Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 310–322

Challenge seeking: The relationship of achievement goals to choice of task difficulty level in ego-involving and neutral conditions

  • Carolyn M. Jagacinski
  • Shamala Kumar
  • Irini Kokkinou
Original Paper

Abstract

We investigated Nicholls’ (Psychol Rev 91:328–346, 1984) predictions concerning the impact of achievement goals (manipulated and measured) on risk-taking behavior. Participants were given ego-involving or neutral instructions and chose the difficulty levels for 10 nonverbal cognitive problems they performed. Consistent with Nicholls’ prediction, a moderate level of difficulty was initially preferred following neutral instructions. In contrast, following ego-involving instructions, women tended to select a lower level of difficulty and men a higher level of difficulty, reflecting the fact that men reported higher levels of perceived ability than women. Endorsements of mastery- and performance-approach goals were generally positively related to the levels of difficulty selected across trials. Endorsement of performance-avoidance goals was negatively related to the levels of difficulty selected, but the relationship diminished in later trials. During the later trials, participants given ego-involving instructions selected higher levels of difficulty than those given neutral instructions and men selected higher levels of difficulty than women.

Keywords

Achievement goals Choice of difficulty Achievement motivation Dynamics of action Gender differences 

References

  1. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1987). Achievement goals in the classroom: Student learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372. doi:10.1037/h0043445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D. (1970). The dynamics of action. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D. (1974). The dynamics of achievement-oriented activity. In J. W. Atkinson & J. O. Raynor (Eds.), Motivation and achievement. Washington, DC: V. H. Winston.Google Scholar
  6. Atkinson, J. W., & Litwin, G. H. (1960). Achievement motive and test anxiety conceived as a motive to approach success and to avoid failure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 52–63. doi:10.1037/h0041119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, R. (1993). Effects of task- and ego-achievement goals on information seeking during task engagement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 18–31.Google Scholar
  8. Butler, R. (1999). Information seeking and achievement motivation in middle childhood and adolescence: The role of conceptions of ability. Developmental Psychology, 35, 146–163. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Cooper, W. H. (1983). An achievement motivation nomological network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 841–861. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.4.841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duda, J. L., & Nicholls, J. G. (1992). Dimensions of achievement motivation in school work and sport. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 290–299. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dweck, C. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. The American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847. doi:10.2307/1131221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461–475. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (1999). Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 628–644. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.628.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Gable, S. L. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 549–563. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flanagan, J. C. (1976). Project talent data bank. Palo Alto, CA: American Institute for Rersearch.Google Scholar
  21. Graham, S., & Golan, S. (1991). Motivational influences on cognition: Task involvement, ego involvement, and depth of information processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 187–194. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541–553. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Carter, S. M., Lehto, A. T., & Elliot, A. J. (1997). Predictors and consequences of achievement goals in the college classroom: Maintaining interest and making the grade. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1284–1295. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316–330. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hyde, J. S., & Kling, K. C. (2001). Women, motivation, and achievement. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 364–378. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaplan, A., & Midgley, C. (1997). The effect of achievement goals: Does level of perceived academic competence make a difference? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 415–435. doi:10.1006/ceps.1997.0943.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuhl, J., & Blankenship, V. (1979a). Behavioral change in a constant environment: Shift to more difficult tasks with constant probability of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 551–563. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.4.551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuhl, J., & Blankenship, V. (1979b). The dynamic theory of achievement motivation: From episodic to dynamic thinking. Psychological Review, 86, 141–151. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.86.2.141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meece, J. L., Blumefeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514–523. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 351–373. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller, R. B., Greene, B. A., Montalvo, G. P., Ravindran, B., & Nichols, J. D. (1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others, and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 388–422. doi:10.1006/ceps.1996.0028.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 269–287. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0504_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  36. Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. (2001). HLM 5. Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  37. Ravindran, B., Greene, B. A., & DeBacker, T. K. (2005). Predicting preservice teachers’ cognitive engagement with goals and epistemological beliefs. The Journal of Educational Research, 98, 222–232. doi:10.3200/JOER.98.4.222-233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rocklin, T., & O’Donnell, A. M. (1987). Self-adapted testing: A performance-improving variant of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 315–319. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.3.315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). “Should I ask for help?” The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents’ help seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 329–341. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Senko, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2005). Regulation of achievement goals: The role of competence feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 320–336. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Slade, L. A., & Rush, M. C. (1991). Achievement motivation and the dynamics of task difficulty choices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 165–172. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.1.165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sorrentino, R. M., Hewitt, E. C., & Raso-Knott, P. A. (1992). Risk-taking in games of change and skill: Informational and affective influences on choice behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 522–533. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wine, J. D. (1971). Test anxiety and direction of attention. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 92–104. doi:10.1037/h0031332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wine, J. D. (1982). Evaluation anxiety: A cognitive-attentional construct. In H. W. Krohne & L. Laux (Eds.), Achievement, stress, and anxiety (Chapter 10) (pp. 207–219). New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolyn M. Jagacinski
    • 1
  • Shamala Kumar
    • 2
  • Irini Kokkinou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.University of PeradeniyaPeradeniyaSri Lanka

Personalised recommendations