Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 1–12 | Cite as

A premature consensus: are happiness and sadness truly opposite affects?

Original Paper

Abstract

Within the debate on the structure of affect, a consensus began emerging in the last decade regarding the bipolarity of happiness–sadness. We argue that this consensus is premature. Focusing on the psychometrics of momentary affect, particularly happiness and sadness, and using a simulation study, a large-scale data set, and 2 experiments manipulating affect, we plot a map of affective space that departs from the consensus. One key departure is the finding that happiness and sadness are not bipolar opposites. Another is that nonuniform skewness plays a major role in studies of affective structure, but can be addressed with appropriate analyses.

Keywords

Affect Bipolarity Circumplex Mood Structure 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by a contract with the US Army Research Institute (MDA903-93-K-0008) and an AASERT grant from the US Department of Defense (DAAHO4-95-1-0213). The views, opinions, and findings contained in this paper are those of the authors and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, or decision, unless so designated by other official documentation. We benefited greatly from helpful comments made by Doug Billings, Jim Cranford, Wendi Gardner, Nilly Mor, Suzanne Pineles, Ulrich Schimmack, David Watson, Iftah Yovel, and several anonymous reviewers on earlier drafts of this manuscript, and from editorial suggestions made by Klaus Scherer.

References

  1. Acton, G. S., & Revelle, W. (2002). Interpersonal personality measures show circumplex structure based on new psychometric criteria. Journal of Personality Assessment, 79, 446–471.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonanno, G. A., Coifman, K. G., & Rafaeli, E. (2005). Affect dynamics, bereavement and resilience to loss. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  3. Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 401–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cacioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carver, C. S. (2001). Affect and the functional bases of behavior: On the dimensional structure of affective experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, L. A., Watson, D., & Mineka, S. (1994). Temperament, personality, and the mood and anxiety disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 103–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davidson, R. J. (1993). Parsing affective space: Perspectives from neuropsychology and psychophysiology. Neuropsychology, 7, 464–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feldman, L. A. (1995a). Variation in the circumplex structure of mood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 806–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feldman, L. A. (1995b). Valence focus and arousal focus: Individual differences in the structure of affective experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feldman Barrett, L. A., & Russell, J. A. (1998). Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 967–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fowles, D. (1980). The three arousal model: Implications from Gray's two-factor learning theory for heart rate, electrodermal activity, and psychopathy. Psychophysiology, 17, 87–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gray, J. A. (1994). The neuropsychology of the emotions. In S. H. M. van Goozen, N. E. Van de Poll, & J. A. Sargeant (Eds.), Emotions: Essays on emotion theory. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Green, D. P., Goldman, S. L., & Salovey, P. (1993). Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1029–1041.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Green, D. P., & Salovey, P. (1999). In what sense are positive and negative affect independent? A reply to Tellegen, Watson, and Clark. Psychological Science, 10, 304–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heller, W. (1990). The neuropsychology of emotion: Developmental patterns and implications for psychopathology. In N. L. Stein & B. Leventhal (Eds.), Psychological and biological approaches to emotion (pp. 167–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Heller, W. (1993). Neuropsychological mechanisms of individual differences in emotion, personality, and arousal. Neuropsychology, 7, 476–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1992). Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 25–59.Google Scholar
  19. Larsen, J. T., McGraw, A. P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Can people feel happy and sad at the same time? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 684–696.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Larsen, J. T., McGraw, A. P., Mellers, B. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The agony of victory and thrill of defeat: Mixed emotional reactions to disappointing wins and relieving losses. Psychological Science, 15, 325–330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meddis, R. (1972). Bipolar factors in mood adjective checklists. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 11, 178–184.Google Scholar
  22. Meyer, G. J., & Shack, J. R. (1989). Structural convergence of mood and personality: Evidence for old and new directions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 691–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nunnally, J. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Rafaeli, E., Drejet, R., Ehrlich, D., Teicher, M., & Bodkin, J. A. (submitted for publication). Emotion differentiation in clinical and non-clinical populations.Google Scholar
  25. Rafaeli, E., Rogers, G. M., & Revelle, W. (submitted for publication). Affective synchrony: Individual differences in mixed emotions.Google Scholar
  26. Reich, J. W., Zautra, A. J., & Davis, M. (2003). Dimensions of affect relationships: Models and their integrative implications. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Revelle, W., & Anderson, K. J. (1996). Time of day and activation states: Interactions with impulsivity and neuroticism. Paper presented at the European Association of Personality Psychology, Belgium.Google Scholar
  28. Revelle, W., & Rocklin, T. (1979). Very simple structure: An alternative procedure for estimating the optimal number of interpretable factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14, 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–172.Google Scholar
  30. Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999a). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999b). The phoenix of bipolarity: Reply to Watson and Tellegen (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 611–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schimmack, U. (2001). Pleasure, displeasure, and mixed feelings: Are semantic opposites mutually exclusive? Cognition and Emotion, 15, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schimmack, U. (2005). Response latencies of pleasure and displeasure ratings: Further evidence for mixed feelings. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 671–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schimmack, U., Böckenholt, U., & Reisenzein, R. (2002). Response styles in affect ratings: Making a mountain out of a Molehill. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 461–483.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tellegen, A., Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1999a). On the dimensional and hierarchical structure of affect. Psychological Science, 10, 297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tellegen, A., Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1999b). Further support for hierarchical model of affect: Reply to Green & Salovey. Psychological Science, 10, 307–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thayer, R. E. (1967). Measurement of activation through self-report. Psychological Reports, 20, 663–678.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Thayer, R. E. (1986). Activation–Deactivation Check-List: Current overview and structural analysis. Psychological Reports, 58, 607–614.Google Scholar
  39. Thayer, R. E. (1987). Problem perception, optimism, and related states as a function of time of day (diurnal rhythm), and moderate exercise: Two arousal states in interaction. Motivation and Emotion, 11, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van Schuur, W. H., & Kliers, H. A. L. (1994). Why factor analysis is often the incorrect model for analyzing bipolar concepts, and what model to use instead. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Watson, D. (1988). The vicissitudes of mood measurement: Effects of varying descriptors, time frames, and response formats on measures of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 128–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1999). Issues in dimensional structure of affect—Effects of descriptors, measurement error, and response formats: Comment on Russell and Carroll (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 601–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 820–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yik, M. S. M., Russell, J. A., & Feldman Barrett, L. (1999). Structure of self-reported current affect: Integration and beyond. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 600–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology Department, Barnard CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations