It’s a matter of time (perspectives): shifting valence responses to emotional ambiguity
- 522 Downloads
Our stage in life has profound influences on our emotions. A well-established age-related positivity effect is putatively related to time perspectives—older adults have a limited time perspective and a greater motivation to experience positivity than young adults. Ambiguous emotions (e.g., surprised expressions) have both a positive and negative meaning, offering a highly relevant model for examining this developmental trend. Indeed, there are stable, trait-like individual differences in valence bias, or the tendency to interpret surprise as positive or negative, with a developmental trend toward positivity (older adults are more positive than young adults, who are more positive than children). However, little research has determined the extent to which the bias can be shifted. In three experiments, we found that ambiguity ratings were sensitive to time perspectives, even within a population of college students, and that this effect is relatively long-lasting. Results extend socioemotional selectivity theory and demonstrate that our life stage may have profound effects on otherwise stable emotional responses.
KeywordsEmotional ambiguity Individual differences Time perspective Valence bias Aging
We thank Krupa Patel, Hang Nguyen, Kaitlyn Winter, and Aaron Hoagland for help with data collection.
- Carstensen, L. L. (1993). Motivation for social contact across the life span: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 40, 209–254.Google Scholar
- Cypryańska, M., Krejtz, I., JaskółOwska, A., Kulawik, A., Żukowska, A., De Zavala, A. G., … Nezlek, J. B. (2014). An experimental study of the influence of limited time horizon on positivity effects among young adults using eye-tracking. Psychological Reports, 115(3), 813–827. https://doi.org/10.2466/02.PR0.115c28z8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kellough, J. L., & Knight, B. G. (2012). Positivity effects in older adults’ perception of facial emotion: The role of future time perspective. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67(2), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kennedy, Q., Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2004). The role of motivation in the age-related positivity effect in autobiographical memory. Psychological Science, 15(3), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.01503011.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim, H., Somerville, L. H., Johnstone, T., Alexander, A. L., & Whalen, P. J. (2003). Inverse amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex responses to surprised faces. Neuroreport, 14(18), 2317–2322. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000101520.44335.20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical report A-8.Google Scholar
- Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Öhman, A. (1998). The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces-KDEF. CD-ROM from Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology section, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm. ISBN 91-630-7164-9.Google Scholar
- Tottenham, N., Phuong, J., Flannery, J., Gabard-Durnam, L., & Goff, B. (2013). A negativity bias for ambiguous facial-expression valence during childhood: Converging evidence from behavior and facial corrugator muscle responses. Emotion, 13(1), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029431.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tottenham, N., Tanaka, J. W., Leon, A. C., McCarry, T., Nurse, M., Hare, T. A., & Nelson, C. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168(3), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Williams, L. M., Kemp, A. H., Felmingham, K., Liddell, B. J., Palmer, D. M., & Bryant, R. A. (2007). Neural biases to covert and overt signals of fear: Dissociation by trait anxiety and depression. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(10), 1595–1608. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.10.1595.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar