Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 79–89 | Cite as

The unconscious side of Facebook: Do online social network profiles leak cues to users’ implicit motive dispositions?

  • Michael Dufner
  • Ruben C. Arslan
  • Jaap J. A. Denissen
Original Paper

Abstract

In this study we investigated the links between motive dispositions and online social network (OSN) profile content. We assessed the achievement, affiliation and power motives via self- and peer-report. In addition, we used a projective test and two novel, affect based measures (involving affect ratings and EMG recordings) to assess implicit motives in the three content domains. Two observers independently coded motive-specific OSN content. Results showed that self-reports were linked to OSN content for the power domain. Peer-reports and measures of implicit motives were positively linked to OSN content across motive domains. In most cases, measures of implicit motives were still linked to OSN content after adjusting for self- and peer-reports. These results indicate that OSN profiles may leak cues to users’ implicit motives, which neither users themselves nor their peers are aware of. Implications for motive theory, motive assessment, and targeted online advertising will be discussed.

Keywords

Motive dispositions Implicit motives Online social networks Social media EMG 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Grant DE 1662/2-1 from the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) allocated to Jaap J. A. Denissen. We thank Birk Hagemeyer for helpful comments of an earlier version of this manuscript.

References

  1. Atkinson, J. W., Bongort, K., & Price, L. H. (1977). Explorations using computer simulation to comprehend thematic apperceptive measurement of motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 1, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banse, R., Imhoff, R., Steffens, M., Schramm, N., Rösch, A., Roberts, M., & Stangier, U. (2013). Partner-AMP and well-being: Evidence for an implicit secure base script? Personal Relationships, 20, 140–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergman, S. M., Fearrington, M. E., Davenport, S. W., & Bergman, J. Z. (2011). Millennials, narcissism, and social networking: What narcissists do on social networking sites and why. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 706–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosson, J. K., Swann, W. B., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 631–643.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brunstein, J. C. (2008). Implicit and explicit motives. In J. Heckhausen & H. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation and action (3rd ed., pp. 227–246). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brunstein, J. C., Schultheiss, O. C., & Grässman, R. (1998). Personal goals and emotional well-being: The moderating role of motive dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 494–508.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Losch, M. E., & Kim, H. S. (1986). Electromyographic activity over facial muscle regions can differentiate the valence and intensity of affective reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 260–268.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Carreon, B. (2011). How to say you’re the boss with your clothes [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/bluecarreon/2011/07/19/how-to-say-youre-the-boss-with-your-clothes/#26433ee12e3e.
  9. De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 853–869.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dufner, M., Arslan, R. C., Hagemeyer, B., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2015). Affective contingencies in the affiliative domain: Physiological assessment, associations with the affiliation motive, and prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 662–676.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Facebook (2015). Retrieved from http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/.
  12. Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fridlund, A. J. (1994). Human facial expression. San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  14. Fridlund, A. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Guidelines for human electromyographic research. Psychophysiology, 23, 567–589.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Graham, L. T., Sandy, C. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Manifestations of individual differences in physical and virtual environments. In T. Chamorro-Premuzic, von Stumm S., & A. Furnham (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences (pp. 773–800). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Hagemeyer, B., Dufner, M., & Denissen, J. J. (2016). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit affiliative motives: A closer look at socializing behavior in dyadic interactions. Journal of Research in Personality, 65, 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heckhausen, H. (1963). Hoffnung und Furcht in der Leistungsmotivation [Hope and fear in achievement motivation]. Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain.Google Scholar
  18. Heser, K., Banse, R., & Imhoff, R. (2015). Affiliation or power: What motivates behavior on social networking sites? Swiss Journal of Psychology, 74, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jackson, D. N. (1967). Manual for the Personality Research Form. Goshen, IN: Research Psychologist Press.Google Scholar
  20. Köllner, M. G., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2014). Meta-analytic evidence of low convergence between implicit and explicit measures of the needs for achievement, affiliation, and power. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 826.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., & Graepel, T. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 5802–5805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krause, S., Back, M. D., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2016). Predicting self-confident behavior with implicit and explicit self-esteem measures. European Journal of Personality, 30, 648–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krause, S., & Dufner, M. (2017). Predicting romantic relationship behaviors with explicit and implicit partner evaluations: An actor-partner interdependence analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  24. Larsen, J. T., Norris, C. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2003). Effects of positive and negative affect on electromyographic activity over zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii. Psychophysiology, 40, 776–785.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. McAdams, D. P., Jackson, R. J., & Kirshnit, C. (1984). Looking laughing and smiling in dyads as a function of intimacy motivation. Journal of Personality, 52, 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pang, J. S., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2005). Assessing implicit motives in US college students: Effects of picture type and position, gender and ethnicity, and cross-cultural comparisons. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 280–294.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rudolph, A., Schröder-Abé, M., Schütz, A., Gregg, A. P., & Sedikides, C. (2008). Through a glass, less darkly? Reassessing convergent and discriminant validity in measures of implicit self-esteem. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schönbrodt, F. D., & Gerstenberg, F. X. (2012). An IRT analysis of motive questionnaires: The unified motive scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 6, 725–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schultheiss, O. C. (2001). An information processing account of implicit motive arousal. In M. L. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 12, pp. 1–41). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  33. Schultheiss, O. C. (2008). Implicit motives. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 603–633). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  34. Schultheiss, O. C., & Pang, J. S. (2007). Measuring implicit motives. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 323–344). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  35. Scinta, A., & Gable, S. L. (2007). Automatic and self-reported attitudes in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1008–1022CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sedikides, C., Hoorens, V., & Dufner, M. (2015). Self-enhancing self-presentation: Interpersonal, relational, and organizational implications. In F. Guay, D. M. McInerney, R. Craven & H. W. Marsh (Eds.), Selfconcept, motivation and identity: Underpinning success with research and practice. International advances in self research (Vol. 5, pp. 29–55). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  37. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Stumpf, H., Angleitner, A., Wieck, T., Jackson, D. N., & Beloch-Till, H. (1985). Deutsche Personality Research Form (PRF): Handanweisung [German personality research form: Manual]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  39. Tassinary, L. G., Hess, U., & Carcoba, L. M. (2012). Peripheral physiological measures of psychological constructs. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 1: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics (pp. 461–488). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vazire, S., & Carlson, E. N. (2011). Others sometimes know us better than we know ourselves. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 104–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Winter, D. G. (1994). Manual for scoring motive imagery in running text (4th ed.). Ann Arbor: Department of Psychology, University of Michigan (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  43. Youyou, W., Kosinski, M., & Stillwell, D. (2015). Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 1036–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Dufner
    • 1
  • Ruben C. Arslan
    • 2
  • Jaap J. A. Denissen
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Center for Adaptive RationalityMax Planck Institute for Human DevelopmentBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Tilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations