Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 40, Issue 5, pp 667–680 | Cite as

Do you get what you pay for? Sales incentives and implications for motivation and changes in turnover intention and work effort

  • Bård KuvaasEmail author
  • Robert Buch
  • Marylène Gagné
  • Anders Dysvik
  • Jacques Forest
Original Paper

Abstract

This study investigated relations between pay-for-performance incentives designed to vary in instrumentality (annual pay-for-performance, quarterly pay-for-performance, and base pay level) and employee outcomes (self-reported work effort and turnover intention) in a longitudinal study spanning more than 2 years. After controlling for perceived instrumentality, merit pay increase, and the initial values of the dependent variables, the amount of base pay was positively related to work effort and negatively related to turnover intention, where both relationships were mediated by autonomous motivation. The amounts of quarterly and annual pay-for-performance were both positively related to controlled motivation, but were differently related to the dependent variables due to different relations with autonomous motivation.

Keywords

Pay-for-performance Motivation Work effort Turnover intention Self-determination theory 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, A. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045–2068. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes, C. M., Hollenbeck, J. R., Jundt, D. K., Scott DeRue, D., & Harmon, S. J. (2011). Mixing individual incentives and group incentives: Best of both worlds or social dilemma? Journal of Management, 37(6), 1611–1635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beer, M., & Cannon, M. D. (2004). Promise and peril in implementing pay-for-performance. Human Resource Management, 43(1), 3–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980–1008. doi: 10.1037/a0035661.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiu, S. F., & Chen, H. L. (2005). Relationship between job characteristics and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediational role of job satisfaction. Social Behavior and Personality, 33(6), 523–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 59, 501–528. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00045.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cox, A. (2005). The outcomes of variable pay systems: Tales of multiple cost and unforeseen consequences. International Journal Human Resource Management, 16(8), 1475–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Cooman, R., De Gieter, S., Pepermans, R., Jegers, M., & Van Acker, F. (2009). Development and validation of the work effort scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 266–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, A. M. (2000). The “what and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49(1), 14–23. doi: 10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Koestner, R. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DeVoe, S. E., & Iyengar, S. S. (2004). Managers’ theories of subordinates: A cross-cultural examination of manager perceptions of motivation and appraisal performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2008). The relationship between perceived training opportunities, work motivation and employee outcomes. International Journal of Training and Development, 12(3), 138–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Edgar, F., & Geare, A. (2005). HRM practice and employee attitudes: Different measures—different results. Personnel Review, 34(5), 534–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fall, A., & Roussel, P. (2014). Compensation and work motivation. In M. Gagné (Ed.), The oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory (pp. 199–217). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fang, M. Y., & Gerhart, B. (2012). Does pay for performance diminish intrinsic interest? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(6), 1176–1196. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2011.561227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2005). Economic language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Foss, N. J., Minbaeva, D. B., Pedersen, T., & Reinholt, M. (2009). Enhancing knowledge sharing among employees: How job design matters. Human Resource Management, 48(6), 871–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233–239.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27(3), 199–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gagné, M. (2014). The oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. doi: 10.1002/job.322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gagné, M., & Forest, J. (2008). The study of compensation through the lens of self-determination theory: Reconciling 35 years of debate. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gardner, D. G., Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). The effects of pay level on organization-based self-esteem and performance: A field study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. (2014). Pay for (individual) performance: Issues, claims, evidence and the role of sorting effects. Human Resource Management Review, 24, 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. (2015). Pay, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, performance, and creativity in the workplace: Revisiting long-held beliefs. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 489–521. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gerhart, B., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Compensation: Theory, evidence, and strategic implications. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Gerhart, B., Rynes, S. L., & Fulmer, I. S. (2009). Pay and performance: Indivduals, groups, and executives. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 251–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harrison, D. A., Virick, M., & William, S. (1996). Working without a net: Time, performance, and turnover under maximally contingent rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 331–345. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heath, C. (1999). On the social psychology of agency relationships: Lay theories of motivation overemphasize extrinsic incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78(1), 25–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heneman, R. L., Ledford, G. E. J., & Gresham, M. T. (2000). The changing nature of work and its effects on compensation design and delivery. In S. L. Rynes & B. Gerhart (Eds.), Compensation in organizations: Current research and practice (pp. 195–240). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  39. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Coventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332–1356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jenkins, G. D., Gupta, N., Mitra, A., & Shaw, J. D. (1998). Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(5), 777–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kerr, S. (1975). On the folly of rewarding a, while hoping for b. Academy of Management Journal, 18(4), 769–783.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Khilji, S. E., & Wang, X. (2006). “Intended” and “implemented” HRM: The missing linchpin in strategic human resource management research. International Journal Human Resource Management, 17(7), 1171–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kuvaas, B. (2006). Work performance, affective commitment, and work motivation: The roles of pay administration and pay level. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 365–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kuvaas, B. (2009). A test of hypotheses derived from self-determination theory among public sector employees. Employee Relations, 31(1), 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kuvaas, B., & Dysvik, A. (2010). Permanent employee investment and social exchange and psychological cooperative climate among temporary employees. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 32(2), 261–284. doi: 10.1177/0143831X10371990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lawler, E. E. I. (1971). Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  48. Lawler, E. E. I., & Finegold, D. (2000). Individualizing the organization: Past present and future. Organizational Dynamics, 29(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lazear, E. P. (2000). Performance pay and productivity. The American Economic Review, 90(5), 1346–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Locke, E. A., Feren, D. B., McCaled, V. M., Shaw, K. N., & Denny, A. T. (1980). The relative effectiveness of four methods of motivating employee performance. In K. D. Duncan, M. M. Gruenberg, & D. Wallis (Eds.), Changes in working life (pp. 363–388). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Magee, J. C., Kilduff, G. J., & Heath, C. (2011). On the folly of principal’s power: Managerial psychology as a cause of bad incentives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 25–41. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2011.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Meyer, J. P., & Gagné, M. (2008). Employee engagement from a self-determination theory perspective. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 60–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moller, A. C., & Deci, E. L. (2014). The psychology of getting paid: An integrated perspective. In E. Bijleveld & H. Aarts (Eds.), The psychological science of money (pp. 189–211). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  54. Nyberg, A. (2010). Retaining your high performers: Moderators of the performance-job satisfaction-voluntary turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 440–453. doi: 10.1037/a0018869.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nyberg, A. J., Pieper, J. R., & Trevor, C. O. (2013). Raboyee performance: Integrating psychological and economic principles toward a contingency perspecctive. Journal of Management,. doi: 10.1177/0149206313515520.Google Scholar
  56. Peterson, S. J., & Luthans, F. (2006). The impact of financial and nonfinancial incentives on business-unit outcomes over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 156–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pfeffer, J. (1998). Six dangerous myths about pay. Harvard Business Review, 76(3), 108–119.Google Scholar
  58. Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Richer, S. F., Blanchard, C., & Vallerand, R. J. (2002). A motivational model of work turnover. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(10), 2089–2113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Salamin, A., & Hom, P. W. (2005). In search of the elusive u-shaped performance-turnover relationship: Are high performing swiss bankers more liable to quit? Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1204–1216. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2001). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  62. Shore, L. M., Tetrick, L. E., Lynch, P., & Barksdale, K. (2006). Social and economic exchange: Construct development and validation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(4), 837–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (2003). Behavioral management and task performance in organizations: Conceptual backgrounds, meta-analysis, and test of alternative models. Personnel Psychology, 56, 155–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thierry, H. (2001). The reflection theory on compensation. In M. Erez, U. Kleinbeck, & H. Theirry (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalazing economy (pp. 149–166). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  65. Thierry, H. (2002). Enhancing performance through pay and reward systems. In S. Sonnentag (Ed.), Psychological management of individual performance (pp. 325–347). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  66. Trevor, C. O., Gerhart, B., & Boudreau, J. W. (1997). Voluntary turnover and job performance: Curvilinearity and the moderating influences of salary growth and promotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 44–61. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., & Lens, W. (2008). Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Work and Stress, 22(3), 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vansteenkiste, M., Neyrinck, B., Niemiec, C., Soenens, B., De Witte, H., & Van den Broeck, A. (2007). On the relations among work value orientations, psychological need satisfaction and job outcomes: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(2), 251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  70. Weibel, A., Rost, K., & Osterloh, M. (2010). Pay for performance in the public sector: Benefits and (hidden) costs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yeo, G. B., & Neal, A. (2004). A multilevel analysis of effort, practice, and performance: Effects of ability, conscientiousness, and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 231–247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zenger, T. R., & Marshall, C. R. (2000). Determinants of incentive intensity in group-based rewards. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 149–163. doi: 10.2307/1556373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BI Norwegian Business SchoolOsloNorway
  2. 2.Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied SciencesOsloNorway
  3. 3.The University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Organization and Human ResourceESG-UQAMStation Centre-ville, MontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations