Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 287–300 | Cite as

Committing to implementation intentions: Attention and memory effects for selected situational cues

  • Anja Achtziger
  • Ute C. Bayer
  • Peter M. Gollwitzer
Original Paper

Abstract

Two studies tested whether forming implementation intentions (Gollwitzer, Am Psychol 54:493–503 in 1999) results in a heightened activation of specified situational cues. Going beyond prior studies, participants of the present studies specified these opportunities on their own (i.e., the action cues were not assigned by the experimenter), and activation level was assessed by attraction of attention and recall performance rather than lexical decisions. In Study 1, situational cues associated with the where and when to act on an everyday life goal attracted more attention than non-specified cues when presented to the non-attended channel in a dichotic listening task. In Study 2, the recall of specified cues was better than that of non-specified cues both 15 min after forming implementation intentions and after a delay of 2 days. Importantly, goal commitment and implementation intention commitment moderated this effect.

Keywords

Intentions Goals Implementation intentions Cognitive accessibility Commitment 

References

  1. Aarts, H., Dijksterhuis, A., & Midden, C. (1999). To plan or not to plan? Goal achievement or interrupting the performance of mundane behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 971–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Achtziger, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2010). Motivation and volition in the course of action. In J. Heckhausen & H. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Achtziger, A., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2008). Implementation intentions and shielding goal striving from unwanted thoughts and feelings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 381–393.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Badets, A., Blandin, Y., & Bouquet, C. A. (2006). The intention superiority effect in motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 491–505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bayer, U. C., Achtziger, A., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Moskowitz, G. (2009). Responding to subliminal cues: Do if-then plans cause action preparation and initiation without conscious intent? Social Cognition, 27, 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayer, U. C., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Achtziger, A. (2010). Staying on track: Planned goal striving is protected from disruptive internal states. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 505–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brandstätter, V., Lengfelder, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2001). Implementation intentions and efficient action initiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 946–960.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Broadbent, D. E. (1954). The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 191–196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryden, M. P. (1988). An overview of the dichotic listening procedure and its relation to cerebral organization. In K. Hughdahl (Ed.), Handbook of dichotic listening: Theory, methods, and research (pp. 1–43). Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cherry, E. C., & Taylor, W. K. (1954). Some further experiments upon the recognition of speech with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 554–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, A.-L., Bayer, U. C., Jaudas, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). Self-regulatory strategy and executive control: Implementation intentions modulate task switching and Simon task performance. Psychological Research, 72, 12–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dawson, M. E., & Schell, A. M. (1982). Electrodermal responses to attended and nonattended significant stimuli during dichotic listening. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 315–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dockree, P. M., & Ellis, J. A. (2001). Forming and cancelling everyday intentions: Implications for prospective remembering. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1139–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Düker, H. (1953). Konzentrations-Leistungs-Test K-L-T. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  17. Erickson, B. A., & Erickson, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). Accessibility from active and fulfilled goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 220–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gadea, M., Espert, R., & Chirivella, J. (1997). Dichotic listening: Elimination of the right ear advantage under dual task procedure. Applied Neuropsychology, 4, 117–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1993). Goal achievement: The role of intentions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 141–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Brandstätter, V. (1997). Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 186–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gollwitzer, P. M., Gawrilow, C., & Oettingen, G. (2010). The power of planning: Self-control by effective goal-striving. In R. R. Hassin, K. N. Ochsner, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Self control in society, mind, and brain (pp. 279–296). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. (1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1211–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hicks, J., Marsh, R. L., & Russel, E. J. (2000). The properties of retention intervals and their affect on retaining prospective memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1160–1169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kazén, M., Kaschel, R., & Kuhl, J. (2008). Individual differences in intention initiation under demanding conditions: Interactive effects of state vs. action orientation and enactment difficulty. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 693–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koriat, A., Ben-Zur, H., & Nussbaum, A. (1990). Encoding information for future action: Memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for to-be-recalled tasks. Memory & Cognition, 18, 568–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuhl, J., & Goschke, T. (1994). State orientation and the activation and retrieval of intentions from memory. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp. 127–154). Göttingen/Toronto: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  30. Lewis, J. L. (1970). Semantic processing of unattended messages using dichotic listening. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85, 225–228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marsh, R. L., Cook, G. I., Meeks, J. T., Clark-Foos, A., & Hicks, J. L. (2007). Memory for intention-related material presented in a to-be-ignored channel. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1197–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Bink, M. L. (1998). Activation of completed, uncompleted, and partially completed intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 350–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Bryan, E. S. (1999). The activation of unrelated and cancelled intentions. Memory & Cognition, 27, 320–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maylor, E. A., Darby, R. J., & Della Sala, S. (2000). Retrieval of performed versus to-be-performed tasks: A naturalistic study of the intention-superiority effect in normal aging and dementia. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 56–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moskowitz, G. B., Li, P., & Kirk, E. R. (2004). The implicit volition model: On the preconscious regulation of temporarily adopted goals. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 317–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nielson, S. L., & Sarason, I. G. (1981). Emotion, personality and selective attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 945–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parks-Stamm, E. J., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2007). Action control by implementation intentions: Effective cue detection and efficient response initiation. Social Cognition, 25, 248–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Penningroth, S. (2005). Free recall of everyday retrospective and prospective memories: The intention-superiority effect is moderated by action versus state orientation and by gender. Memory, 13, 711–724.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ruoff, A. (1981). Häufigkeitswörterbuch gesprochener Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  42. Sætrevik, B., & Hugdahl, K. (2007). Endogenous and exogenous control of attention in dichotic listening. Neuropsychology, 21, 285–290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (1999). Implementation intention and repeated behaviour: Augmenting the predictive validity of the theory of planned behaviour. European Journal of Psychology, 29, 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sheeran, P., Webb, T. L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2005). The interplay between goal intentions and implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 87–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith, R. E. (2010). What costs do reveal, moving beyond the cost debate: Reply to Einstein, McDaniel. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 756–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Spranger, T., Schatz, T. R., & Knopf, M. (2008). Does action make you faster? A retrieval-based approach to investigating the origins of the enactment effect. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 487–495.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Treisman, A. (1960). Contextual cues in selective listening. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 242–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Treisman, A. (1974). Semantic processing in dichotic listening? A replication. Memory & Cognition, 2, 641–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vogt, J., De Houwer, J., Moors, A., van Damme, S., & Crombez, G. (2010). The automatic orienting of attention to goal-relevant stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 134, 61–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2004). Identifying good opportunities to act: Implementation intentions and cue discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 407–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). How do implementation intentions promote goal attainment? A test of component processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 132, 249–268.Google Scholar
  52. Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2008). Mechanisms of implementation intention effects: The role of goal intentions, self-efficacy, and accessibility of plan components. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 373–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wieber, F., & Sassenberg, K. (2006). I can’t take my eyes off of it: Attention attraction effects of implementation intentions. Social Cognition, 24(6), 723–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wixted, J. (1992). Subjective memorability and the mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(4), 681–690.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anja Achtziger
    • 1
  • Ute C. Bayer
    • 2
  • Peter M. Gollwitzer
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Communication and Cultural ManagementZeppelin UniversityFriedrichshafenGermany
  2. 2.FB PsychologieUniversität KonstanzConstanceGermany
  3. 3.New York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations