Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 321–333 | Cite as

Thoughts about a successful future encourage action in the face of challenge

  • Mesmin Destin
  • Vida M. Manzo
  • Sarah S. M. Townsend
Original Paper

Abstract

College environments can put lower socioeconomic status (SES) female students at particular risk of withdrawing during challenging academic situations. However, thinking about reaching a successful future identity may encourage these students to take action rather than withdraw. In a laboratory experiment, we tested the hypothesis that imagining a successful future identity would help lower SES female students to actively and successfully confront challenging tasks (i.e., a mock student–faculty interaction and difficult academic test). As predicted, when future identities were cued rather than past identities, lower SES female students demonstrated greater action readiness. Specifically, they showed more expansive body posture during the mock interaction and more attempts to complete the academic test, which led to better performance. The motivation to take action among higher SES and male students, who are at lower risk of vulnerability in college environments, was not influenced by future identities.

Keywords

Future identity Action readiness Socioeconomic status Student–faculty interactions 

Supplementary material

11031_2017_9664_MOESM1_ESM.docx (39 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 38 KB)

References

  1. Aisch, G., Buchanan, L., Cox, A., & Quealy, K. (2017). Economic diversity and student outcomes at Northwestern University. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/college-mobility/northwestern-university.
  2. Anaya, G., & Cole, D. G. (2001). Latina/o student achievement: Exploring the influence of student–faculty interactions on college grades. Journal of College Student Development, 42(1), 3–14.Google Scholar
  3. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Aspinwall, L. G., & Taylor, S. E. (1992). Modeling cognitive adaptation: A longitudinal investigation of the impact of individual differences and coping on college adjustment and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 989–1003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bildt, C., & Michélsen, H. (2002). Gender differences in the effects from working conditions on mental health: A 4-year follow-up. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 75(4), 252–258.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bozick, R. (2007). Making it through the first year of college: The role of students’ economic resources, employment, and living arrangements. Sociology of Education, 80(3), 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Browman, A. S., & Destin, M. (2016). The effects of a warm or chilly climate towards socioeconomic diversity on academic motivation and self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 172–187.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapell, M. S., Blanding, Z. B., Silverstein, M. E., Takahashi, M., Newman, B., Gubi, A., & McCann, N. (2005). Test anxiety and academic performance in undergraduate and graduate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chemers, M. M., Hu, L., & Garcia, B. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cox, B. E., McIntosh, K. L., Terenzini, P. T., Reason, R. D., & Quaye, B. R. L. (2010). Pedagogical signals of faculty approachability: Factors shaping faculty–student interaction outside the classroom. Research in Higher Education, 51(8), 767–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Croizet, J.-C., & Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(6), 588–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cuddy, A. J. C., Wilmuth, C. A., Yap, A. J., & Carney, D. R. (2015). Preparatory power posing affects nonverbal presence and job interview performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1286–1295.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dael, N., Mortillaro, M., & Scherer, K. R. (2012). Emotion expression in body action and posture. Emotion, 12(5), 1085–1101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Eagan, K., Stolzenberg, E. B., Bates, A. K., Aragon, M. C., Suchard, M. R., & Rios-Aguilar, C. (2016). The American freshman: National norms fall 2015. Los Angeles: Cooperative Institution Research Program at the Higher Education Research Institute at UCLA. Retrieved from http://www.heri.ucla.edu/monographs/TheAmericanFreshman2015-Expanded.pdf.
  16. Elliott, M. (2001). Gender differences in causes of depression. Women & Health, 33(3–4), 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ersner-Hershfield, H., Garton, M. T., Ballard, K., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., & Knutson, B. (2009). Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow: Individual differences in future self-continuity account for saving. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(4), 280–286.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Frijda, N. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43(5), 349–358.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hall, J. A., Coats, E. J., & LeBeau, L. S. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 898–924.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hancock, D. R. (2001). Effects of test anxiety and evaluative threat on students’ achievement and motivation. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(5), 284–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hannon, B. (2012). Test anxiety and performance-avoidance goals explain gender differences in SAT-V, SAT-M, and overall SAT scores. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(7), 816–820.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Giffen, C. J., Blair, S. S., Rouse, D. I., & Hyde, J. S. (2014). Closing the social class achievement gap for first-generation students in undergraduate biology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 375–389.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Higgins, E. T., Tykocinski, O., & Vookles, J. (1990). Patterns of self-beliefs: The Psychological significance of relations among actual, ideal, ought, can, and future selves. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Self-inference processes: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 6, pp. 153–190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Hoyle, R. H., & Sherrill, M. R. (2006). Future orientation in the self-system: Possible selves, self-regulation, and behavior. Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1673–1696.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang, L., Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Guillory, L. E. (2011). Powerful postures versus powerful roles: Which is the proximate correlate of thought and behavior? Psychological Science, 22(1), 95–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hurtado, S., Eagan, M. K., Tran, M. C., Newman, C. B., Chang, M. J., & Velasco, P. (2011). “We do science here”: Underrepresented students’ interactions with faculty in different college contexts. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 553–579.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson, S. E., Richeson, J. A., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). Middle class and marginal? Socioeconomic status, stigma, and self-regulation at an elite university. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 838–852.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kao, G., & Thompson, J. S. (2003). Racial and ethnic stratification in educational achievement and attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1) 417–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim, Y. K., & Sax, L. J. (2009). Student–faculty interaction in research universities: Differences by student gender, race, social class, and first-generation status. Research in Higher Education, 50(5), 437–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim, Y. K., & Sax, L. J. (2011). Are the effects of student–faculty interaction dependent on academic major? An examination using multilevel modeling. Research in Higher Education, 52(6), 589–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. King, L. A. (2001). The health benefits of writing about life goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(7), 798–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K.-M., & Hellhammer, K. H. (1993). The “Trier Social Stress Test”: A tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology, 28, 76–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S. (2001). The effects of student–faculty interaction in the 1990s. The Review of Higher Education, 24(3), 309–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lamport, M. A. (1993). Student–faculty informal interaction and the effect on college student outcomes: A review of the literature. Adolescence, 28(112), 971–990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Landau, M. J., Oyserman, D., Keefer, L. A., & Smith, G. C. (2014). The college journey and academic engagement: How metaphor use enhances identity-based motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(5), 679–698.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lapsley, D. K., Rice, K. G., & Shadid, G. E. (1989). Psychological separation and adjustment to college. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(3), 286–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Markus, H. R., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Markus, H. R., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38(1), 299–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McAdams, D. P., & McLean, K. C. (2013). Narrative identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 233–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2001). Gender differences in depression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(5), 173–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nussbaum, A. D., & Steele, C. M. (2007). Situational disengagement and persistence in the face of adversity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(1), 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oettingen, G., Mayer, D., Timur Sevincer, A., Stephens, E. J., Pak, H., & Hagenah, M. (2009). Mental contrasting and goal commitment: The mediating role of energization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(5), 608–622.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Oettingen, G., Pak, H., & Schnetter, K. (2001). Self-regulation of goal-setting: Turning free fantasies about the future into binding goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 736–753.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Olstad, R., Sexton, H., & Søgaard, A. J. (2001). The Finnmark Study. A prospective population study of the social support buffer hypothesis, specific stressors and mental distress. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 36(12), 582–589.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Ostrove, J. M., & Long, S. M. (2007). Social class and belonging: Implications for college adjustment. Review of Higher Education, 30(4), 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ouellette, J. A., Hessling, R., Gibbons, F. X., Reis-Bergan, M., & Gerrard, M. (2005). Using images to increase exercise behavior: Prototypes versus possible selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(5), 610–620.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Oyserman, D. (2015). Pathways to success through identity-based motivation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Oyserman, D., Bybee, D., & Terry, K. (2006). Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves impel action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 188–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Oyserman, D., & Destin, M. (2010). Identity-based motivation: Implications for intervention. The Counseling Psychologist, 38(7), 1001–1043.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Oyserman, D., Destin, M., & Novin, S. (2015). The context-sensitive future self: Possible selves motivate in context, not otherwise. Self and Identity, 14(2), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1977). Patterns of student–faculty informal interaction beyond the classroom and voluntary freshman attrition. Journal of Higher Education, 48(5), 540–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Ptacek, J. T., Smith, R. E., & Dodge, K. L. (1994). Gender differences in coping with stress: When stressor and appraisals do not differ. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(4), 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Mendoza-Denton, R. (2014). Social class and academic achievement in college: The interplay of rejection sensitivity and entity beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(1), 101–121.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Riskind, J. H. (1984). They stoop to conquer: Guiding and self-regulatory functions of physical posture after success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(3), 479–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ruvolo, A. P., & Markus, H. R. (1992). Possible selves and performance: The power of self-relevant imagery. Social Cognition, 10(1), 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sax, L. J., Bryant, A. N., & Harper, C. E. (2005). The differential effects of student–faculty interaction on college outcomes for women and men. Journal of College Student Development, 46(6), 642–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schraedley, P. K., Gotlib, I. H., & Hayward, C. (1999). Gender differences in correlates of depressive symptoms in adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 25(2), 98–108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Slotter, E. B., Duffy, C. W., & Gardner, W. L. (2014). Balancing the need to be “me” with the need to be “we”: Applying optimal distinctiveness theory to the understanding of multiple motives within romantic relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith, G. C., James, L. E., Varnum, M. E. W., & Oyserman, D. (2014). Give up or get going? Productive uncertainty in uncertain times. Self and Identity, 13(6), 681–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Stephens, N. M., Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R., Johnson, C. S., & Covarrubias, R. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178–1197.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Stephens, N. M., Hamedani, M., & Destin, M. (2014). Navigating the social class divide: A diversity education intervention improves first-generation students’ academic performance and all students’ college transition. Psychological Science, 25(4), 943–953.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Stephens, N. M., Townsend, S. S., Hamedani, M. G., Destin, M., & Manzo, V. (2015). A Difference–education intervention equips first-generation college students to thrive in the face of stressful college situations. Psychological Science, 26(10), 1556–1566.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Suri, G., Sheppes, G., & Gross, J. J. (2015). The role of action readiness in motivated behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(6), 1105–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wallbott, H. G. (1998). Bodily expression of emotion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(6), 879–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Walpole, M. (2003). Socioeconomic status and college: How SES affects college experiences and outcomes. The Review of Higher Education, 27(1), 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wilkins, A. (2016). “Whatever it takes”? Gender and social integration for white first-generation college students. Presented at the Human Development and Social Policy Program Colloquium Series, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  71. Wilson, R. C., Woods, L., & Gaff, J. G. (1974). Social-psychological accessibility and faculty–student interaction beyond the classroom. Sociology of Education, 47(1), 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wright, R. A. (2008). Refining the prediction of effort: Brehm’s distinction between potential motivation and motivation intensity. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 682–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mesmin Destin
    • 1
  • Vida M. Manzo
    • 1
  • Sarah S. M. Townsend
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  2. 2.Marshall School of BusinessUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations