Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 61–70 | Cite as

Achievement Goals in Social Interactions: Learning with Mastery vs. Performance Goals

  • Céline Darnon
  • Fabrizio Butera
  • Judith M. Harackiewicz
Original Paper

Abstract

Little work has studied achievement goals in social interaction situations. The present experiment aimed at contributing to this matter by showing the potential of social interaction (in particular disagreement) to moderate the effects of achievement goals on learning. Participants were led to think they interacted with a partner, sharing opinions about a text that they were studying. Mastery and performance goals were manipulated. During the “interaction,” they received either disagreement or agreement from this bogus partner. Results showed that a condition in which mastery goals were induced led to better learning than a performance goal condition only when the partner disagreed. No differences between goal conditions were observed when the partner agreed. Implications for achievement goal research are discussed.

Keywords

Mastery goals Performance goals Social interactions Conflict Learning 

References

  1. Ames, G. J., & Murray, F. B. (1982). When two wrongs make a right: Promoting cognitive change by social conflict. Developmental Psychology, 18, 894–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Buchs, C., Butera, F., Mugny, G., & Darnon, C. (2004). Conflict elaboration and cognitive outcomes. Theory into Practice, 43, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butera, F., Huguet, P., Mugny, G., & Pérez, J. A. (1994). Socio-epistemic conflict and constructivism. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 53, 229–239.Google Scholar
  5. Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (1995). Conflict between incompetences and influence of a low expertise source in hypothesis testing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 457–462.Google Scholar
  6. Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (2001). Conflicts and social influences in hypothesis testing. In C. K. W. De Dreu & N. K. De Vries (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence. Implications for innovation (pp. 161–182). Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, R. (1992). What young people want to know when: Effects of mastery and ability goals on interest in different kinds of social comparisons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 934–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler, R. (1995). Motivational and informational functions and consequences of children’s attention to peers’ work. Journal of Educational psychology, 87, 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler, R., & Neuman, O. (1995). Effects of task and ego achievement goals on help-seeking behaviors and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Covington, M. V., & Omelich, C. L. (1984). Task-oriented versus competitive learning structures: Motivational and performance consequences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1038–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Darnon, C., Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2002). Epistemic and relational conflict in sharing information during cooperative learning. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 61, 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darnon, C., & Butera, F. (2005). Buts d’accomplissement, stratégies d’étude, et motivation intrinsèque: présentation d’un domaine de recherche et validation française de l’échelle d’Elliot et McGregor (2001) [Achievement goals, study strategies, and intrinsic motivation: Presenting a domain of research and the French validation of Elliot and McGregor’s scale (2001)]. L’Année Psychologique, 105, 105–131.Google Scholar
  13. Darnon, C., Doll, S., & Butera, F. (in press). Dealing with a disagreeing partner: Relational and epistemic conflict elaboration. European Journal of Psychology of Education.Google Scholar
  14. Darnon, C., Muller, D., Schrager, S. M., Pannuzzo, N., & Butera, F. (2006). Mastery and performance goals predict epistemic and relational conflict regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 766–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Doise, W., Mugny G., & Pérez, J. A. (1998). The social construction of knowledge: Social marking and socio-cognitive conflict. In U. Flick (Ed.), The psychology of the social (pp. 77–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Doise, W., Mugny, G., & Perret-Clermont, A. N. (1975). Social Interaction and the development of cognitive operations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 367–383.Google Scholar
  19. Duda, J. L., & Nicholls, J. G. (1992). Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 290–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elliot, A. J. (1997). Integrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance motivation. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 143–179). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  22. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (1999). Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 628–644.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elliot A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2*2 Achievement Goal Framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gabriele, A. J., & Montecinos, C. (2001). Collaborating with a skilled peer: The influence of achievement goals and perception of partners’ competence on the participation and learning of low-achieving students. The Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 152–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grant, H., & Dweck, C. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541–553.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K., Carter, S. M., Lehto, A. T., & Elliot, A. J. (1997). Predictors and consequences of achievement goals in the college classroom: Maintaining interest and making the grade. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1284–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jagacinsky, C. M., & Nicholls, J. G. (1987). Competence and affect in task involvement and ego-involvement. The impact of social comparison information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1993). Structuring academic controversy. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods. Westport: Greenwood Publishing group.Google Scholar
  33. Kagan, J. (1972). Motives and development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 51–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaplan, A. (2004). Achievement goals and intergroup relations. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in research on motivation and achievement: Vol. 13: Motivating students, improving schools: The legacy of Carol Midgley (pp. 97–136). United Kingdom: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  35. Kaplan, A., & Midgley, C. (1997). The effect of achievement goals: Does level of perceived academic competence make a difference? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 415–435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Karabenick, S. A. (2003). Seeking help in large college classes: A person-centered approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Levine, J. M. (1983). Social comparison and education. In J. M. Levine & M. C. Wang (Eds.) Teacher and student perception: Implications for learning (pp. 29–55). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  38. Licht, B. G., & Dweck, C. S. (1984). Determinants of academic achievement: The interaction of children’s achievement orientations with skill area. Developmental Psychology, 20, 628–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Limon, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11, 357–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1991). Enhancing students’ motivation: a schoolwide approach. Educational Psychologist, 26, 399–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Middleton, M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McGarty, C., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., & Haslam, S. A. (1993). The creation of uncertainty in the influence process: The roles of stimulus information and disagreement with similar others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 17–38.Google Scholar
  44. Monteil, J. M., & Chambres, P. (1990). Eléments pour une exploration des dimensions du conflit socio-cognitif: une expérimentation chez l’adulte [Elements for exploring dimensions of socio-cognitive conflict: an experiment on adults]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 4, 499–517.Google Scholar
  45. Mugny, G., De Paolis, P., & Carugati, F. (1984). Social regulations in cognitive development. In W. Doise & A. Palmonari (Eds.), Social interaction in individual development (pp. 127–146). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Piaget, J. (1975). L’équilibration des structures cognitives [The equilibration of cognitive structures]. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  49. Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1996). The conflict elaboration theory of social influence. In E. Witte, H., & J. Davis, H. (Eds.), Understanding Group Behavior (Vol. 2, Small Group Processes and Interpersonal Relations, pp. 191–210). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  50. Py, J., & Rainis, N. (2001). System variables and estimator variables in eyewitness testimony. In F. Butera & G. Mugny. (Eds.), Social influence in social reality. Promoting individual and social change (pp. 249–264). Ashland, US: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.Google Scholar
  51. Quiamzade, A., & Mugny, G. (2001). Social influence dynamics in aptitude tasks. Social Psychology of Education, 4, 311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). Should I ask for help? The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents’ help seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ryan, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., & Midgley, C. (2001). Avoiding seeking help in the classroom: Who and why? Educational Psychology Review, 13, 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schachter, S. (1959). The psychology of affiliation. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, K., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1981). Can conflict be constructive? Controversy versus concurrence seeking in learning groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 651–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Utman, C. H. (1997). Performance effects of motivational state: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 170–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Céline Darnon
    • 1
    • 3
  • Fabrizio Butera
    • 4
  • Judith M. Harackiewicz
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale de Grenoble-ChambéryUniversité Pierre Mendès FranceGrenobleFrance
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et CognitiveUniversité Blaise PascalClermont-FerrandFrance
  4. 4.Institut des Sciences Sociales et PédagogiquesUniversité de Lausanne - AnthropoleLausanneSuisse (Switzerland)

Personalised recommendations