Composition and consistency of the desired affective state: The role of personality and motivation
- 567 Downloads
Using longitudinal and experience sampling designs, the consistency and composition, and personality and motivational predictors, of the desired affective state are explored. Findings indicate that, while the desired affect is relatively malleable throughout one semester, it is relatively stable throughout 1 week. Personality and motivations/goals were related to the content of the desired affective state. Extraversion, neuroticism, agreeableness, and conscientiousness were related to the content of the desired affective state. In addition, higher-order goals predicted the content of the desired affective state. Our results suggest that the content of the desired affective state may be largely dependent on personality, motivation, and, potentially, an interaction between personality and motivation.
KeywordsDesired affect Ideal affect Big 5 Motivation Goals
The authors would like to thank Jessica Bunn, Heather Grogan, the Axio survey system team at Kansas State University, and the AskWU survey system team at Washington University in St. Louis for their assistance with data collection.
- Bonanno, G. A. (2001). Emotion self-regulation. In G. A. Bonanno & T. J. Mayne (Eds.), Emotions: Current issues and future directions (pp. 251–285). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The big five inventory—Versions 4a and 54 (technical report). Berkeley, CA: Institute of Personality Assessment and Research.Google Scholar
- Larsen, R. J., & Augustine, A. A. (2008). Basic personality dispositions: Extraversion/neuroticism, BAS/BIS, positive/negative affectivity, and approach/avoidance. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 151–164). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.Google Scholar
- Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1992). Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 25–59.Google Scholar
- Larsen, R. J., & Prizmic, Z. (2004). Affect regulation. In R. Baumeister & K. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation research (pp. 40–60). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Shulman, T. E., Augustine, A. A., & Hemenover, S. H. (2006). Studies in affect regulation: Linking affective chronometry and repair ability. In A. V. Clark (Ed.), Psychology of moods: New research (pp. 117–142). Hauppauge: Nova.Google Scholar