Comparing the effects of low-level and high-level worker need-satisfaction: A synthesis of the self-determination and Maslow need theories
- 3k Downloads
According to Maslow’s (Psychol Rev 50:370–396, 1943) hierarchical theory of needs, people do not become sensitized to “higher” level needs until they have satisfied their “lower” level needs (a moderator hypothesis); until then, they are unprepared to benefit from higher-level satisfactions. But according to the self-determination theory (SDT) model, high-level psychological needs, when met, are non-contingently beneficial (a main effect-only hypothesis). In two large-N studies of Russian energy companies, we measured low-level need-satisfaction in terms of felt security and felt financial satisfaction, and measured high-level need satisfaction in terms of SDT’s basic needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. In both studies, both the lower level and higher level need-satisfaction sets had strong main effects upon many positive work outcomes, including intrinsic motivation, organizational commitment, and SWB. In Study 2, Maslow’s “prepared to benefit” hypothesis was supported, in that satisfaction of high-level needs had slightly larger effects on outcomes when combined with satisfaction of low-level needs. However this was not found in Study 1. Potentials for integrating the SDT and Maslow need theories are discussed.
KeywordsPsychological needs Basic needs Maslow’s theory Self-determination theory Organizations in Russia Well-being at work Work engagement
Compliance with ethical standards
Compliance with ethical standards: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of interest
- Batarshev, A. V. (2002). Integral’naya udovletvorennost’ trudom [Integral work satisfaction]. In N. P. Fetiskin, V. V. Kozlov, & G. M. Manuilov (Eds.), Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti i malykh grupp [Social psychological diagnostics of small groups] (pp. 470–473). Moskva: Izd-vo Instituta psikhoterapii.Google Scholar
- Busseri, M. A., & Sadava, S. W. (2011). A review of the tripartite structure of subjective well- being: Implications for conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and synthesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(3), 290–314. doi: 10.1177/1088868310391271.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gagné, M., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2013). Self-determination theory’s contribution to positive organizational psychology. In A. B. Bakker & A. B. Bakker (Eds.), Advances in positive organizational psychology (pp. 61–82). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. doi: 10.1108/S2046-410X(2013)0000001006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kasser, T. (2002). The high price of materialism. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Maslow, A. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
- McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Osin, E., Ivanova, T., & Gordeeva, T. (2013). Autonomous and controlled professional motivation predict subjective well-being in Russian employees. Organizational Psychology - Russia, 3(1), 8–29. (in Russian: Abstract in English).Google Scholar
- Reid-Cunningham, A. (2008). Maslow’s theory of motivation and hierarchy of human needs: A critical analysis. Unpublished dissertation.Google Scholar
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, L. A. Pervin, O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 654–678). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). Test manual for the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Utrecht University, the Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.schaufeli.com.
- Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1996). Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey. In C. Maslach, S. E. Jackson, & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), The Maslach Burnout Inventory—Test manual (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2014). Burnout, boredom and engagement at the workplace. In M. Peeters, J. de Jonge, & T. Taris (Eds.), People at work: An introduction to contemporary work psychology (pp. 293–320). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar