Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 367–377

Helpful but insufficient: Incremental theory on challenge-confronting tendencies for students who fear being laughed at

  • Cheng-Hong Liu
  • Fa-Chung Chiu
  • Hsueh-Chih Chen
  • Ching-Yi Lin
Original Paper

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that endorsing an incremental theory of intelligence is helpful in motivating students to confront challenges. We used a survey to examine whether this theory could predict greater challenge-confronting tendencies for students with relatively high gelotophobia (i.e., the fear of being laughed at) and explore the possible underlying processes. A total of 264 senior high school students completed the measures of gelotophobia, implicit theories of intelligence, challenge-confronting tendencies, perceived value and feelings of being threatened in confronting challenges, and their self-perceived general ability. The results showed that endorsing an incremental theory predicted greater perceived value in confronting challenges and stronger challenge-confronting tendencies for students with relatively low gelotophobia. However, for those with relatively high gelotophobia, although this theory also predicted greater perceived value in confronting challenges, it was unrelated to challenge-confronting tendencies. Thus, endorsing an incremental theory is helpful but insufficient in motivating high gelotophobia students to exhibit stronger challenge-confronting tendencies.

Keywords

Implicit theories of intelligence Incremental theory Entity theory Gelotophobia Challenge-confronting tendencies 

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, I., Smits, D. J. M., Claes, L., Vandereycken, W., & Bijttebier, P. (2009). Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral inhibition/behavioral activation system scales and the sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire in a sample of eating disordered patients. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 407–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boggiano, A. K., Main, D. S., & Katz, P. A. (1988). Children’s preference for challenge: The role of perceived competence and control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 134–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carretero-Dios, H., Ruch, W., Agudelo, D., Platt, T., & Proyer, R. T. (2010). Fear of being laughed at and social anxiety: A preliminary psychometric study. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 108–124.Google Scholar
  8. Chan, Y. C., Chen, H. C., & Lavallee, J. P. (2013). The impact of gelotophobia, gelotophilia and katagelasticism on creativity. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 26, 609–628.Google Scholar
  9. Cianci, A. M., Klein, H. J., & Seijts, G. H. (2010). The effect of negative feedback on tension and subsequent performance: The main and interactive effects of goal content and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 618–630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coplan, R. J., Wilson, J., Frohlick, S. L., & Zelenski, J. (2006). A person-oriented analysis of behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation in children. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 917–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  12. Cury, F., Da Fonseca, D., Zahn, I., & Elliot, A. (2008). Implicit theories and IQ test performance: A sequential mediational analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 783–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 322–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dweck, C. S., & Master, A. (2009). Self-theories and motivation: Student’s beliefs about intelligence. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 123–140). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edwards, K., Martin, R. A., & Dozois, D. J. A. (2010). The fear of being laughed at, social anxiety, and memories of being teased during childhood. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 94–107.Google Scholar
  18. El-Alayli, A., & Baumgardner, A. (2003). If at first you don’t succeed, what makes you try, try again? Effects of implicit theories and ability feedback in a performance-oriented climate. Self and Identity, 2, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2005). A motivational approach to reasoning, resilience, and responsibility. In R. Stemberg & R. Subotnick (Eds.), Optimizing student success in school reasoning, resilience, and responsibility with the other three R’s (pp. 39–56). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541–553.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gray, J. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Helmreich, R. L., & Spence, J. T. (1978). Achievement motivation and scientific attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 222–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hong, Y. Y., Chiu, C. Y., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M. S., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim, Y. H., Chiu, C. Y., & Zou, Z. (2010). Know thyself: Misperceptions of actual performance undermine achievement motivation, future performance, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 395–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. King, R. B. (2012). How you think about your intelligence influences how adjusted you are: Implicit theories and adjustment outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 705–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kornilova, T. V., Kornilov, S. A., & Chumakova, M. A. (2009). Subjective evaluations of intelligence and academic self-concept predict academic achievement: Evidence from a selective student population. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 596–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 184–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu, C. H. (2012). Valuable but threatening: The reduced effect of incremental theory on challenge-confronting tendencies for students who fear being laughed at. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 839–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852–863.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Niiya, Y., Crocker, J., & Bartmess, E. N. (2004). From vulnerability to resilience. Psychological Science, 15, 801–805.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nussbaum, A. D., & Dweck, C. S. (2008). Defensiveness versus remediation: Self-theories and modes of self esteem maintenance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 599–612.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and learning.Google Scholar
  34. Platt, T., & Ruch, W. (2009). The emotions of gelotophobes: Shameful, fearful and joyless? Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22, 91–110.Google Scholar
  35. Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2010). Dispositions towards ridicule and being laughed at: Current research on gelotophobia, gelotophilia, and katagelasticism. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 49–59.Google Scholar
  36. Ross, S. R., Canada, K. E., & Rarsch, M. K. (2002). Self-handicapping and the five factor model of personality: Mediation between neuroticism and conscientiousness. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1173–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ruch, W. (2009). Fearing humor? Gelotophobia: The fear of being laughed at. Introduction and overview. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ruch, W., & Proyer, R. T. (2008). The fear of being laughed at: Individual and group differences in gelotophobia. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 21, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ruch, W., & Proyer, R. T. (2009). Extending the study of gelotophobia: On gelotophiles and katagelasticists. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22, 183–212.Google Scholar
  40. Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., & Popa, D. E. (2008). The fear of being laughed at (gelotophobia) and personality. Anuarul Institutului de Istorie “G. Baritiu” din Cluj-Napoca (Ed.), Series Humanistica (Vol. VI, pp. 53–68). Cluj-Napoca: Romania.Google Scholar
  41. Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, J. L. (2006). The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 183–242). San Diego. CA: Academic press.Google Scholar
  42. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  43. Titze, M. (2009). Gelotophobia: The fear of being laughed at. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22, 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vohs, K. D., Park, J. K., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2013). Self-affirmation can enable goal disengagement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 14–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cheng-Hong Liu
    • 1
  • Fa-Chung Chiu
    • 2
  • Hsueh-Chih Chen
    • 3
  • Ching-Yi Lin
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Teacher EducationNational Tsing Hua University, TaiwanHsinchuTaiwan, Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Psychology and Social WorkNational Defense UniversityTaipeiTaiwan, Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of Educational Psychology and CounselingNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan, Republic of China
  4. 4.Department of Applied PsychologyHsuan Chuang UniversityHsinchuTaiwan, Republic of China

Personalised recommendations