When the victim is one among others: Empathy, awareness of others and motivational ambivalence
- 295 Downloads
Feeling empathy for one person in need while being aware of others may increase the motivational ambivalence between the motive of helping the one and the motive of helping the others, and such motivational ambivalence may reduce the helping directed to the person in need. To test these hypotheses we carried out three studies in which participants were faced with a real case of a child in need. In Study 1, empathy, awareness of others and motivational ambivalence were allowed to occur naturally and subsequently measured. In Study 2, empathy and awareness of others were experimentally manipulated, and motivational ambivalence measured. In Study 3, we tested how empathy and motivational ambivalence influenced an actual helping decision. Taken together, the results supported our two hypotheses. The present research offers insight into processes not previously considered in the research, but which may influence decisions about assistance to others in need.
KeywordsEmpathy Awareness of others Motivational ambivalence Prosocial behavior
This research was supported by PSI2008-04849 (Spanish Ministry of Education and Science). The authors extend their gratitude to Pilar Carrera, Eric Stocks and two reviewers for their helpful comments on a first version of this article, Carlos Oceja for his assistance in editing the stimuli used in Study 2, and Susana Sariego and David Weston for their work in the preparation of the English version.
- Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. A. (2006). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Jonas, K., Broemer, P., & Diehl, M. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology, Vol. 11 (pp. 35–74). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Oceja, L., & Jiménez, I. (2007). Beyond egoism and group identity: Empathy toward the other and awareness of others in a social dilemma. The Spanish Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 369–379.Google Scholar
- Oceja, L., Stocks, E., Ambrona, T., López-Pérez, B., Salgado, S., & Villegas, M. (2010). When the individual is one among others: Moderating the threat to the collective good produced by empathy-induced altruism. Under review.Google Scholar
- Oceja, L., Stocks, E., & Lishner, D. (in press). Congruence between the target in need and the recipient of aid: The one-among-others effect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. Accepted for publication.Google Scholar
- Schelling, T. C. (1968). The life you save may be your own. In S. Chase (Ed.), Problems in public expenditure analysis. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
- Slovic, P. (2007). If I look at the mass I will never act: Psychic numbing and genocide. Judgment and Decision Making, 2, 79–95.Google Scholar
- Slovic, S., & Slovic, P. (2004). Numbers and nerves: Toward an affective apprehension of environmental risk. Whole Terrain, 13, 14–18.Google Scholar
- Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about attitudinal ambivalence. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedent and consequences (pp. 361–386). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar