Parent and teacher effects on academic coping and classroom engagement: Testing a motivational model

  • Jacquelyn N. Raftery-Helmer
  • Wendy S. Grolnick
Original Paper
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

Little is known about the contextual antecedents and consequences of children’s academic coping. One hundred and eighty-three-sixth grade students participated in a study that examined a process model whereby children’s perceptions of parent and teacher behaviors were associated with children’s coping strategies through children’s appraisals of failure. It also examined whether these coping strategies were then associated with students’ classroom engagement. Results revealed that parent autonomy support was indirectly associated with defensive coping through its effects on children’s appraisals of failure. There was also some support that cognitive appraisals, particularly threat appraisals were indirectly associated with child reported engagement through coping, suggesting that coping appraisals impact children’s engagement and participation in the classroom through their effects on coping behavior/strategy use. The findings underscore the importance of parent autonomy support for children’s appraisals of failure, coping, and engagement.

Keywords

Engagement Coping Motivation Parenting Teachers 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arbuckle, J. L. (2010). IBM SPSS Amos 19User’s Guide. Spring House, PA: Amos Development Corporation.Google Scholar
  2. Assor, A., & Tal, K. (2012). When parents’ affection depends on child’s achievement: Parental conditional positive regard, self-aggrandizement, shame and coping in adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 249–260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber, B. (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67, 3296–3319.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrington, B. L., & Hendricks, B. (1989). Differentiating characteristics of high school graduates, dropouts, and nongraduates. The Journal of Educational Research, 82, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (Eds.) (2012). Introduction to structural equation modeling. Personal collection of Curran-Bauer Analytics, LLC, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  7. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 11, 56–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Belmont, M., Skinner, E., Wellborn, J., & Connell, J., Teacher as social context (TASC). (1992). Two measures of teacher provision of involvement, structure, and autonomy support. Technical Report, Portland State University, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  10. Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., & Neckerman, H. J. (1989). Early school dropout: Configurations and determinants. Child Development, 60, 1437–1452.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Compas, B. E., Champion, J. E., & Reeslund, K. (2005). Coping with stress: Implications for preventative interventions with adolescents. Prevention Researcher, 12, 17–20.Google Scholar
  12. Connell, J. P. (1985). A new multidimensional measure of children’s perceptions of control. Child Development, 56, 1018–1041.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Connell, J. P., Halpern-Felsher, B. L., Clifford, E., Crichlow, W., & Usinger, P. (1995). Hanging in there: Behavioral, psychological, and contextual factors affecting whether African-American adolescents stay in high school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 10, 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B., & Aber, J. L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in African-American youth: Context, self, action, and outcomes in school. Children and Poverty, 65, 493–506.Google Scholar
  15. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doron, J., Stephan, Y., Maiano, C., & Le Scanff, C. (2011). Motivational predictors of coping with academic examination. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 87–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dweck, C. S. (1990). Self-theories and goals: Their role in motivational, personality, and development. In R. A. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1990: Perspectives on motivation (pp. 199–235). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  19. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Guthrie, I. K. (1997). Coping with stress. In S. A. Wolcik & I. N. Sandler (Eds.), Handbood of children’s coping: Linking theory and intervention (pp. 41–70). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ekstrom, R. B., Goertz, M. E., Pollack, J. M., & Rock, D. A. (1986). Who drops out of high school and why? Findings from a national study. Teacher College Record, 87, 356–373.Google Scholar
  21. Eschenbeck, H., Kohlmann, C., & Lohaus, A. (2007). Gender differences in coping strategies in children and adolescents. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 18–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Farkas, M. S., & Grolnick, W. S. (2010). Examining the components and concomitants of structure in the academic domain. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 266–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Farkas, M. S., & Grolnick, W. S. (2010). Examining the components and concomitants of parental structure in the academic domain. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 266–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Report for National Center for Educational Statistics.Google Scholar
  26. Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 992–1003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationship to motivation and achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grissom, J. B., & Shepard, L. A. (1989). Repeating and dropping out of school. In L. A. Shepard & M. L. Smith (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention. (pp. 16–33). London Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  30. Grolnick, W., & Wellborn, J. (1988). Parent influences on childrens school-related self-system processes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  31. Grolnick, W. S., Raftery-Helmer, J. N., Marbell, K., Flamm, E. S., Cardemil, E. V., & Sanchez, M. (2014). Parental provision of structure: Implementation and correlates in three domains. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 60, 355–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Parent styles associated with children’s self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grolnick, W. S., & Slowiaczek, M. L. (1994). Parents’ involvement in children’s schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development, 65, 237–252.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72, 625–638.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence sale for children. Child Development, 53, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hawkins, D. J., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hodapp, V., & Benson, J. (1997). The multidimensionality of test anxiety: A test of different models. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 10, 219–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal tests of self-determination theory’s motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1175–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 588–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Janosz, M., LeBlanc, M., Boulerice, B., & Tremblay, R. E. (1997). Disentangling the weight of school dropout predictors: A test on two longitudinal samples. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26(6), 733–762.Google Scholar
  41. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  42. Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74, 262–273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Knee, C. R., & Zuckerman, M. (1998). A nondefensive personality: Autonomy and control as moderators of defensive coping and self-handicapping. Journal of Research in Personaltiy, 32, 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Lengua, L. J., & Long, A. C. (2002). The role of emotionality and self-regulation in the appraisal-coping process. Tests of direct and moderating effect. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23, 471–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maier, K. J., Waldstein, S. R., & Synowski, S. J. (2003). Relation of cognitive appraisal to cardiovascular reactivity, affect, and task engagement. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 26, 32–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 23–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2009). Data analysis using SAS enterprise guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Natriello, G. (1984). Problems in the evaluation of students and student disengagement from secondary schools. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 17, 14–24.Google Scholar
  51. Newmann, F., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11–39). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  52. Ntoumanis, N., Edmunds, J., & Duda, J. L. (2009). Understanding the coping process from a self-determination theory perspective. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 249–260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Pomerantz, E. M., & Eaton, M. M. (2000). Developmental differences in children’s conceptions of parental control: ‘They love me, but they make me feel incompetent. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 46, 140–167.Google Scholar
  54. Ptacek, J. T., Smith, R. E., & Dodge, K. L. (1994). Gender differences in coping with stress: When stressor and appraisals do not differ. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Quested, E., Bosch, J. A., Burns, V. E., Cumming, J., Ntoumanis, N., & Duda, J. L. (2011). Basic psychological need satisfaction, stress-related appraisals, and dancers’ cortisol and anxiety responses. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 33, 828–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Raftery-Helmer, J. N., & Grolnick, W. G. (2016). Children’s coping with academic failure: Relations with contextual and motivational resources supporting competence. The Journal of Early Adolescence 36(8), 1017–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reschly, A. L., Huebner, E. S., Appleton, J. J., & Antaramian, S. (2008). Engagement as flourishing: The contribution of positive emotions and coping to adolescents’ engagement at school and with learning. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 419–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rhodewalt, F., & Vohs, D. (2005). Defensive strategies, motivation, and the self: A self-regulatory process view. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 548–565). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  59. Rohner, R. P. (1986). The warmth dimensions: Foundations of parental acceptance theory. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Rumberger, R. W. (1995). Dropping out of middle school: A multilevel analysis of students and schools. American Education Research Journal, 32, 583–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., & Grolnick, W. S. (1992). When achievement is not intrinsically motivated. A theory of internalization and self-regulation in school. In A. K. Boggiano & T. S. Pittman (Eds.), Achievement and motivation: A social-developmental perspective (pp. 167–188). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (1990). Test anxiety. In H. Leitenberg (Ed.), Handbook of social and evaluation anxiety (pp. 475–495). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schaefer, E. S. (1965). Children’s reports of parental behavior: An inventory. Child Development, 36, 413–424.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Sheets, V., Sandler, I., & West, S. G. (1996). Appraisals of negative events by preadolescent children of divorce. Child Development, 67, 2166–2182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Sinclair, M. F., Christenson, S. L., Lehr, C. A., & Anderson, A. R. (2003). Facilitating student engagement: Lessons learned from check & connect longitudinal studies. California School Psychologist, 8, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Skinner, E., Johnson, S., & Snyder, T. (2005). Six dimensions of parenting: A motivational model. Parenting: Science and Practice, 5, 175–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Skinner, E. A. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 549–570.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Skinner, E. A., & Edge, K. (2002). Self-determination, coping, and development. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Self-determination theory: Extensions and applications (pp. 297–337). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  70. Skinner, E. A., Edge, K., Altman, J., & Sherwood, H. (2003). Searching for the structure of coping: A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 216–269.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009). Engagement as an organizational construct in the dynamics of motivational development. In K. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 223–245). Malwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  72. Skinner, E. A., Pitzer, J. R., & Steele, J. (2013). Coping as part of motivational resilience in school: A multi-dimensional measure of families, allocations, and profiles of academic coping. Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 803–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Skinner, E. A., Pitzer, J. R., & Steele, J. (2016). Can student engagement serve as a motivational resource for academic coping, persistence, and learning during late elementary and early middle school? Developmental Psychology, 52, 2099–2117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Skinner, E. A., & Wellborn, J. G. (1994). Coping during childhood and adolescence: A motivational perspective. In D. Featherman, R. Lerner & M. Perlmutter (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 91–133). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  75. Skinner, E. A., & Wellborn, J. G. (1997). Children’s coping in the academic domain. In S. A. Wolchik & I. N. Sandler (Eds.), Handbook of children’s coping: Linking theory and intervention (pp. 387–422). New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Skinner, E. A., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Connell, J. P. (1998). Individual differences and the development of perceived control. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63, v-220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., & Sprague, J. R. (1999). Functional-assessment-based behavior support planning: Research to practice to research. Behavioral Disorders, 24(3), 253–257.Google Scholar
  78. Swanson, J., Valiente, C., Lemery-Chalfant, K., & O’Brien, T. C. (2011). Predicting early adolescents’ academic achievement, social competence, and physical health from parenting, ego resilience, and engagement coping. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31, 548–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Thompson, S. F., Zalewski, M., & Lengua, L. J. (2014). Appraisal and coping styles account for the effects of temperament on pre-adolescent adjustment. Australian Journal of Psychology, 66, 122–129.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Wehlage, G. G., & Rutter, R. A. (1986). Dropping out: How much do schools contribute to the problem? Teachers College Record, 87, 374–392.Google Scholar
  81. Wehlage, G. G., Rutter, R. A., Smith, G. A., Lesko, N. L., & Fernandez, R. R. (1989). Reducing the risk: Schools as communities of support. Philadelphia: Farmer Press.Google Scholar
  82. Weisz, J. R. (1986). Contingency and control beliefs as predictors of psychotherapy outcomes among children and adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 789–795.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Engaged and disaffected action: The conceptualization and measurement of motivation in the academic domain. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester, New York.Google Scholar
  84. Zalewski, M., Lengua, L. J., Wilson, A. C., Trancik, A., & Bazinet, A. (2011). Associations of coping and appraisal styles with emotion regulation during preadolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 141–158.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Locke, E. M. (2007). The socialization of adolescent coping behaviors. Relationships with families and teachers. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 1–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Worcester State UniversityWorcesterUSA
  2. 2.Clark UniversityWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations