Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 39, Issue 5, pp 680–692 | Cite as

Why do(n’t) you like me? The role of social approach and avoidance motives in attributions following social acceptance and rejection

  • Simone SchochEmail author
  • Jana Nikitin
  • Alexandra M. Freund
Original Paper

Abstract

The present research aimed at answering the question why people differ in their way of attributing experienced social acceptance and rejection. Using a motivational approach, two scenario studies (Study 1, N = 280; Study 2, N = 232) and one study using actual social interactions (Study 3, N = 128) supported the hypothesis that dispositional social approach motives are associated with attributions following social acceptance (β = .16–.23, p < .001) but not social rejection (β = −.03 to −.06, p > .13), whereas dispositional social avoidance motives are associated with attributions following social rejection (β = .23–.29, p < .001) but not social acceptance (β = −.02 to −.08, p > .07). These studies demonstrate that social approach and avoidance motives are differentially predictive in social situations with positive compared to negative outcomes. Moreover, social motives play an important role in people’s attributions following their experiences of social acceptance or rejection. Taken together, the three studies suggest that people’s explanations of social acceptance and rejection differ as a function of what they generally want and fear in social interactions.

Keywords

Social motives Approach Avoidance Attribution Social interactions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Grant 100014_126868/1 (Project “Social Approach and Avoidance Motivation—The Role of Age”) from the Swiss National Science Foundation (PIs: Jana Nikitin and Alexandra M. Freund). We thank the Life-Management team for helpful discussions of the work reported in this article, and Mirjam Dönni, Christian Gross, and Mahmoud Hemmo for their help with data collection.

References

  1. Alden, L. (1986). Self-efficacy and causal attributions for social feedback. Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 460–473. doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(86)90126-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, C. A., & Jennings, D. L. (1980). When experiences of failure promote expectations of success: The impact of attribution failure to ineffective strategies. Journal of Personality, 48, 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brodt, S. E., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1981). Modifying shyness-related social behavior through symptom misattribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 437–449. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.437.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (1994). Temperament and attention: Orienting toward and away from positive and negative signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1128–1139. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.6.1128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Feather, N. T. (1969). Attribution of responsibility and valence of success and failure in relation to initial confidence and task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 129–144. doi: 10.1037/h0028071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feather, N. T., & Simon, J. G. (1971). Causal attributions for success and failure in relation to expectations of success based upon selective or manipulative control. Journal of Personality, 39, 527–541. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1971.tb00060.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gable, S. L. (2006). Approach and avoidance social motives and goals. Journal of Personality, 74, 175–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00373.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gable, S. L., & Berkman, E. T. (2008). Making connections and avoiding loneliness: Approach and avoidance social motives and goals. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 204–216). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gable, S. L., & Impett, E. A. (2012). Approach and avoidance motives and close relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 95–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00405.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gable, S. L., & Poore, J. (2008). Which thoughts count? Algorithms for evaluating satisfaction in relationships. Psychological Science, 19, 1030–1036. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02195.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., & Elliot, A. J. (2003). Evidence for bivariate systems: An empirical test of appetition and aversion across domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 349–372. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00580-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gardner, W. L., Pickett, C. L., & Brewer, M. B. (2000). Social exclusion and selective memory: How the need to belong influences memory for social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 486–496. doi: 10.1177/0146167200266007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gomez, A., & Gomez, R. (2002). Personality traits of the behavioural approach and inhibition systems: Associations with processing of emotional stimuli. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1299–1316. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00119-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley. doi: 10.1037/10628-000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Higgins, T., & Tykocinski, O. (1992). Self-discrepancies and biographical memory: Personality and cognition at the level of psychological situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 527–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kinderman, P., & Bentall, P. (1996). A new measure of causal locus: The internal, personal and situational attributions questionnaire. Personal Individual Differences, 20, 261–264. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(95)00186-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Annual review of psychology. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  19. Mehrabian, A. (1970). The development and validation of measures of affiliative tendency and sensitivity to rejection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 417–428. doi: 10.1177/001316447003000226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mehrabian, A. (1994). Evidence bearing on the affiliative tendency (MAFF) and sensitivity to rejection (MSR) scales. Current Psychology, 13, 97–117. doi: 10.1007/BF02686794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mehrabian, A., & Ksionzky, S. (1974). A theory of affiliation. Lexington, MA: Health.Google Scholar
  22. Metalsky, G. I., Halberstadt, L. J., & Abramson, L. Y. (1987). Vulnerability to depressive mood reactions: Toward a more powerful test of the diathesis–stress and causal mediation components of the reformulated theory of depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 386–393. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.386.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 711–747. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.711.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213–225. doi: 10.1037/h0076486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morris, S. J. (2007). Attributional biases in subclinical depression: A schema-based account. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 47, 32–47. doi: 10.1002/cpp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nikitin, J., Burgermeister, L. C., & Freund, A. M. (2012). The role of age and social motivation in developmental transitions in young and old adulthood. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nikitin, J., & Freund, A. M. (2008). The role of social approach and avoidance motives for subjective well-being and the successful transition to adulthood. Applied Psychology, 57, 90–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00356.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nikitin, J., & Freund, A. M. (2010). When wanting and fearing go together: The effect of co-occurring social approach and avoidance motivation on behavior, affect, and cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 783–804. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.650.Google Scholar
  29. Nikitin, J., & Freund, A. M. (2011). Age and motivation predict gaze behavior for facial expressions. Psychology and Aging, 26, 695–700. doi: 10.1037/a0023281.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Nikitin, J., Schoch, S., & Freund, A. M. (2014). The role of age and motivation for the experience of social acceptance and rejection. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1943–1950. doi: 10.1037/a0036979.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Peterson, C., & Buchanan, G. M. (1995). Explanatory style: History and evolution of the field. In G. M. Buchanan & M. E. P. Seligman (Eds.), Explanatory style (pp. 1–20). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Pickett, C. L., Gardner, W. L., & Knowles, M. (2004). Getting a cue: The need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1095–1107. doi: 10.1177/0146167203262085.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Poppe, P., Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., & Pelster, A. (2005). Attributionsstilfragebogen für Erwachsene: ASF-E [Attributional pattern questionnaire for adults]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  34. Romero-Canyas, R., & Downey, G. (2012). What I see when I think it’s about me: People low in rejection-sensitivity downplay cues of rejection in self-relevant interpersonal situations. Emotion, 13, 104–117. doi: 10.1037/a0029786.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Romero-Canyas, R., Downey, G., Berenson, K., Ayduk, O., & Kang, N. J. (2010). Rejection sensitivity and the rejection–hostility link in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality, 78, 119–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00611.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sedikides, C., & Alicke, M. D. (2012). Self-enhancement and self-protection motives. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), Oxford handbook of motivation (pp. 303–322). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0017.Google Scholar
  37. Sokolowski, K. (1986). Kognitionen und Emotionen in anschlussthematischen Situationen [Cognitions and emotions in affiliative situations]. Wuppertal: Bergische Universität.Google Scholar
  38. Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (1989). Attributional style and depressive mood reactions. Journal of Personality, 57, 581–599. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00564.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Strachman, A., & Gable, S. L. (2006). What you want (and do not want) affects what you see (and do not see): Avoidance social goals and social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1446–1458. doi: 10.1177/0146167206291007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 1–14. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1273-8_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weiner, B., Frieze, I., Kukla, A., Reed, L., Rest, S., & Rosenbaum, R. M. (1987). Perceiving the causes of success and failure. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 95–120). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Schoch
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Jana Nikitin
    • 1
  • Alexandra M. Freund
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.University Research Priority Program Dynamics of Healthy AgingUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Zurich University of Teacher EducationZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations