Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 42–55 | Cite as

The Approach and Avoidance Function of Guilt and Shame Emotions: Comparing Reactions to Self-Caused and Other-Caused Wrongdoing

Original Paper

Although theory suggests that guilt motivates approach tendencies and shame motivates avoidance tendencies, research has not always supported these relationships. The present study examined the degree to which shame and guilt are uniquely predictive of avoidance and approach motives, respectively, for both self-caused and other-caused wrongdoings. Results revealed that shame and guilt are more highly correlated for self-caused compared to other-caused wrongdoings. This greater blending of shame and guilt in response to self-caused acts makes it somewhat more difficult to distinguish between different unique motivational correlates of these two emotions. However, in response to other-caused wrongdoings, shame uniquely predicted avoidance tendencies (distancing from the event), whereas guilt uniquely predicted approach tendencies (repairing the event). The implications for research on motivation, emotion, and social relations are discussed.


shame guilt group-based emotion approach–avoidance motivation 



This research was supported by a National Science Foundation Grant #BCS-0112427 awarded to the first and second authors, a faculty small grant awarded to the first author (T. Schmader) from the University of Arizona Foundation, and a Zumberge Foundation Grant to the second author (B. Lickel). We thank Greg Willard, Shawn Williams, Jonah Firestone, Heather Gangestad, Amy Baesler, Shawna Boggie, Jill Endres, Emily Bacal, Lorena Bravo, Chris Davis, Calli Payne, Jessica Pishney, Cynthia Wallentin, and Ali Winkler for their invaluable help with data collection, entry, and coding.


  1. Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243–267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  3. Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Forster, J., Grant, H., & Idson, L. C. (2001). Success/failure feedback, expectancies, and approach/avoidance motivation: How regulatory focus moderates classic relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotion action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Harmon-Jones, E. (2004). Contributions from research on anger and cognitive dissonance to understanding the motivational functions of asymmetrical frontal brain activity. Biological Psychology, 67, 51–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harris, N. (2003). Reassessing the dimensionality of the moral emotions. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 457–473.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iyer, A., Leach, C. W., & Crosby, F. J. (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 117–129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Iyer, A., Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2006). Predicting opposition to the occupation of Iraq: The role of group-based anger, shame, and guilt. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  13. Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2005). Ashamed to be an American? The role of identification in predicting shame for Anti-Arab prejudice after 9–11. Self and Identity, 4, 331–348.Google Scholar
  14. Lickel, B., Schmader, T., Curtis, M., Scarnier, M., & Ames, D. R. (2005). Vicarious shame and guilt. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lutwak, N., Panish, J., & Farrari, J. (2003). Shame and guilt: Characterological vs. behavioral self-blame and their relationship to fear of intimacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 909–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roseman, I. J., Wiest, C., & Schwartz, T. S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 206–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Scherer, K. R., & Wallbott, H. G. (1994). Evidence for universality and cultural variation of differential emotion response patterning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 310–328.Google Scholar
  19. Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2006). Stigma and shame: Emotional responses to the stereotypic actions of one’s ethnic ingroup. In S. Levin & C. van Laar (Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological approaches. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813–838.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tangney, J. P., & Fischer, K. W. (1995). Self-conscious emotions. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  22. Tangney, J. P., Miller, R. S., Flicker, L., & Barlow, D. B. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1256–1269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wicker, F. W., Payne, G. C., & Morgan, R. D. (1983). Participant descriptions of guilt and shame. Motivation and Emotion, 7, 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations