Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 378–400 | Cite as

Forgiveness aversion: developing a motivational state measure of perceived forgiveness risks

  • Ian WilliamsonEmail author
  • Marti Hope Gonzales
  • Sierra Fernandez
  • Allison Williams
Original Paper


Given the demonstrated psychological, physical, and social benefits of forgiveness, it is striking that there are still strong impediments to its attainment. In this paper, we introduce the multi-dimensional construct of forgiveness aversion, an offense-specific motivational state based on perceived forgiveness risks. The construct and our proposed measure (the Forgiveness Aversion Scale) are composed of three related dimensions: unreadiness, self-protection, and face concerns. Unreadiness refers to the ongoing emotional turmoil that keeps victims from sincerely forgiving. Self-protection refers to the concerns about how offenders will interpret forgiveness. Finally, face concerns reflect victims’ concerns for their reputation. Four studies were completed to develop a state measure of forgiveness aversion through correlation, structural equations modeling, longitudinal analysis, and a hypothetical scenario experiment. Results of four studies reveal differential predictors of the three dimensions of forgiveness aversion and demonstrate that our understanding of the forgiveness process and impediments thereto is enhanced by addressing situation-specific impediments to forgiveness.


Forgiveness Motivation Empathy Apology Rumination 


  1. Baskin, T. W., & Enright, R. D. (2004). Intervention studies on forgiveness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling and Development, 82, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1656–1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R. F., Exline, J. J., & Sommer, K. L. (1998). The victim role, grudge theory, and two dimensions of forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological perspectives (pp. 163–192). Radnor, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Wotman, S. R. (1990). Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal conflict: Autobiographical narratives about anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 994–1005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennet, J. B. (1988). Power and influence as distinct personality traits: Development and validation of a psychometric measure. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 361–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry, J. W., Worthington, E. L, Jr, Parrott, L., O’Connor, L. E., & Wade, N. E. (2001). Dispositional forgivingness: Development and construct validity of the Transgression Narrative Test of Forgivingness (TNTF). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1277–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bono, G., McCullough, M. E., & Root, L. M. (2008). Forgiveness, feeling connected to others, and well-being: Two longitudinal studies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 182–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnette, J. L., McCullough, M. E., Van Tongeren, D. R., & Davis, D. E. (2012). Forgiveness results from integrating information about relationship value and exploitation risk. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 345–356. doi: 10.1177/0146167211424582.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analyses for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  11. Eaton, J., Struthers, C. W., & Santelli, A. G. (2006). The mediating role of perceptual validation in the repentance-forgiveness process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1389–1401. doi: 10.1177/0146167206291005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elliot, A. J. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 111–116. doi: 10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Enright, R. D., & Fitzgibbons, R. P. (2000). Helping clients forgive: An empirical guide for resolving anger and restoring hope. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Exline, J. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Expressing forgiveness and repentance: Benefits and barriers. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 133–155). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Exline, J. J., Baumeister, R. F., Bushman, B. J., Campbell, W. K., & Finkel, E. J. (2004). Too proud to let go: Narcissistic entitlement as a barrier to forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 894–912. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.894.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Exline, J. J., Worthington, E. L, Jr, Hill, P., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Forgiveness and justice: A research agenda for social and personality psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 337–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fehr, R., & Gelfand, M. J. (2010). When apologies work: How matching apology components to victims’ self construals facilitates forgiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2002). Forgiveness in marriage: Implications for psychological aggression and constructive communication. Personal Relationships, 9(3), 239–251. doi: 10.1111/1475-6811.00016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R. H., & Davila, J. (2007). Longitudinal relations between forgiveness and conflict resolution in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 542–545. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.3.542.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fincham, F. D., Hall, J., & Beach, S. R. H. (2006). Forgiveness in marriage: Current status and future directions. Family Relations, 55(4), 415–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2005.callf.x-i1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fincham, F. D., Jackson, H., & Beach, S. R. H. (2005). Transgression severity and forgiveness: Different moderators for objective and subjective severity. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(6), 860–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fiske, S. T. (2003). Five core social motives, plus or minus five. In S. J. Spencer, S. Fein, M. P. Zanna, & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Motivated social perception: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 9, pp. 233–246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Fiske, S. T. (2008). Core social motivations: Views from the couch, consciousness, classroom, computers, and collectives. In J. Y. Shah & W. L. Gardener (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fiske, S. T., & Yamamoto, M. (2005). Coping with rejection: Core social motives across cultures. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 185–198). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  25. Freedman, S. R., & Enright, R. D. (1996). Forgiveness as an intervention goal with incest survivors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 983–992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  27. Hardin, C. D., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 28–84)., The interpersonal context New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  28. Hayes, S. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. City, State: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  29. Horowitz, M. J., Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (1979). Impact of Event Scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 209–218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. John, O. P., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 339–369). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1, pp. 231–262). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Karremans, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2010). Having the power to forgive: when the experience of power increases interpersonal forgiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1010–1023. doi: 10.1177/0146167210376761.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Karremans, J. C., & Van Lange, P. M. (2004). Back to caring after being hurt: the role of forgiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 207–227. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Karremans, J. C., Van Lange, P. M., Ouwerkerk, J. W., & Kluwer, E. S. (2003). When forgiving enhances psychological well-being: The role of interpersonal commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1011–1026. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kluwer, E. S., & Karremans, J. C. (2009). Unforgiving motivations following infidelity: Should we make peace with our past? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 1298–1325. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2009.28.10.1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lamb, S., & Murphy, J. G. (Eds.). (2002). Before forgiving: Cautionary views of forgiveness in psychotherapy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lawler, K. A., Younger, J. W., Piferi, R. L., Billington, E., Jobe, R., Edmondson, K., et al. (2003). A change of heart: cardiovascular correlates of forgiveness in response to interpersonal conflict. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 26(5), 373–393.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee, S., Quigley, B. M., Nesler, M. S., Corbett, A. B., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1999). Development of a self-presentation tactics scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 701–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Luchies, L. B., Finkel, E. J., McNulty, J. K., & Kumashiro, M. (2010). The doormat effect: when forgiving erodes self-respect and self-concept clarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 734–749. doi: 10.1037/a0017838.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maio, G. R., Thomas, G., Fincham, F. D., & Carnelley, K. B. (2008). Unraveling the role of forgiveness in family relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 307–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McCullough, M. E. (2008). Beyond revenge: The evolution of the forgiveness instinct. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  42. McCullough, M. E., Bono, G., & Root, L. M. (2007). Rumination, emotion, and forgiveness: Three longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 490–505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McCullough, M. E., Fincham, F. D., & Tsang, J. (2003). Forgiveness, forbearance, and time: The temporal unfolding of transgression-related interpersonal motivations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 540–557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McCullough, M. E., & Hoyt, W. T. (2002). Transgression-related motivational dispositions: Personality substrates of forgiveness and their links to the Big Five. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1556–1573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586–1603.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McNulty, J. (2010). Forgiveness increases the likelihood of subsequent partner transgressions in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 90, 787–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McNulty, J. K. (2011). The dark side of forgiveness: the tendency to forgive predicts continued psychological and physical aggression in marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 770–783. doi: 10.1177/0146167211407077.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Paleari, F. G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. (2005). Marital quality, forgiveness, empathy, and rumination: A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 368–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rapske, D. L., Boon, S. D., Alibhai, A. M., & Kheong, M. J. (2010). Not forgiven, not forgotten: An investigation of unforgiven interpersonal offenses. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 1100–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schnelle, J., Brandstätter, V., & Knöpfel, A. (2010). The adoption of approach versus avoidance goals: The role of goal-relevant resources. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 215–229. doi: 10.1007/s11031-010-9173-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  53. Stillwell, A. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1997). The construction of victim and perpetrator memories: Accuracy and distortion in role-based accounts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1157–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stuckless, N., & Goranson, R. (1992). The vengeance scale: Development of a measure of attitudes toward revenge. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 25–42.Google Scholar
  55. Subkoviak, M. J., Enright, R. D., Wu, C., Gassin, E. A., Freedman, S., Olson, L. M., et al. (1995). Measuring interpersonal forgiveness in late adolescence and middle adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 641–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Veenstra, G. (1992). Psychological concepts of forgiveness. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 11, 160–169.Google Scholar
  57. Wade, N. G., Bailey, D. C., & Shaffer, P. (2005). Helping clients heal: Does forgiveness make a difference? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 634–641. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.36.6.634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wade, N. G., Johnson, C. V., & Meyer, J. E. (2008). Understanding concerns about interventions to promote forgiveness: A review of the literature. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 45, 88–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wade, N. G., & Worthington, E. L, Jr. (2005). In search of a common core: A content analysis of interventions to promote forgiveness. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42, 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weiner, B., Graham, S., Peter, O., & Zmuidinas, M. (1991). Public confession and forgiveness. Journal of Personality, 59, 281–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Williamson, I., & Gonzales, M. H. (2007). The subjective experience of forgiveness: positive construals of the forgiveness experience. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 407–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Witvliet, C. V. O., Ludwig, T. E., & Vander Laan, K. L. (2001). Granting forgiveness or harboring grudges: Implications for emotion, physiology, and health. Psychological Science, 121, 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wohl, M. J., & McGrath, A. L. (2007). The perception of time heals all wounds: temporal distance affects willingness to forgive following an interpersonal transgression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1023–1035. doi: 10.1177/0146167207301021.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Worthington, E. L, Jr, & Scherer, M. (2004). Forgiveness is an emotion-focused coping strategy that can reduce health risks and promote health resilience: Theory, review, and hypotheses. Psychology and Health, 19, 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Worthington, E. L, Jr, & Wade, N. G. (1999). The psychology of unforgiveness and forgiveness and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 385–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wrightsman, L. S, Jr. (1964). Measurement of philosophies of human nature. Psychological Reports, 14, 743–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian Williamson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marti Hope Gonzales
    • 2
  • Sierra Fernandez
    • 1
  • Allison Williams
    • 2
  1. 1.New Mexico Highlands UniversityLas VegasUSA
  2. 2.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations