Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 219–231 | Cite as

Mental fatigue influence on effort-related cardiovascular response: difficulty effects and extension across cognitive performance domains

  • Rex A. WrightEmail author
  • Tonia R. Junious
  • Christin Neal
  • Ashley Avello
  • Candace Graham
  • Laura Herrmann
  • Sonia Junious
  • Natasha Walton
Original Paper

Abstract

Two experiments investigated cardiovascular effects of mental fatigue as a function of (1) the difficulty of the cognitive challenge with which participants were confronted, and (2) the relevance of that challenge to the activity that instigated the fatigue. In the first, participants performed an easy (fatigue low) or difficult (fatigue high) counting task and then were presented an arithmetic challenge (task B relevance high) or a scanning challenge (task B relevance low) with instructions that they would avoid a noise if they attained a modest performance standard. Analysis of blood pressure responses assessed during the work periods revealed fatigue main effects, reflecting stronger responses for High Fatigue participants, regardless of the character of the second task. In the second, the procedure was the same except that it included a high performance standard and provided the chance to win a prize. Analysis of the pressure data revealed fatigue x work period interactions, reflecting relatively stronger responses among High Fatigue participants in work period 1, but relatively weaker responses among these participants in work period 2. Results confirm previous findings and support an analysis of fatigue influence on effort and associated cardiovascular responses. They also argue against the idea that mental fatigue influence may be confined to relevant cognitive performance realms.

Keywords

Mental fatigue Performance resources Resource depletion Ability perception Efficacy Effort Cardiovascular response 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant BCS-0450941. Portions of the manuscript were prepared while Rex Wright was a Swiss National Science Foundation Fellow at the University of Geneva, in Geneva, Switzerland. Order of authorship was determined alphabetically for Ashley Avello, Candace Graham, Laura Herrmann, Sonia Junious, and Natasha Walton. Relative contributions of these individuals are indicated in the author lines preceding each study

References

  1. Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Twenge, J. M. (2005). Social exclusion impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 589–604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berntson, G. G., Cacioppo, J. T., & Quigley, K. S. (1993). Cardiac psychophysiology and autonomic space in humans: Empirical perspectives and conceptual implications. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 296–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blascovich, J., & Katkin, E. S. (1993). Cardiovascular reactivity to psychological stress and disease. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  4. Blascovich, J., & Mendes, W. B. (2000). Challenge and threat appraisals: The role of affective cues. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 59–82). Paris: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., & Lickel, B. (2000). Stigma, threat, and social interactions. In T. F. Heatherton, R. E. Kleck, M. R. Hebl, & J. G. Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 307–333). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  6. Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1996). The biopsychosocial model of arousal regulation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 1–51). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brehm, J. W. (1999). The intensity of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 2–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brehm, J. W., & Brummett, B. H. (1998). The emotional control of behavior. In M. Kofta, G. Weary, & G. Sedek (Eds.), Personal control in action: Cognitive and motivational mechanisms. New York: Plenum. .Google Scholar
  9. Brehm, J. W., Brummett, B. H., & Harvey, L. (1999). Paradoxical sadness. Motivation and Emotion, 23, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brehm, J. W., & Miron, A. M. (2006). Can the simultaneous experience of opposing emotions really occur? Motivation and Emotion, 30, 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. (1989). The intensity of motivation. In M. R. Rozenweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (pp. 109–131). Palo Alto: Annual Reviews, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Brener, J. (1987). Behavioral energetics: Some effects of uncertainty on the mobilization and distribution of energy. Psychophysiology, 24, 499–512.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brinkmann, K., & Gendolla, G. H. E. (2007). Dysphoria and mobilization of mental effort: Effects on cardiovascular reactivity. Motivation and Emotion (in press).Google Scholar
  14. Brown, P. C., Smith, T. W., & Benjamin, L. S. (1998). Perceptions of spouse dominance predict blood pressure reactivity during marital interactions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 20, 286–293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brownley, K. A., Hurwitz, B. E., & Schneiderman, N. (2000). Cardiovascular psychophysiology. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 224–264). New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  16. Clements, K., & Turpin, G. (1995). Effects of feedback and task difficulty on electrodermal activity and heart rate: An examination of Fowles = three arousal model. Journal of Psychophysiology, 9, 231–242.Google Scholar
  17. Dembroski, T. M., Schmidt, T. H., & Blümchen, G. (1983). Biobehavioral bases of behavior. Basel; New York: Karger.Google Scholar
  18. Elliott, R. (1969). Tonic heart rate: Experiments on the effects of collative variables lead to a hypothesis about its motivational significance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 211–228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fairclough, S. H. (2001). Mental effort regulation and the functional impairment of the driver. In P. A. Hancock & P. A. Desmond (Eds.), Stress, workload and fatigue (pp. 479–502). Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Fairclough, S. H., & Graham, R. (1999). Impairment of driving performance caused by sleep deprivation or alcohol: A comparative study. Human Factors, 41, 118–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D.M., Brewer, L. E., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 325–336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gendolla, G. H. E., & Krüsken, J. (2001). The joint impact of mood state and task difficulty on cardiovascular and electrodermal reactivity in active coping. Psychophysiology, 38, 548–556.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gendolla, G. H. E., & Richter, M. (2005). Ego involvement and effort: Cardiovascular, electrodermal, and performance effects. Psychophysiology, 42, 595–603.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gendolla, G. H. E., & Richter, M. (2006a). Cardiovascular reactivity during performance under social evaluation: The moderating role of task difficulty. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 185–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gendolla, G. H. E., & Richter, M. (2006b). Ego-involvement and the difficulty law of motivation: Effects on performance-related cardiovascular response. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1188–1203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gendolla, G. H. E., & Wright, R. A. (2005). Motivation in social settings: Studies of effort-related cardiovascular arousal. In J. P. Forgas, K. Williams, & B. von Hippel (Eds.), Social motivation: Conscious and nonconscious processes. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Harkins, S. G. (2006). Mere effort as the mediator of the evaluation-performance relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 436–455.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hilmert, C. J., Kulik, J. A., & Christenfeld, N. (2002). The varied impact of social support on cardiovascular reactivity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kukla, A. (1972). Foundations of an attributional theory of performance. Psychological Review, 79, 454–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Light, K. C. (1981). Cardiovascular responses to effortful active coping: Implications for the role of stress in hypertension development. Psychophysiology, 18, 216–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Llabre, M. M., Spitzer, S. B., Saab, P. G., Ironson, G. H., & Schneiderman, N. (1991). The reliability and specificity of delta versus residualized change as measures of cardiovascular reactivity to behavioral challenges. Psychophysiology, 28, 701–711.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miron, A. M., Parkinson, S. K., & Brehm, J. W. (2007). Does happiness function like a motivational state? Cognition and Emotion (in press).Google Scholar
  33. Muraven, M. B., Shmueli, D., & Burkley, E. (2006). Conserving self-control strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 524–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Muraven, M. B., & Slessareva, E. (2003). Mechanisms of self-control failure: Motivation and limited resources. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 894–906.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Obrist, P. A. (1981). Cardiovascular psychophysiology: A perspective. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  36. Scherer, K. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In K. R. Scherer & Ekman, P. (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293–317). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Schmeichel, B. J., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Intellectual performance and ego depletion: Role of the self in logical reasoning and other information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 33–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith, T. W., Baldwin, M., & Christenson, A. J. (1990). Interpersonal influence as active coping: Effects of task difficulty on cardiovascular reactivity. Psychophysiology, 27, 429–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wright, R. A., & Dismukes, A. (1995). Cardiovascular effects of experimentally-induced efficacy (ability) appraisals at low and high levels of avoidant task demand. Psychophysiology, 32, 172–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wright, R. A., & Kirby, L. D. (2001). Effort determination of cardiovascular response: An integrative analysis with applications in social psychology. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 255–307). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  41. Wright, R. A., & Lockard, S. (2006). Sex, outcome expectancy, and cardiovascular response to a masculine appetitive challenge. Psychophysiology, 43, 190–196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wright, R. A., Martin, R. E., & Bland, J. L. (2003). Energy resource depletion, task difficulty, and cardiovascular response to a mental arithmetic challenge. Psychophysiology, 40, 98–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wright, R. A., & Penacerrada, D. K. (2002). Energy resource depletion, ability perception, and cardiovascular response to a behavioral challenge. Psychophysiology, 39, 182–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rex A. Wright
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tonia R. Junious
    • 1
  • Christin Neal
    • 1
  • Ashley Avello
    • 1
  • Candace Graham
    • 1
  • Laura Herrmann
    • 1
  • Sonia Junious
    • 1
  • Natasha Walton
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB)BirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations