Basic psychological needs and work motivation: A longitudinal test of directionality
- 1.7k Downloads
Most work-related studies of self-determination theory (SDT) have focused either on satisfaction of basic psychological needs or on types of work motivation when studying motivational processes at work. The few studies that have considered both mechanisms have usually assumed that satisfaction or frustration of basic psychological needs is a prerequisite of different types of work motivation. Nevertheless, the directionality of this relation has not been explicitly tested in previous studies of the workplace. The current study explored the relations among managerial need support, basic psychological need satisfaction at work, and work motivation. It tested competing sets of hypotheses regarding the directionality of these three core constructs within SDT’s model of work motivation. A longitudinal analysis suggested that managerial need support was positively directly related to basic psychological need satisfaction but not directly related to work motivation. Further, results indicated that basic psychological need satisfaction was related to work motivation over time and not the other way around. In addition, it was found an indirect relation between in managerial need support and in work motivation through in basic psychological need satisfaction. These findings have important implications for future SDT research testing process models in the workplace.
KeywordsSelf-determination theory Managerial need support Basic psychological need satisfaction Work motivation Longitudinal
This research is a part of a project supported by a grant from Buskerud University College Research Program in Management.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there are no conflict of interest.
The data collection was approved by the Norwegian Social Science Data Services and participation was voluntary. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
- deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes (Vol. 13). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 237–288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- Enders, C. K. (2006). Analyzing structural equation models with missing data. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 313–342). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., Van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A., … Westbye, C. (2015). The multidimensional work motivation scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling techniques and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 7.Google Scholar
- Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Olafsen, A. H. (2016). Work motivation throught the lens of self-determination theory. (PhD), Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
- Olafsen, A. H., & Halvari, H. (2017). Motivational mechanisms in the relation between job characteristics and employee functioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2017.34.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester: The University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Autonomy and basic psychological needs in human motivation, social development, and wellness. New York: Gilford.Google Scholar
- Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the work-related basic need satisfaction scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 981–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar