Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 69–80 | Cite as

The relation between value priorities and proneness to guilt, shame, and empathy

  • Mia Silfver
  • Klaus Helkama
  • Jan-Erik Lönnqvist
  • Markku Verkasalo
Original Paper

Abstract

The relations of value priorities (the Schwartz Value Survey) to guilt, shame (Tangney’s Test of Self-Conscious Affect) and empathy (Davis’ Interpersonal Reactivity Index) were examined in two samples, one of 15–19-year-old secondary school students (= 207), and the other of military conscripts (= 503). As hypothesized, guilt-proneness was, in both samples, positively related to valuing universalism, benevolence, tradition, and conformity, and negatively related to valuing power, hedonism, stimulation, and self-direction. The results for empathic concern and perspective-taking were similar, but their relation to the openness–conservation value dimension was weaker. Shame and personal distress were weakly related to values, suggesting that voluntary control is less important for these tendencies. In general, self-transcendence and conservation values seem compatible with prosocial tendencies, whereas self-enhancement and openness do not.

Keywords

Values Guilt Shame Empathy 

References

  1. Abell, E., & Gecas, V. (1997). Guilt, shame and family socialization: A retrospective study. Journal of Family Issues, 18, 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Averill, P. M., Diefenbach, G. J., Stanley, M. A., Breckenridge, J. K., & Lusby, B. (2002). Assessment of shame and guilt in a psychiatric sample: A comparison of two measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1365–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett, K. C. (1998). The origins of guilt in early childhood. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and children (pp. 75–90). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Bybee, J. (1998). The emergence of gender differences in guilt during adolescence. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and children (pp.113–125). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Covert, M. V., Tangney, J. P., Maddux, J. E., & Heleno, N. M. (2003). Shame-proneness, guilt-proneness and interpersonal problem-solving: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Damon, W. (1983). Social and personality development: Infancy though adolescence. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, M. H. (1994). Empathy—a social psychological approach. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  9. Eisenberg, N. (1986). Altruistic emotion, cognition and behavior. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eisenberg, N., Zhou, Q., & Koller, S. (2001). Brazilian adolescents’ prosocial moral judgment and behavior: Relations to sympathy, perspective-taking, gender-role orientation and demographic characteristics. Child Development, 72, 518–534.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferguson, T. J., & Crowley, S. L. (1997). Measure for measure: A multitrait-multimethod analysis of guilt and shame. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 425–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferguson, T. J., & Eyre, H. L. (2000). Engendering gender differences in shame and guilt: Stereotypes, socialization, and situational pressures. In A. Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 254–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fontaine, J. R. J., Luyten, P., De Boeck, P., & Corveleyn, J. (2001). The test of self-conscious affect: Internal structure, differential scales and relationships with long-term affects. European Journal of Personality, 15, 449–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hardy, S. A. (2006). Identity, reasoning, and emotion: An empirical comparison of three sources of moral motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Helkama, K. (2004). Values, role-taking and empathy in moral development. New Review of Social Psychology, 3, 103–111.Google Scholar
  17. Helkama, K., Uutela, A., Pohjanheimo, E., Salminen, S., Koponen, A., & Rantanen-Väntsi, L. (2003). Moral reasoning and values in medical school: A longitudinal study in Finland. Scandinavian. Journal of Educational Research, 47, 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Helkama, K., Uutela, A., & Schwartz, S. (1992). Value systems and political cognition. In G. Breakwell (Ed.), Social psychology of political and economic cognition (pp.7–32). Surrey: Academic Press/Surrey University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development—implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Jaari, A. (2004). Self-esteem, sense of coherence and values (In Finnish). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  21. Juujärvi, S. (2003). The ethic of care and its development. A longitudinal study among practical nursing, bachelor-degree social work and law enforcement students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  22. Leith, K. P., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Empathy, shame, guilt and narratives of interpersonal conflicts: Guilt-prone people are better at perspective-taking. Journal of Personality, 66, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Litvak-Miller, W., & McDougall, D. (1997). The structure of empathy during middle childhood and its relationship to prosocial behavior. Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs, 123, 303–324.Google Scholar
  24. Lutwak, N., Panish, J. B., Ferrari, J. R., & Razzino, B. E. (2001). Shame and guilt and their relationship to positive expectations and anger expressiveness. Adolescence, 36, 641–654.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Luyten, P., Fontaine, J. R. J., & Corveleyn J. (2002). Does the Test of Self-Conscious Affect (TOSCA) measure maladaptive aspects of guilt and adaptive aspects of shame? An empirical investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1373–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40, 525–543.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murphy, B. C., Shepard, S. A., Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Guthrie, I. K. (1999). Contemporaneous and longitudinal relations of dispositional sympathy to emotionality, regulation, and social functioning. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 66–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Myyry, L., & Helkama, K. (2001). University students’ value priorities and emotional empathy. Educational Psychology, 21, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Okun, M. A., Shepard, S. A., & Eisenberg, N. (2000). The relations of emotionality and regulation to dispositional empathy-related responding among volunteers-in-training. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 367–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Padilla-Walker, L. M. (2007). Characteristics of mother–child interactions related to adolescents’ positive values and behaviors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 675–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rest, J. R. (1984). The major components of morality. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gerwitz (Eds.), Morality, moral behaviour, and moral development (pp.24–38). New York; Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Knafo, A. (2004). The big five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 789–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 574–586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. Schwartz, S. H. (2005a). Universalism values and the inclusiveness of our moral universe (in Finnish). In A.-M. Pirttilä-Backman, M. Ahokas, L. Myyry, & S. Lähteenoja (Eds.), Arvot, moraali ja yhteiskunta [Values, Morality and Society] (pp.237–257). Helsinki: University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Schwartz, S. H. (2005b). Robustness and fruitfulness of a theory of universals in individual human values. In A. Tamayo & J. B. Porto (Eds.), Valores e comportamento nas organizações [Values and behavior in organizations] (pp. 56–95). Petrópolis, Brazil: Vozes.Google Scholar
  38. Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010–1028.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tangney, J. P. (1998). How does guilt differ from shame? In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and children (pp. 1–19). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  40. Tangney, J. P., Burggraf, S. A., & Wagner, P. E. (1995). Shame-proneness, guilt-proneness, and psychological symptoms. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment and pride (pp. 343–367). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  41. Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  42. Verkasalo, M. V., Tuomivaara, P., & Lindeman, M. (1996). 15-Year-old pupils’ and their teachers’ values, and their beliefs about the values of an ideal pupil. Educational Psychology, 16, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mia Silfver
    • 1
  • Klaus Helkama
    • 1
  • Jan-Erik Lönnqvist
    • 2
  • Markku Verkasalo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Social PsychologyUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations