Motivation and Emotion

, 33:261 | Cite as

The surprising effect of partner flaws and qualities on romantic affect

  • Anca M. Miron
  • David Knepfel
  • Sarah K. Parkinson
Original Paper


We examined whether the intensity of romantic affect is a function of deterrence to that affect (i.e., a reason for not feeling the affect) and explored the effect of deterrents that are relevant to the stimulus instigating the emotion. In line with the Emotional Intensity Theory, we found that positive affect toward the romantic partner was reduced by a minor salient partner flaw, was maintained intense by a moderately important flaw, and was reduced by a very important partner flaw. Study 2 replicated the results of Study 1. In Study 3, romantic negative affect in the form of anger at the romantic partner was a nonmonotonic function of the importance of a salient positive partner characteristic. Anger was reduced by a minor partner quality, was maintained intense by a moderately important quality, and was reduced by a very important partner quality. Theoretical and practical implications for romantic relationships are discussed.


Emotional intensity Romantic affect Deterrence Love Anger 



We thank Christina Romo, Abbie Gilmore, Stephanie Cornwell, and Patricia Wood, who assisted with data collection. We especially thank Jack Brehm for the fruitful discussions that led to the development of this research and to Jack Brehm, Mark Ferguson, and David Lishner for their comments on an earlier draft. This paper is dedicated to the memory of Jack Brehm, the first author’s mentor, who passed away on August 9, 2009.


  1. Aronson, E., Willerman, B., & Floyd, J. (1966). The effect of a pratfall on increasing interpersonal attractiveness. Psychonomic Science, 4, 227–228.Google Scholar
  2. Baron, R. A. (1988). Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 199–207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, P. A., & Baron, R. A. (1974). Environmental influences on attraction: Effects of heat, attitude similarity, and personal evaluations. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 479–481.Google Scholar
  4. Brehm, S. S. (1988). Passionate love. In R. J. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 232–263). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brehm, J. W. (1999). The intensity of emotion. Personality and Social Psychological Review, 3(1), 2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brehm, J. W., Brummett, B. H., & Harvey, L. (1999). Paradoxical sadness. Motivation and Emotion, 23, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brehm, J. W., & Miron, A. M. (2006). Can the simultaneous experience of opposing emotions really occur? Motivation and Emotion, 30, 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brehm, J. W., Miron, A. M., & Miller, K. (2009). Affect as a motivational state. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 1069–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. A. (1989). The intensity of motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 109–131.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Buss, D. M. (1989). Conflict between the sexes: Strategic interference and the evocation of anger and upset. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 735–747.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 839–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cacioppo, J. T., Larsen, J. T., Smith, N. K., & Berntson, G. G. (2004). The affect system: What lurks below the surface of feelings? In A. S. R. Manstead, N. H. Frijda, & A. H. Fischer (Eds.), Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam conference. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cohan, C. L., & Bradbury, T. N. (1997). Negative life events, marital interaction, and the longitudinal course of newlywed marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 114–128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental interference and romantic love: The Romeo and Juliet effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 1–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dutton, D. G., & Painter, S. L. (1993). Emotional attachments in abusive relationships: A test of traumatic bonding theory. Violence and Victims, 8, 105–120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Follingstad, D. R., Rutledge, L. L., Polek, D. S., & McNeill-Hawkins, K. (1988). Factors associated with patterns of dating violence toward college women. Journal of Family Violence, 3, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gendolla, G. H. E., & Wright, R. A. (2005). Motivation in social settings: Studies of effort-related cardiovascular arousal. In J. P. Forgas, K. Williams, & B. von Hippel (Eds.), Social motivation: Conscious and nonconscious processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gongaza, G. C., Keltner, D., Londahl, E. A., & Smith, M. D. (2001). Love and commitment problem in romantic relations and friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 221–233.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffit, W., & Veitch, R. (1971). Hot and crowded: Influences of population density and temperature on interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hadden, S. C., & Hojjat, M. (2006). Aggressive responses to betrayal: Type of relationship, victim’s sex, and nature of aggression. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaption. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Levinger, G. (1999). Duty toward whom? Reconsidering attractions and barriers as determinants of commitment in a relationship. In W. H. Jones & J. M. Adams (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (pp. 37–52). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  25. Miron, A. M., & Brehm, J. W. (2009). The theory of emotional intensity and its cardiovascular implications for emotional states. In R. A. Wright & G. H. E. Gendolla (Eds.), Motivation perspectives on cardiovascular response, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  26. Miron, A. M., Brummett, B. H., Ruggles, R., & Brehm, J. W. (2008). Deterring anger and anger-motivated behaviors. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 326–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miron, A. M., Parkinson, S. K., & Brehm, J. W. (2007). Does happiness have a motivational function? Cognition and Emotion, 21, 248–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morgan, H. J., & Shaver, P. R. (1999). Attachment processes and commitment to romantic relationships. In J. M. Adams & W. H. Jones (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (pp. 109–124). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Mueller, C., & Donnerstein, E. (1977). The effects of humor-induced arousal upon aggressive behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (1993). Seeing virtues in faults: Negativity and the transformation of interpersonal narratives in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 707–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. C., & Griffin, D. W. (1996a). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. C., & Griffin, D. W. (1996b). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155–1180.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2003). The dynamic structure of relationship perceptions: Differential importance as a strategy of relationship maintenance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1433–1446.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2004). How does context affect intimate relationships? Linking external stress and cognitive processes within marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 134–148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pelham, B. W., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (1989). From self-conceptions to self-worth: On the sources and structure of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 672–680.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Pennebaker, J. W., Dyer, M. A., Caulkins, R. S., Litowitz, D. L., Ackreman, P. L., & McGraw, K. M. (1979). Don’t the girls get prettier at closing time: A country and western application to psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 122–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roberson, B. F., & Wright, R. A. (1994). Difficulty as a determinant of interpersonal appeal: A social-motivational application of energization theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 373–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rotton, J., Barry, T., Frey, J., & Soler, E. (1978). Air pollution and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rusbult, C. E., & Martz, J. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 558–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ruvolo, A. P., & Veroff, J. (1997). For better or for worse: Real-ideal discrepancies and the marital well-being of newlyweds. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shortell, J., Epstein, S., & Taylor, S. P. (1970). Instigation to aggression as a function of degree of defeat and the capacity for massive retaliation. Journal of Personality, 38, 313–328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Showers, C. J., & Kevlyn, S. B. (1999). Organization of knowledge about a relationship partner: Implications for liking and loving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 958–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Silvia, P. J., & Brehm, J. W. (2001). Exploring alternative deterrents to emotional intensity: Anticipated happiness, distraction, and sadness. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 575–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sternberg, R. J., & Barnes, M. L. (1985). Real and ideal others in romantic relationships: Is four a crowd? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1586–1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tamir, M. (2009). What do people want to feel and why? Pleasure and utility in emotion regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tesser, A., & Beach, S. R. H. (1998). Life event, relationship quality, and depression: An investigation of judgment discontinuity in vivo. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 36–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tesser, A., & Paulus, D. L. (1976). Toward a causal model of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1095–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., Piliavin, J., & Schmidt, L. (1973). “Playing hard to get”: Understanding an elusive phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wicklund, R. A. (2004). The role of distance in valuing another person. In R. A. Wright, J. G. Jeff, & S. S. Brehm (Eds.), Motivational analyses of social behavior: Building on Jack Brehm’s contributions to psychology (pp. 97–106). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. Wright, R. A., Toi, M., & Brehm, J. W. (1985). Difficulty and interpersonal attraction. Motivation and Emotion, 8, 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anca M. Miron
    • 1
  • David Knepfel
    • 1
  • Sarah K. Parkinson
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Wisconsin OshkoshOshkoshUSA
  2. 2.University of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations