Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 63–73 | Cite as

Mothers’ motivation for involvement in their children’s schooling: mechanisms and outcomes

Original Paper

Abstract

While research has examined factors associated with parent involvement, little work has focused on why parents are involved in their children’s schooling. This study thus assessed mothers’ motivation for involvement (measured on a continuum of autonomy), their level of involvement, and their affect when involved in relation to children’s motivation and academic performance. Participants were 178 fourth, fifth, and sixth grade students and their mothers. More autonomous motivation (identified, intrinsic) for involvement positively related to mothers’ levels of involvement and positive affect when involved. Identified motivation, as well as parental level of involvement, related to children’s academic perceived competence, self-worth, and reading grades. Results supported mediational models in which identified motivation was associated with higher academic perceived competence through cognitive involvement and reading grades through increased cognitive and personal involvement. For self-worth, there was an indirect path from identified motivation through personal involvement as well as a significant direct path. Results stress the importance of considering why parents are involved, especially when developing interventions to increase parent involvement.

Keywords

Parent involvement Motivation for involvement Children’s motivation Children’s school performance 

References

  1. Arbuckle, J. L. (2010). IBM SPSS Amos 19user’s guide. Spring House: Amos Development Corporation.Google Scholar
  2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effect of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouchard, G., Lee, C. M., Asgary, V., & Pelletier, L. (2007). Fathers’ motivation for involvement with their children: A self-determination theory perspective. Fathering, 5, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burton, K. D., Lydon, J. E., D’Alessandro, D. U., & Koestner, R. (2006). The differential effects of intrinsic and identified motivation on well-being and performance: Prospective, experiential, and implicit approaches to self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 750–762.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabrera, N. J., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Bradley, R. H., Hofferth, S., & Lamb, M. E. (2000). Fatherhood in the twenty-first century. Child Development, 71, 127–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Epstein, J. L. (1986). Parents’ reactions to teacher practices of parent involvement. The Elementary School Journal, 86, 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epstein, J. L., & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2001). More than minutes: Teachers roles in designing homework. Educational Psychologist, 36, 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fan, W., & Williams, C. M. (2010). The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self-efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology, 30, 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gonzalez-DeHass, A., Willems, P., & Holbein, M. (2005). Examining the relationship between parental involvement and student motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Green, C. L., Walker, J. M. T., Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (2007). Parents’ motivation for involvement in children’s education: An empirical test of a theoretical model of parental involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 532–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grolnick, W. S., Benjet, C., Kurowski, C. O., & Apostoleris, N. (1997). Predictors of parent involvement in children’s schooling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 538–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grolnick, W. S., Gurland, S., DeCourcey, W., & Jacob, K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of mothers’ autonomy support: An empirical investigation. Developmental Psychology, 38, 143–155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grolnick, W., & Slowiaczek, M. (1994). Parents’ involvement in children’s schooling: A multi-dimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development, 65, 237–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grolnick, W., & Wellborn, J. (1988). Parent influences on children’s school-related self-system processes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Google Scholar
  19. Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The padex. In L. Lazerfel (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258–348). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740–763.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hokoda, A., & Fincham, F. D. (1995). Origins of children’s helpless and mastery achievement patterns in the family. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hong, S., & Ho, H. (2005). Direct and indirect longitudinal effects of parental involvement on student achievement: Second order latent growth modeling across ethnic groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Bassler, O. C., & Brissie, J. S. (1992). Explorations in parent–school relations. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 287–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Walker, J. M. T., Sandler, H. M., Whetsel, D., Green, C. L., Wilkins, A. S., et al. (2005). Why do parents become involved? Research findings and implications. The Elementary School Journal, 106, 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jeynes, W. H. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relation of parental involvement to urban elementary school student academic achievement. Urban Education, 40, 237–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jeynes, W. H. (2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Urban Education, 42, 82–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Katz, I., Kaplan, A., & Buzukashvily, T. (2011). The role of parents’ motivation in students’ autonomous motivation for doing homework. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 376–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim, Y., Carver, C. S., Deci, E. L., & Kasser, T. (2008). Adult attachment and psychological well-being in cancer caregivers: The mediational role of spouses’ motives for caregiving. Health Psychology, 27, 5144–5154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koestner, R., Losier, G. F., Vallerand, R. J., & Carducci, D. (1996). Identified and introjected forms of political internalization: Extending self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1025–1036.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediational analysis. NY: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  32. Marchant, G. J., Paulson, S. E., & Rothlisberg, B. A. (2001). Relations of middle school students’ perceptions of family and school contexts with academic achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Muris, P., Meesters, C., & Fijen, P. (2003). The self-perception profile for children: Further evidence for its factor structure, reliability, and validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1791–1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nix, G. A., Ryan, R. M., Manly, J. B., & Deci, E. L. (1999). Revitalization through self-regulation: The effects of autonomous and controlled motivation on happiness and vitality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 266–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Girgus, J. S., & Seligman, M. E. (1992). Predictors and consequences of childhood depressive symptoms: A 5-year longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 259–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Briere, N. M. (2002). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 279–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pomerantz, E. M., Moorman, E. A., & Litwack, S. D. (2007). The how, whom, and why of parents’ involvement in children’s academic lives: More is not always better. Review of Educational Research, 77, 373–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pomerantz, E. M., Wang, Q., & Ng, F. F. (2005). Mothers’ affect in the homework context: The importance of staying positive. Developmental Psychology, 41, 414–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reeve, J. (1989). The interest–enjoyment distinction in intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 13, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the interpersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sanders, M. G. (1998). The effects of school, family, and community support on the academic achievement of African American adolescents. Urban Education, 33, 385–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shevlin, M., Adamson, G., & Collins, K. (2003). The self-perception profile for children (SPPC): A multiple-indicator multiple-wave analysis using LISREL. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1993–2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in three life domains: The role of parents’ and teachers’ autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P. (1987). The family–school relation and the child’s school performance. Child Development, 58, 1348–1357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 271–360). NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Vallerand, R. J., & Bissonnette, R. (1992). On the predictive effects of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles on behavior: A prospective study. Journal of Personality, 60, 599–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic role of intrinsic goals and autonomy support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246–260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 222–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyClark UniversityWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations