Oral LD50 toxicity modeling and prediction of per- and polyfluorinated chemicals on rat and mouse
Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analyses were performed using the LD50 oral toxicity data of per- and polyfluorinated chemicals (PFCs) on rodents: rat and mouse. PFCs are studied under the EU project CADASTER which uses the available experimental data for prediction and prioritization of toxic chemicals for risk assessment by using the in silico tools. The methodology presented here applies chemometrical analysis on the existing experimental data and predicts the toxicity of new compounds. QSAR analyses were performed on the available 58 mouse and 50 rat LD50 oral data using multiple linear regression (MLR) based on theoretical molecular descriptors selected by genetic algorithm (GA). Training and prediction sets were prepared a priori from available experimental datasets in terms of structure and response. These sets were used to derive statistically robust and predictive (both internally and externally) models. The structural applicability domain (AD) of the models were verified on 376 per- and polyfluorinated chemicals including those in REACH preregistration list. The rat and mouse endpoints were predicted by each model for the studied compounds, and finally 30 compounds, all perfluorinated, were prioritized as most important for experimental toxicity analysis under the project. In addition, cumulative study on compounds within the AD of all four models, including two earlier published models on LC50 rodent analysis was studied and the cumulative toxicity trend was observed using principal component analysis (PCA). The similarities and the differences observed in terms of descriptors and chemical/mechanistic meaning encoded by descriptors to prioritize the most toxic compounds are highlighted.
KeywordsPerfluorinated chemicals Oral LD50 QSAR Toxicity Rodents REACH
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.US-EPA, http://www.epa.gov/oppt/pfoa/pubs/related.htm. Accessed 26 Apr 2010
- 2.Canadian-DSL, http://ec.gc.ca/substances/ese/eng/dsl/dslprog.cfm. Accessed 26 Apr 2010
- 3.EU-REACH, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/reach/reach_intro.htm. Accessed 26 Apr 2010
- 6.Tetko IV, Sushko I, Pandey AK, Zhu H, Tropsha A, Papa E, Oberg T, Todeschini R, Fourches D, Varnek A (2008) Critical assessment of QSAR models of environmental toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: focusing on applicability domain and overfitting by variable selection. J Chem Inf Model 48: 1733–1746. doi:10.1021/ci800151m PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Kubinyi H, (ed) (1993) 3D QSAR in drug design, vol 1. In: Theory methods and applications (Three-dimensional quantitative structure activity relationships). Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 13.Matthews EJ, Kruhlak NL, Benz RD, Ivanov J, Klopman G, Contrera JF (2007) A comprehensive model for reproductive and developmental toxicity hazard identification: II. Construction of QSAR models to predict activities of untested chemicals. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 47: 136–155. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.10.001 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.EU FP7 project CADASTER, http://www.cadaster.eu. Accessed 26 Apr 2010
- 16.Holzapfel W (1966) Uses of fluorinated surfactants. Fette Seifen Anstrichm 68: 837–842Google Scholar
- 17.Gottschall N, Topp E, Edwards M, Russell P, Payne M, Kleywegt S, Curnoe W, Lapen DR (2010) Polybrominated diphenyl ethers, perfluorinated alkylated substances, and metals in tile drainage and groundwater following applications of municipal biosolids to agricultural fields. Sci Total Environ 408: 873–883. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.063 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.UNEP 2007. POPRC3: development of risk management evaluation. UNEP/POPS/POPRC.3/20.http://chm.pops.int/Portals/0/Repository/poprc3/UNEP-POPS-POPRC.3-POPRC-3-5.English.PDF. Accessed 26 Apr 2010
- 20.Poulsen PB, Jensen AA, Wallstrom E (2005) More environmentally friendly alternatives to PFOS-compounds and PFOA. Environmental Project No. 1013. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
- 35.US EPA 2000. Perfluorooctyl sulfonates; proposed significant new use rule. Federal Register 65:62319–62333Google Scholar
- 36.Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Fluorinated Telomers. http://www.epa.gov/oppt/pfoa/index.html. Accessed 26 Apr 2010
- 37.European Chemical Agency. http://apps.echa.europa.eu/preregistered/pre-registered-sub. Accessed 26 Apr 2010
- 38.ChemID Plus. http://chem.sis.nlm.nih.gov/chemidplus. Accessed 26 Apr 2010
- 40.Hyperchem, 7.03, (2002) Hypercube Inc., Florida USA. http://www.hyper.com
- 41.Todeschini R, Consonni V, Mauri A, Pavan M (2007) DRAGON v.5 Talete srl. Milan, Italy. http://www.talete.it.
- 42.Todeschini R, Consonni V (2009) Handbook of molecular descriptors. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- 45.Todeschini R, Consonni V, Pavan M (2002) MOBY DIGS - Software for multilinear regression analysis and variable subset selection by genetic algorithm. Ver. 1.2 for Windows. Talete srl, Milan, ItalyGoogle Scholar
- 50.OECD Guidelines. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/37/37849783.pdf Accessed 26 Apr 2010