The effect of age and time perspective on implicit motives
- 619 Downloads
People differ in how open-ended or limited they perceive their future. We argue that individual differences in future time perspective affect the activation of implicit motives. Perceiving the time remaining for the satisfaction of one’s motives as limited should be associated with a higher activation of these motives than perceiving one’s future as more open-ended. Given that future time perspective decreases across adulthood, older adults should score higher on implicit motives than younger adults. This hypothesis was supported in a study with young (n = 53, age M = 25.60 years) and older adults (n = 55, age M = 68.05 years). Additionally, an experimental manipulation of future time perspective showed that age-related differences in implicit motives are influenced by future time perspective. These findings demonstrate that future time perspective is an important factor to explain the strength of motives.
KeywordsImplicit motives Future time perspective Adult age differences Lifespan development
This research was supported by Grant 100014_126868/1 (Project “Social Approach and Avoidance Motive—The Role of Age”) from the Swiss National Science Foundation (PIs: Jana Nikitin and Alexandra M. Freund).
- Gawronski, B., Hofmann, W., & Wilbur, C. (2006). Are “implicit” attitudes unconscious? Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 485–499. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.11.007.
- Gjesme, T. (1996). Future time orientation and motivation. In T. Gjesme & R. Nygård (Eds.), Advances in motivation (pp. 210–224). Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
- Leiner, D. (2010). SoSci Survey (Version 2.0) [Computer Software]. Available from http://www.soscisurvey.de.
- Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- McClelland, D. C., & Winter, D. G. (1969). Motivating economic achievement. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Miller, N. E. (1944). Experimental studies on conflict. In J. M. Hunt (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders (pp. 431–465). New York, NY: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
- Schultheiss, O. C., & Brunstein, J. C. (2010). Implicit motives. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195335156.001.0001.
- Schultheiss, O. C., Liening, S. H., & Schad, D. (2008). The reliability of a Picture Story Exercise measure of implicit motives: Estimates of internal consistency, retest reliability, and ipsative stability. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1560–1571. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schultheiss, O. C., & Pang, J. S. (2007). Measuring implicit motives. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 322–344). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Smith, C. P., Feld, S. C., & Franz, C. E. (1992). Methodological considerations: Steps in research employing content analysis systems. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 515–536). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thrash, T. M., Cassidy, S. E., Maruskin, L. A., & Elliot, A. J. (2010). Factors that influence the relation between implicit and explicit motives: A general implicit-explicit congruence framework. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 308–346). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Winter, D. G. (1994). Manual for scoring motive imagery in running text. Department of Psychology, University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI: unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- Wrosch, C., & Heckhausen, J. (2005). Being on-time or off-time: Developmental deadlines for regulating one’s own development. In A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Ed.), Thinking time: A multidisciplinary perspective on time (pp. 110–123). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar