Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 79–92 | Cite as

Correlates of parental control and autonomy support in an interdependent culture: A look at Ghana

  • Kristine N. Marbell
  • Wendy S. Grolnick
Original Paper

Abstract

It is unclear whether, similar to research findings in Western societies, autonomy support is associated with positive child outcomes, and forceful control with negative outcomes in collectivist societies. A two-part study (N = 190 Ghanaian sixth graders) examined the relations of parental structure, control, and autonomy support in Ghana with child outcomes, and whether autonomy support was at odds with Ghanaian children’s values of interdependence and respect for elders. Results showed that structure was related to cognitive perceived competence, parental control was related to controlled regulation around school work and decreased academic engagement, and autonomy support was negatively related to depression and positively related to autonomous forms of motivation, engagement in school, and interestingly, children’s endorsement of collectivist cultural values. The importance of distinguishing between parental control and provision of structure, and the implication of the findings for understanding the role of parental autonomy support in diverse cultures, are discussed.

Keywords

Parental control Autonomy support Culture Collectivist culture Self-determination theory 

References

  1. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barber, B. K. (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67, 3296–3319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber, B., Stoltz, H., & Olsen, J. (2005). Parental support, psychological control, and behavioral control: Assessing relevance across time, method, and culture. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 70(4), 1–137.Google Scholar
  4. Block, J. H. (1980). The child-rearing practices report (CRPR): A set of Q items for the description of parental socialization attitudes and values. Berkeley: Institute of Human Development, University of California.Google Scholar
  5. Chao, R. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65, 1111–1119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chao, R. (2001). Extending research on the consequences of parenting style for Chinese Americans and European Americans. Child Development, 72(6), 1832–1843.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chirkov, V. I. (2007). Culture, personal autonomy and individualism: their relationships and implications for personal growth and well-being. In G. Zheng, K. Leung, & J. G. Adair (Eds.), Perspectives and progress in contemporary cross-cultural psychology (pp. 247–263). Beijing, China: China Light Industry Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chirkov, V. I., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Parent and teacher autonomy-support in Russian and U.S. adolescents: Common effects on well-being and academic motivation. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 32, 618–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chirkov, V. I., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 97–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chirkov, V. I., Ryan, R. M., & Willness, C. (2005). Cultural context and psychological needs in Canada and Brazil: Testing a self-determination approach to the internalization of cultural practices, identity, and well-being. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Danquah, F., & Miller, S. K. (2007). Cocoa farming in Ghana: Emic experience, etic interpretation. Southern Rural Sociology, 22(1), 65–798.Google Scholar
  13. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  14. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024–1037.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dornbusch, S. M., Ritter, P. L., Mont-Reynaud, R., & Chen, Z. (1990). Family decision-making and academic performance in a diverse high school population. Journal of Adolescent Research, 5, 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Downie, M., Chua, S. N., Koestner, R., Barrios, M., Rip, B., & M’Birkou, S. (2007). The relations of parental autonomy support to cultural internalization and well-being of immigrants and sojourners. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13, 241–249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dwairy, M., Achoui, M., Abouserie, R., & Farah, A. (2006). Parenting styles, individuation and mental health of Arab adolescents: A third cross-regional research study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(3), 1–11.Google Scholar
  18. Eapen, V., Naqvi, A., & Al-Dhaheri, A. S. (2000). Cross-cultural validation of Harter’s self-perception profile for children in the United Arab Emirates. Annals of Saudi Medicine, 20(1), 8–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Entwistle, D. R., & Astone, N. M. (1994). Some practical guidelines for measuring youth race/ethnicity and socio-economic status. Child Development, 65, 1521–1540.Google Scholar
  20. Farkas, M. S., & Grolnick, W. S. (2010). Examining the components and concomitants of parental structure in the academic domain. Motivation and Emotion, 34(3), 266–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fletcher, A. C., Steinberg, L., & Williams, M. (2004). Parental influences on adolescent problem behavior: Revisiting Stattin and Kerr. Child Development, 75, 781–796.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuligni, A. J., Tseng, V., & Lam, M. (1999). Attitudes toward family obligations among. American adolescents from Asian, Latin American, and European backgrounds. Child Development, 70, 1030–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hofstede, G. Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software for the mind. Third Edition, revised and expanded, New York: McGraw-Hill, USA.Google Scholar
  24. Ghana Ministry of Education (2009). Preliminary Education Sector Performance Report.Google Scholar
  25. Ghana Statistical Service. (2006). Tourism market trends in Ghana. Retrieved January 10, 2012, from http://www.statsghana.gov.gh/TOURISM_MARKET_TRENDS_IN_%20GHANA _ 2006.html.
  26. Graham, J. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–5769.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grolnick, W. S. (2003). The psychology of parental control: How well-meant parenting backfires. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  28. Grolnick, W. S., Farkas, M. S., Sohmer, R., Michaels, S., & Valsiner, J. (2007a). Facilitating motivation in young adolescents: Effects of an after-school program. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28, 332–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grolnick, W. S., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2009). Issues and challenges in studying parental control: Toward a new conceptualization. Child Development Perspectives, 3(3), 165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grolnick, W. S., Price, C. E., Beiswenger, K. L., & Sauck, C. C. (2007b). Evaluative pressure in parents: Effects of situation, maternal, and child characteristics on autonomy-supportive versus controlling behavior. Developmental Psychology, 43, 991–1002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grolnick, W. S., Raftery, J. N., Marbell-Pierre, K., Flamm, E. S., Cardemil, E. V., & Sanchez, M. (2012). Parental provision of structure: Implementation, correlates, and outcomes in three domains. Unpublished Manuscript, Clark University.Google Scholar
  32. Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Parent styles associated with children’s self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grolnick, W. S., & Wellborn, J. S. (1988, April). Parent influences on children’s engagement and disaffection in school. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  34. Gyekye, K. (1996). African cultural values: An introduction. Accra: Sankofa Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hayamizu, T. (1997). Between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Examination of reasons for academic study based on the theory of internalization. Japanese Psychological Research, 39(2), 98–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hofstede, G. (1983). Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions. In J. Deregowski, S. Dzirawiec, & R. Annis (Eds.), Explications in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 389–407). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  38. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  39. Iyengar, S. S., & DeVoe, S. E. (2003). Rethinking the value of choice: Considering cultural mediators of intrinsic motivation. In V. Murphy-Berman & J. Berman (Eds.), Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self (pp. 129–174). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  40. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349–366.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kagitcibasi, C. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 403–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kim, A. (2004). Investigating self-regulation in Korean students. Paper presented at the second international conference on self-determination theory. Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  43. Koestner, R., Ryan, R. M., Bernieri, F., & Holt, K. (1984). Setting limits on children’s behavior: The differential effects of controlling versus informational styles on intrinsic motivation and creativity. Journal of Personality, 52(23), 1–248.Google Scholar
  44. Kovacs, M. (1992). Children’s depression inventory (CDI). New York: Multi-health Systems, Inc.Google Scholar
  45. Leung, K., Lau, S., & Lam, W. L. (1998). Parenting styles and achievement: A cross-cultural study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 44, 157–172.Google Scholar
  46. Levesque, C., Zuehlke, A. N., Stanek, L. R., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Autonomy and competence in German and American university students: A comparative study based on self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lin, C. (2010). The effect of teacher support on basic needs and learning engagement in Taiwanese high school context. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, National Chengchi University.Google Scholar
  48. Makris-Botsaris, E., & Robinson, W. P. (1991). Harter’s self-perception profile for children: A cross cultural validation in Greece. Evaluation and Research in Education, 5(3), 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McGadney-Douglass, B. F., & Douglass, R. L. (2008). Collective familial decision-making in times of trouble: Intergenerational solidarity in Ghana. Journal of Cross Cultural Gentology, 23, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McPartland, J. M., & Epstein, J. L. (1977). Open schools and achievement: Extended tests of a finding of no relationship. Sociology of Education, 50, 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Molina, C. S., Gómez, J. R., & Pastrana, M. C. (2009). Psychometric properties of the Spanish-language child depression inventory with hispanic children who are secondary victims of domestic violence. Adolescence, 44(173), 133–148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivitism: Evaluations of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pomerantz, E. M., & Eaton, M. M. (2001). Maternal intrusive support in the academic context: Transactional socialization processes. Developmental Psychology, 37, 174–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106, 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Robbins, R. J. (1994). An assessment of perceptions of parental autonomy support and control: Child and parent correlates. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  57. Rohner, R. P., & Pettengill, S. M. (1985). Perceived parental acceptance-rejection and parental control among Korean adolescents. Child Development, 56(2), 524–528.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ryan, R., & Connell, J. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74, 1557–1586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Saavedra, J. M. (1980). Effects of perceived parental warmth and control on the self-evaluation of Puerto Rican adolescent males. Behavior Science Research, 15, 41–54.Google Scholar
  62. Salm, S., & Falola, T. (2002). Culture and customs of Ghana. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  63. Schaefer, E. S. (1965). Children’s reports of parental behavior: An inventory. Child Development, 36, 413–424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In U. Kim, H. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85–122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  65. Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5, 136–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. G. (1987). Culture and moral development. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1–83). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  67. Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Regan, C. (1986). The parents as social context questionnaire (PASCQ): Parent and child-reports of parent involvement, structure, and autonomy support. (Tech Rep.). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  69. Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Beyers, W., et al. (2007). Conceptualizing parental autonomy support: Adolescent perceptions of promoting independence versus promoting volitional functioning. Developmental Psychology, 43, 633–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Spence, S.H. & Milne, J. (1987). The Children's Depression Inventory: Norms and factor analysis from an australian school. Australian Psychologist, 22(3), 345–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., Dornbusch, S. M., & Darling, N. (1992). Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: Authoritative parenting, school improvement and encouragement to succeed. Child Development, 60, 521–538.Google Scholar
  72. Tanaka, K., & Yamauchi, H. (2000). Influence of autonomy on perceived control beliefs and self-regulated learning in Japanese undergraduate students. North American Journal of Psychology, 2, 255–272.Google Scholar
  73. Traube, D., Dukay, V., Kaaya, S., Reyes, H., & Mellins, C. (2010). Cross-cultural adaptation of the child depression inventory for use in Tanzania with children affected by HIV. Vulnerable Child Youth Studies, 5(2), 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Van de Vijver, F. (2001). The evolution of cross-cultural research methods. In D. Matsumoto (Ed.), The handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 77–97). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Van Dongen-Melman, J. E., Koot, H. M., & Verhulst, F. C. (1993). Cross-cultural validation of harter’s self-perception profile for children in a Dutch sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 739–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: the synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246–260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W., & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 468–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wang, Q., Pomerantz, E. M., & Chen, H. (2007). The role of parents’ control in early adolescents’ psychological functioning: A longitudinal investigation in the United States and China. Child Development, 78, 1592–1610.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Engaged versus disaffected action: Conceptualization and measurement of motivation in the academic domain. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
  80. World Bank. (2010). Infrastructure. Retrieved April 6, 2010, from http://search.worldbank.org/ data?qterm = percentage + of + internet + users&language = EN&format = html.
  81. Yamauchi, H., & Tanaka, K. (1998). Relations of autonomy, self-referenced beliefs and self-regulated learning among Japanese children. Psychological Reports, 82, 803–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zhou, M., Ma, W. J., & Deci, E. L. (2009). The importance of autonomy for rural Chinese children’s motivation for learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 492–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zuckerman, M., Porac, J., Lathin, D., Smith, R., & Deci, E. L. (1978). On the importance of self-determination for intrinsically motivated behaviour. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 443–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyClark UniversityWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations