Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 196–208 | Cite as

Personality and its links to quality of life: Mediating effects of emotion regulation and self-efficacy beliefs

  • Cornelia PocnetEmail author
  • Marc Dupuis
  • Anne Congard
  • Daniela Jopp
Original Paper

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between personality and quality of life (QoL) considering emotion regulation and self-efficacy beliefs as mediating factors. A total of 409 participants from the French-speaking regions of Switzerland and from France completed questionnaires on personality, emotion regulation, self-efficacy beliefs, and QoL. Our findings revealed that specific personality traits have significant direct and indirect effects on QoL, mediated by emotion regulation and self-efficacy. Particularly, neuroticism was strongly and negatively related to emotion regulation and QoL, but not significantly linked to self-efficacy, whereas extraversion and conscientiousness were positively associated with all variables. This is the first study to demonstrate that both emotion regulation and self-efficacy are important mechanisms that link specific personality traits to QoL, suggesting that they channel and modulate the personality effects. However, more work is needed to understand these relationships in more detail (e.g., how the personality traits concurrently influence each other as well as emotion regulation and self-efficacy).

Keywords

Personality Emotion regulation Self-efficacy beliefs Quality of life 

Notes

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Aluja, A., García, O., Rossier, J., & García, L. F. (2005). Comparison of the NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R and an alternative short version of the NEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 591–604. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.05.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Augustine, A. A., Hemenover, S. H., Larsen, R. J., & Shulman, T. E. (2010). Composition and consistency of the desired affective state: The role of personality and motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 133–143. doi: 10.1007/s11031-010-9162-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Augustine, A. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2015). Personality, affect, and affect regulation. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, M. L. Cooper & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol 4. Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 147–165). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  6. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2003). Personality predicts academic achievement: Evidence from two longitudinal university samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 319–338. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00578-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charles, S. T., Reynolds, C., & Gatz, M. (2001). Age-related differences and change in positive and negative affect over 23 years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 136–151. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.80.1.I36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668–678. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.38.4.668.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-Five-Factor (NEO-FFI) professional Manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  11. DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  12. Derryberry, D., Reed, A. M., & Pilkenton-Taylor, C. (2003). Temperament and coping: Advantages of an individual differences perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 1049–1066. doi: 10.1017/S0954579403000439.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. DeYoung, C. G., Hirsh, J. B., Shane, M. S., Papademetris, X., Rajeevan, N., & Gray, J. R. (2010). Testing predictions from personality neuroscience: Brain structure and the big five. Psychological Science, 21, 820–828. doi: 10.1177/0956797610370159.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dumont, M., Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (2000). Sentiment d’autoefficacité. Traduction française du Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (Jerusalem, & Schwarzer, 1992). http://userpage.fuberlin.de/~health/french.htm.
  16. Dupuis, M., Jopp, D., Congard, A. & Pocnet, C. (2016). Cross-national validation of a brief form of the WHO Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-12) in French. (Submitted)Google Scholar
  17. Duckworth, A. l., Weir, D., Tsukayama, E., & Kwok, D. (2012). Who does well in life? Conscientious adults excel in both objective and subjective success. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 356. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00356.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Eisenberg, N., & Spinrad, T. L. (2004). Emotion-related regulation: sharpening the definition. Child Development, 75, 334–339.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Field, N. P., Joudy, R., & Hart, D. (2010). The moderating effect of self-concept valence on the relationship between self-focused attention and mood: An experience sampling study. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Finch, J. F., Baranik, L. E., Liu, Y., & West, S. G. (2012). Physical health, positive and negative affect, and personality: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 537–545. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.05.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoyle, R. H. (2006). Personality and self-regulation: Trait and information-processing perspectives. Journal of Personality, 74, 1507–1526.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoyle, R. H., & Gallagher, P. (2015). The interplay of personality and self-regulation. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, M. L. Cooper & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol 4. Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 189–207). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for indexes in covariance structure analyses: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56–83. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jerusalem, M., & Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 195–213). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  25. Jopp, D., & Rott, C. (2006). Adaptation in very old age: Exploring the role of resources, beliefs, and attitudes for centenarians’ happiness. Psychology and Aging, 21, 266–280. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.266.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., & Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 107–127. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.107.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Keating, N., & Gaudet, N. (2012). Quality of life of persons with dementia. Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging, 16, 454–456. doi: 10.1007/s12603-011-0346-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kelly, W. E., & Johnson, J. L. (2005). Time use efficiency and the five-factor model of personality. Education, 125, 511–515.Google Scholar
  29. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principle and practice of structural modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kokkonen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Extraversion and neuroticism as antecedents of emotion regulation and dysregulation in adulthood. European Journal of Personality, 15, 407–424. doi: 10.1002/per.425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lepore, S. J., Fernandez-Berrocal, P., Ragan, J., & Ramos, N. (2000). It’s not that bad: Social challenges to emotional disclosure enhance adjustment to stress. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 17, 341–361. doi: 10.1080/10615800412331318625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Little, B. R., & Chambers, N. C. (2004). Personal project pursuit: On human doings and well-beings. In W. M. Cox & E. Klinger (Eds.), Handbook of motivational counselling (pp. 65–82). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Lucas, R. E., & Baird, B. M. (2004). Extraversion and emotional reactivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 473–485. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.473.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2015). Personality and subjective well-being: current issues and controversies. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, &amp Cooper & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol 4. Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 577–599). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., Grob, A., Suh, E. M., & Shao, L. (2000). Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 452–468.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lucas, R. E., & Fujita, F. (2000). Factors influencing the relation between extraversion and pleasant affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1039–1056. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1039.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maddux, J. E., & Volkmann, J. (2010). Self-efficacy. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 315–331). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Matthews, G., & Gilliand, K. (1999). The personality theories of H. J. Eysenck and J. A. Gray: A comparative review. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 583–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Matthews, G., & Zeidner, M. (2004). Traits, states and the trilogy of mind: An adaptive states perspective on intellectual functioning. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Strenberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 143–174). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  42. McCrae, R. R., & Löckenhoff, C. E. (2010). Self-regulation and the Five-Factor Model of personality traits. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 145–168). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Norem, J. K., & Chang, E. C. (2002). The positive psychology of negative thinking. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 993–1001. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10094.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Pocnet, C., Antonietti, J.-P., Rossier, J., Strippoli, M.-P., Glaus, J., & Preisig, M. (2016a). Personality, tobacco consumption, physical inactivity, obesity markers, and metabolic components as risk factors for cardiovascular disease in the general population. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 3, 1–8. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2016.1255767.Google Scholar
  45. Pocnet, C., Antonietti, J-P., Strippoli, M-P., Glaus, J., Preisig, M., & Rossier, J. (2016b). Individuals’quality of life linked to major life events, perceived social support, and personality traits. Quality of Research. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1296-4.Google Scholar
  46. Reicherts, M. (2007). Dimensions of openness to emotions (DOE): A model of affect processing. Manual. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  47. Reicherts, M., Genoud, P. A., & Zimmermann, G. (2012). L’ouverture emotionnelle : une nouvelle approche du vécu et du traitement émotionnels. Wavre: Mardaga.Google Scholar
  48. Roberts, B., Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 58, 103–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00301.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Bogg, T. (2005). Conscientiousness and health across the life course. Review of General Psychology, 9, 156–168. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schaefer, P. S., Williams, C. C., Goodie, A. S., & Campbell, W. K. (2004). Overconfidence and the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 473–480. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2003.09.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., & O’Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Quality of life research: an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 13, 299–310. doi:  10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Suls, J., & Martin, R. (2005). The daily life of the garden-variety neurotic: Reactivity, stressor exposure, mood spillover, and maladaptive coping. Journal of Personality, 73, 1485–1510.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Tamir, M. (2009). Differential preferences for happiness: Extraversion and trait-consistent emotion regulation. Journal of Personality, 77, 447–470. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00554.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Tsai, S. W-C., Chen, C. C., & Hui-Lu, L. (2007). Test of a model linking employee positive moods and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1570–1583. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1570.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Vollrath, M. (2001). Personality and stress. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42, 335–347.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–490. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.96.3.465.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Wilt, J., Nofle, E. E., Fleeson, W., & Spain, J. S. (2012). The dynamic role of personality states in mediating the relationship between extraversion and positive affect. Journal of Personality, 80, 1205–1236. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00756.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Wismeijer, A., & van Assen, M. (2008). Do neuroticism and extraversion explain the negative association between self-concealment and subjective well-being? Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 345–349. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wrosch, C., Miller, G. E., Scheier, M. F., & Brun de Pontet, S. (2007). Giving up on unattainable goals: Benefits for health? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 251–265. doi: 10.1177/0146167206294905.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Wrosch, C., & Scheier, M. F. (2003). Personality and quality of life: The importance of optimism and goal adjustment. Quality of Life Research, 12, 59–72. doi: 10.1023/A:1023529606137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Yik, M. S. M., Russell, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2011). A 12-point circumplex structure of core affect. Emotion, 11, 705–731. doi: 10.1037/a0023980.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cornelia Pocnet
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Marc Dupuis
    • 1
  • Anne Congard
    • 2
  • Daniela Jopp
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Aix Marseille UniversityAix en ProvenceFrance
  3. 3.Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research LIVES (NCCRs)University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations