Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 178–189 | Cite as

Basic psychological needs and work motivation: A longitudinal test of directionality

  • Anja H. Olafsen
  • Edward L. Deci
  • Hallgeir Halvari
Original Paper

Abstract

Most work-related studies of self-determination theory (SDT) have focused either on satisfaction of basic psychological needs or on types of work motivation when studying motivational processes at work. The few studies that have considered both mechanisms have usually assumed that satisfaction or frustration of basic psychological needs is a prerequisite of different types of work motivation. Nevertheless, the directionality of this relation has not been explicitly tested in previous studies of the workplace. The current study explored the relations among managerial need support, basic psychological need satisfaction at work, and work motivation. It tested competing sets of hypotheses regarding the directionality of these three core constructs within SDT’s model of work motivation. A longitudinal analysis suggested that managerial need support was positively directly related to basic psychological need satisfaction but not directly related to work motivation. Further, results indicated that basic psychological need satisfaction was related to work motivation over time and not the other way around. In addition, it was found an indirect relation between in managerial need support and in work motivation through in basic psychological need satisfaction. These findings have important implications for future SDT research testing process models in the workplace.

Keywords

Self-determination theory Managerial need support Basic psychological need satisfaction Work motivation Longitudinal 

Notes

Funding

This research is a part of a project supported by a grant from Buskerud University College Research Program in Management.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there are no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The data collection was approved by the Norwegian Social Science Data Services and participation was voluntary. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Albrecht, S. L. (2015). Challenge demands, hindrance demands, and psychological need satisfaction. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14(2), 70–79. doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, P. D. (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 545–557.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Mondejar, R., & Chu, C. W. L. (2015). Accounting for the influence of overall justice on job performance: Integrating self-determination and social exchange theories. Journal of Management Studies, 52(2), 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045–2068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentzen, M., Lemyre, P. N., & Kenttä, G. (2015). Changes in motivation and burnout indices in high-performance coaches over the course of a competitive season. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 28, 28–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980–1008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. De Cooman, R., Stynen, D., Van den Broeck, A., Sels, L., & De Witte, H. (2013). How job characteristics relate to need satisfaction and autonomous motivation: Implications for work effort. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(6), 1342–1352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 580–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: State of the science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes (Vol. 13). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 237–288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  17. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Enders, C. K. (2006). Analyzing structural equation models with missing data. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 313–342). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Fernet, C., Austin, S., & Vallerand, R. J. (2012). The effects of work motivation on employee exhaustion and commitment: An extension of the jd-r model. Work and Stress, 26(3), 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foss, N. J., Minbaeva, D. B., Pedersen, T., & Reinholt, M. (2009). Encouraging knowledge sharing among employees: How job design matters. Human Resource Management, 48(6), 871–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., Van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A., … Westbye, C. (2015). The multidimensional work motivation scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling techniques and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 7.Google Scholar
  24. Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 549–576.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Graves, L. M., & Luciano, M. M. (2013). Self-determination at work: Understanding the role of leader-member exchange. Motivation and Emotion, 37(3), 518–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Güntert, S. (2015). The impact of work design, autonomy support, and strategy on employee outcomes: A differentiated perspective on self-determination at work. Motivation and Emotion, 39(1), 74–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hardré, P. L., & Reeve, J. (2009). Training corporate managers to adopt a more autonomy-supportive motivating style toward employees: An intervention study. International Journal of Training and Development, 13(3), 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  30. Olafsen, A. H. (2016). Work motivation throught the lens of self-determination theory. (PhD), Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
  31. Olafsen, A. H. (2017). The implications of need-satisfying work climates on state mindfulness in a longitudinal analysis of work outcomes. Motivation and Emotion, 41(1), 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Olafsen, A. H., & Halvari, H. (2017). Motivational mechanisms in the relation between job characteristics and employee functioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2017.34.
  33. Olafsen, A. H., Halvari, H., Forest, J., & Deci, E. L. (2015). Show them the money? The role of pay, managerial need support, and justice in a self-determination theory model of intrinsic work motivation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56(4), 447–457.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Olafsen, A. H., Niemiec, C. P., Halvari, H., Deci, E. L., & Williams, G. C. (2017). On the dark side of work: A longitudinal analysis using self-determination theory. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 26(2), 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester: The University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  36. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Autonomy and basic psychological needs in human motivation, social development, and wellness. New York: Gilford.Google Scholar
  37. Tofighi, D., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). Rmediation: An r package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 692–700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Trépanier, S. G., Forest, J., Fernet, C., & Austin, S. (2015). On the psychological and motivational processes linking job characteristics to employee functioning: Insights from self-determination theory. Work and Stress, 29(3), 286–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., & Lens, W. (2008). Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Work and Stress, 22(3), 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the work-related basic need satisfaction scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 981–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23(3), 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297–333.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Williams, G. C., Halvari, H., Niemiec, C. P., Sørebø, Ø., Olafsen, A. H., & Westbye, C. (2014). Managerial support for basic psychological needs, somatic symptom burden and work-related correlates: A self-determination theory perspective. Work and Stress, 28(4), 404–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anja H. Olafsen
    • 1
  • Edward L. Deci
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Hallgeir Halvari
    • 1
  1. 1.University College of Southeast NorwayHønefossNorway
  2. 2.University of RochesterRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Australian Catholic UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations