors in students with learning disabilities and emotional handicaps. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 457–471.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949202500706.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human agency: The basis for true self-esteem. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 31–50). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  21. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunkley, D. M., Blankstein, K. R., Halsall, J., Williams, M., & Winkworth, G. (2000). The relation between perfectionism and distress: Hassles, coping, and perceived social support as mediators and moderators. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 437–453.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.47.4.437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunn, J. G. H., Dunn, J. C., & McDonald, K. (2012). Domain-specific perfectionism in intercollegiate athletes: Relationships with perceived competence and perceived importance in sport and school. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 747–755.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dwyer, L. A., Hornsey, M. J., Smith, L. G. E., Oei, T. P. S., & Dingle, G. A. (2011). Participant autonomy in cognitive behavioral group therapy: An integration of self-determination and cognitive behavioral theories. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30, 24–46.  https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2011.30.1.24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Feather, N. T. (1992). Values, valences, expectations, and actions. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 109–124.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb00887.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fishbach, A., & Dhar, R. (2005). Goals as excuses or guides: The liberating effect of perceived goal progress on choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 370–377.  https://doi.org/10.1086/497548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Franck, E., De Raedt, R., Barbez, C., & Rosseel, Y. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Dutch Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Psychologica Belgica, 48, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Friese, M., Hofmann, W., & Wanke, M. (2008). When impulses take over: Moderated predictive validity of explicit and implicit attitude measures in predicting food choice and consumption behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 397–419.  https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X241540.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Frost, R. O., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate, R. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 449–468.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01172967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gareau, A., & Gaudreau, P. (2017). Working memory moderates the effect of the integrative process of implicit and explicit autonomous motivation on academic achievement. British Journal of Psychology, 108, 701–720.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gawronski, B. (2009). Ten frequently asked questions about implicit measures and their frequently supposed, but not entirely correct answers. Canadian Psychology, 50, 141–150.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gawronski, B., & De Houwer, J. (2014). Implicit measures in social and personality psychology. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd edn., pp. 283–310). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Gemar, M. C., Segal, Z. V., Sagrati, S., & Kennedy, S. J. (2001). Mood-induced changes on the implicit association test in recovered depressed patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 282–289.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843X.110.2.282.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Golijani-Moghaddam, N., Hart, A., & Dawson, D. L. (2013). The implicit relational assessment procedure: Emerging reliability and validity data. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2, 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gore, P. A. (2000). Cluster analysis. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 297–321). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022–1038.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1022.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Heppner, W. L., Kernis, M. H., Nezlek, J. B., Foster, J., Lakey, C. E., & Goldman, B. M. (2008). Within-person relationships among daily self-esteem, need satisfaction, and authenticity. Psychological Science, 19, 1140–1145.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02215.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hibbard, S. (2003). A critique of Lilienfeld et al.’s (2000) “The scientific status of projective techniques”. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 260–271.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8003_05.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Hoffmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwender, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369–1385.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205275613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hughes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., & De Houwer, J. (2011). The dominance of associative theorizing in implicit attitude research: Propositional and behavioral alternatives. Psychological Record, 61, 465–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hussey, I., Thompson, M., McEnteggart, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2015). Interpreting and inverting with less cursing: A guide to interpreting IRAP data. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4, 157–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2015.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Keatley, D., Clarke, D. D., & Hagger, M. S. (2012). Investigating the predictive validity of implicit and explicit measures of motivation in problem-solving behavioural tasks. British Journal of Social Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02107.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., & Garb, H. N. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 27–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Murray, H. A. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Ng, J. Y. Y., Lonsdale, C., & Hodge, K. (2011). The Basic Needs Satisfaction in Sport Scale (BNSSS): Instrument development and initial validity evidence. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12, 257–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.10.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nosek, B. A., Hawkins, C. B., & Frazier, R. S. (2011). Implicit social cognition: From measures to mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 152–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Paradise, A. W., & Kernis, M. H. (1999). Development of the Contingent Self-Esteem Scale. Unpublished scale, University of Georgia.Google Scholar
  51. Radel, R., Pelletier, L. G., Sarrazin, P., & Milyavskaya, M. (2011). Restoration process of the need for autonomy: The early alarm stage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 919–934.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025196.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Remue, J., De Houwer, J., Barnes-Holmes, D., Vanderhasselt, M., & De Raedt, R. (2013). Self-esteem revisited: Performance on the implicit relational assessment procedure as a measure of self- versus ideal self-related cognitions in dysphoria. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 1441–1449.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Rice, K. G., Ashby, J. S., & Gilman, R. (2011). Classifying adolescent perfectionists. Psychological Assessment, 23, 563–577.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022482.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Rice, K. G., Ray, M. E., Davis, D. E., DeBlaere, C., & Ashby, J. S. (2015). Perfectionism and longitudinal patterns of stress for STEM majors: Implications for academic performance. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62, 718–731.  https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000097.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Rice, K. G., & Richardson, C. M. E. (2014). Classification challenges in perfectionism. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61, 641–648.  https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000040.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  57. Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ryan, R. M., Bernstein, J. H., & Brown, K. W. (2010). Weekends, work, and well-being: Psychological need satisfactions and day of the week effects on mood, vitality, and physical symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 95–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  60. Ryan, R. M., Koestner, R., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Ego-involved persistence: When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated. Motivation and Emotion, 15, 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schüler, J., Sheldon, K. M., & Fröhlich, S. M. (2010). Implicit need for achievement moderates the relationship between competence need satisfaction and subsequent motivation. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schüler, J., Sheldon, K. M., Prentice, M., & Halusic, M. (2016). Do some people need autonomy more than others? Implicit dispositions toward autonomy moderate the effects of felt autonomy on well-being. Journal of Personality, 84, 5–20.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Schultheiss, O. C., & Brunstein, J. C. (2005). An implicit motive approach to competence. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 31–51). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  64. Sheldon, K. M., & Gunz, A. (2009). Psychological needs as basic motives, not just experiential requirements. Journal of Personality, 77, 1467–1492.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00589.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Slabbinck, H., De Houwer, J., & Van Kenhove, P. (2011). A pictorial attitude IAT as a measure of implicit motives. European Journal of Personality, 25, 76–86.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Soenens, B., & Duriez, B. (2012). Does conservatism have a self-esteem enhancing function? An examination of associations with contingent self-worth and ill-being in late adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 728–732.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Luyten, P., Duriez, B., & Goossens, L. (2005). Maladaptive perfectionistic self-representations: The mediational link between psychological control and adjustment. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 487–498.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Spruyt, A., Clarysse, J., Vansteenwegen, D., Baeyens, F., & Hermans, D. (2010). Affect 4.0: A free software package for implementing psychological and psychophysiological experiments. Experimental Psychology, 57, 36–45.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Stoeber, J., Chesterman, D., & Tarn, T. A. (2010). Perfectionism and task performance: Time on task mediates the perfectionistic strivings-performance relationship. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 458–462.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tafarodi, R. W., & Swann, W. B. (1995). Self-liking and self-competence as dimensions of global self-esteem: Initial validation of a measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 322–342.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6502_8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Thrash, T. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Implicit and self-attributed achievement motives: Concordance and predictive validity. Journal of Personality, 70, 729–756.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Thrash, T. M., Maruskin, L. A., & Martin, C. C. (2012). Implicit-explicit motive congruence. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 141–156). New York: Oxford university press.Google Scholar
  73. Vahey, N. A., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Stewart, I. (2009). A first test of the implicit relational assessment procedure as a measure of self-esteem: Irish prisoner groups and university students. Psychological Record, 59, 371–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Van Assche, J., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., Audenaert, E., De Schryver, M., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2018). Are the benefits of autonomy satisfaction and the costs of autonomy frustration dependent on individuals’ autonomy strength? Journal of Personality.Google Scholar
  75. Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work-related Basic Need Satisfaction scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 981–1002.  https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X481382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., Wouters, S., Verschueren, K., Briers, V., Deeren, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2016). The pursuit of self-esteem and its motivational implications. Psychologica Belgica, 56, 143–168.  https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Verstuyf, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., Boone, L., & Mouratidis, A. (2013). Daily ups and downs in women’s binge eating symptoms: The role of basic psychological needs, general self-control and emotional eating. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 32, 335–361.  https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2013.32.3.335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wang, C. K., Liu, W. C., Lochbaum, M. R., & Stevenson, S. J. (2009). Sport ability beliefs, 2 × 2 achievement goals, and autonomy: The moderating role of perceived competence in the exercise domain. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80, 303–312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040934.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Developmental, Social, and Personality Psychology, Faculty of PsychologyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Experimental Clinical and Health PsychologyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations