Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 855–865 | Cite as

Effects of deterrence on intensity of group identification and efforts to protect group identity

  • Giuseppe Pantaleo
  • Anca M. Miron
  • Mark A. Ferguson
  • Scott D. Frankowski
Original Paper

Abstract

Group identification serves important functions such as motivating group members to work towards group goals and sustaining their efforts to maintain a positive group identity. Thus increasing or decreasing group identification has implications for group members’ commitment to achieving group goals. We propose that group identification and group-level efforts to protect group identity can be reduced or enhanced by deterrents to feeling identified with the ingroup. To test this idea, we exposed participants to different types of deterrents to group identification: a reason for not liking the ingroup (Study 1), difficulty of achieving an ingroup goal (Study 2), and a threat to ingroup positive identity (Study 3). Group identification and strength of efforts to achieve a group goal increased with the strength of deterrence, to the point where it decreased in the strong deterrent condition. Implications for intergroup motivation and social identity are discussed.

Keywords

Group identification Motivation Identity threats Deterrence Effort 

References

  1. Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2000). You can’t always do what you want: Social identity and self-presentational determinants of the choice to work for a low-status group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 891–906. doi: 10.1177/01461672002610001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bar-Tal, D. (2013). Intractable conflicts: Socio-psychological foundations and dynamics. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999a). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35–58). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Branscombe, N. R., & Miron, A. M. (2004). Interpreting the ingroup’s negative actions toward another group: Emotional reactions to appraised harm. In L. Z. Tiedens & C. W. Leach (Eds.), The social life of emotions (pp. 314–335). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999b). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135–149. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Schiffhauer, K. (2007). Racial attitudes in response to thoughts of White privilege. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 203–215. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brehm, J. W. (1999). The intensity of emotion. Personality and Social Psychological Review, 3, 2–22. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brehm, J. W., & Miron, A. M. (2006). Can the simultaneous experience of opposing emotions really occur? Motivation and Emotion, 30, 13–30. doi: 10.1007/s11031-006-9007-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brehm, J. W., Miron, A. M., & Miller, K. (2009). Affect as a motivational state. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 1069–1089. doi: 10.1080/02699930802323642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. A. (1989). The intensity of motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 109–131. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000545.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366–375. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414–446. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deaux, K. (1996). Social identification. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 857–915). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  15. Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of group-based guilt: The effects of ingroup identification. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 325–338. doi: 10.1177/1368430206064637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doosje, B., Spears, R., & Ellemers, N. (2002). Social identity as both cause and effect: The development of group identification in response to anticipated and actual changes in the intergroup status hierarchy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 57–76. doi: 10.1348/014466602165054.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellemers, N., Van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 233–246. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00902.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Higgins, E. T. (2006). Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review, 113, 439–460. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.439.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1993). Towards a single-process uncertainty reduction model of social motivation in groups. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 173–190). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  20. Jetten, J., & Branscombe, N. R. (2006). Living on the edge: Dynamics of intragroup and intergroup rejection experiences. In R. Brown & D. Capozza (Eds.), Social identities: Motivational, emotional and cultural influences (pp. 91–107). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Klein, O., Licata, L., & Pierucci, S. (2011). Does group identification facilitate or prevent collective guilt about past misdeeds? Resolving the paradox. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 563–572. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02028.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klein, O., Spears, R., & Reicher, S. (2007). Social identity performance: Extending the strategic side of SIDE. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 1–18. doi: 10.1177/1088868306294588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., et al. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multi-component) model of ingroup identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144–165. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maitner, A. T., Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and guilt following ingroup aggression. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 223–237. doi: 10.1177/1368430207075154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miron, A. M., Branscombe, N. R., & Biernat, M. (2010). Motivated shifting of justice standards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 768–779. doi: 10.1177/0146167210370031.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miron, A. M., & Brehm, J. W. (2012). Emotional intensity theory and its cardiovascular implications for emotional states. In R. A. Wright & G. H. E. Gendolla (Eds.), How motivation affects cardiovascular response: Mechanisms and applications (pp. 121–137). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miron, A. M., Ferguson, M. A., & Peterson, A. (2011). Difficulty of refusal to assist the outgroup nonmonotonically affects the intensity of prejudiced affect. Motivation and Emotion, 45, 484–498. doi: 10.1007/s11031-011-9220-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miron, A. M., Knepfel, D., & Parkinson, S. K. (2009). The surprising effect of partner flaws and qualities on romantic affect. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 261–276. doi: 10.1007/sl1031-009-9138-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pantaleo, G. (2011). Enjoying multiplicity: From familiarity to ‘Multiple Perspectives’. In M. Cadinu, S. Galdi, & A. Maass (Eds.), Social perception, cognition, and language in honour of Arcuri (pp. 51–65). Padua: Cleup.Google Scholar
  31. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roberson, B. F., & Wright, R. A. (1994). Difficulty as a determinant of interpersonal appeal: A social-motivational application of energization theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 373–388. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp1503_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schmitt, M. T., Miller, D. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Brehm, J. W. (2008). The difficulty of making reparations affects the intensity of collective guilt. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11, 267–279. doi: 10.1177/1368430208090642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shah, J. Y., & Gardner, W. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of Motivation Science. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  35. Silvia, P. J., & Brehm, J. W. (2001). Exploring alternative deterrents to emotional intensity: Anticipated happiness, distraction, and sadness. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 575–592. doi: 10.1080/02699930143000040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Steele, C. M. (2011). Whistling Vivaldi: How stereotypes affect us and what we can do. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  37. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups. Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  38. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  40. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Veenstra, K., & Haslam, S. A. (2000). Willingness to participate in industrial protest: Exploring social identification in context. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 153–172. doi: 10.1348/014466607X231091.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Walker, I., & Mann, L. (1987). Unemployment, relative deprivation and social protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 275–283. doi: 10.1177/0146167287132012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wright, R. A., & Brehm, J. W. (1989). Energization and goal attractiveness. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology (pp. 169–210). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Wright, R. A., & Gendolla, G. H. E. (Eds.). (2012). How motivation affects cardiovascular response: Mechanisms and applications. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  45. Wright, R. A., & Pantaleo, G. (2013). Effort processes in achieving performance outcomes: Interrelations among and roles of core constructs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 705–706. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13001180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe Pantaleo
    • 1
  • Anca M. Miron
    • 2
  • Mark A. Ferguson
    • 3
  • Scott D. Frankowski
    • 4
  1. 1.UniSR-Social.Lab, San Raffaele University of MilanMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Wisconsin OshkoshOshkoshUSA
  3. 3.University of Wisconsin-Stevens PointStevens PointUSA
  4. 4.University of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA

Personalised recommendations