Articulating ideology: How liberals and conservatives justify political affiliations using morality-based explanations
Two studies examined the degree to which participants’ were aware of their morality-based motivations when determining their political affiliations. Participants from the U.S. indicated what political party (if any) they affiliated with and explained their reasons for that affiliation. For participants who identified as “Liberal/Democrat” or “Conservative/Republican,” coders read the responses and identified themes associated with Moral Foundations Theory. In Study 1, thematic differences between liberals and conservatives paralleled previous research, although the extent of the disparities was more pronounced than expected, with the two groups showing little overlap. In Study 2, the actual influence of Moral Foundations (as measured by the Moral Foundations Questionnaire) was dramatically greater than was indicated by the coding of participants’ open-ended responses. In addition, actual disparities in use of Moral Foundations between liberals and conservatives were greater than participants’ stereotyped perceptions. We discuss how this research furthers our understanding of conscious motivations for political affiliation and can help to facilitate political discourse.
KeywordsPolitical affiliation Moral foundations theory Resistance to change
- Anderson, S., Kellogg, R., Langer, A., & Sallee, J. (2013). The intergenerational transmission of automobile brand preferences: Empirical evidence and implications for firm strategy. Working Paper 19535. Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research website: http://www.nber.org/papers/w19535 doi: 10.3386/w19535.
- Federico, C. M., Ergun, D., & Hunt, C. (2014). Opposition to equality and support for tradition as mediators of the relationship between epistemic motivation and system-justifying identifications. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17, 524–541. doi: 10.1177/1368430213517273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. New York, NY: Bantam.Google Scholar
- Hooghe, M., & Wilkenfeld, B. (2008). The stability of political attitudes and behaviors across adolescence and early adulthood: A comparison of survey data on adolescents and young adults in eight countries. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 155–167. doi: 10.1007/s10964-007-9199-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
- Lahti, D. C. (2009). The correlated history of social organization, morality, and religion. In E. Voland & W. Schiefenhovel (Eds.), The biological evolution of religious mind and behavior: The frontiers collection (pp. 67–88). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-00128-4_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mann, T. E., & Ornstein, N. J. (2012). It’s even worse than it looks: How the American constitutional system collided with the new politics of extremism. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Neuman, S. (2012). Just how independent are Independent voters? Retrieved December 24, 2013, from http://www.npr.org/2012/03/26/149402358/just-how-independent-are-independent-voters.
- Newport, F. (2010). Tea Party supporters overlap Republican base. Retrieved February 4, 2016, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/141098/tea-party-supporters-overlap-republican-base.aspx.#!mn-us.
- Pruitt, D. G., Carnevale, P. J. D., Ben-Yoav, O., Nochajski, T. H., & Van Slyck, M. (1983). Incentives for cooperation in integrative bargaining. In R. Tietz (Ed.), Aspiration levels in bargaining and economic decision making (pp. 22–34). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Wilson, G. D. (1973). A dynamic theory of conservatism. In G. D. Wilson (Ed.), The psychology of conservatism (pp. 257–265). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Wilson, T. D. (2002). Strangers in ourselves: Discovering the adaptive unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar