Mechanics of Composite Materials

, Volume 55, Issue 5, pp 655–666 | Cite as

Static and Fatigue Characteristics of Pinned Metal-Composite Joints

  • G. Beketova
  • M. Shevtsova
  • V. SymonovEmail author

Metal-composite joining methods currently rely almost exclusively on the adhesive bonding, the application of mechanical fasteners or a combination of the methods, the pros and cons of which are well known. In this article, a manufacturing-oriented solution for increasing the static and fatigue characteristics of metal composite bolted T-joints loaded in the out-of-plane direction by reinforcing the composite basement with a thin metal plate having die cut pins is proposed. Static load–displacement and fatigue life curves were obtained experimentally for different types of joints. The results obtained showed that, for a fiberglass/epoxy laminate, the solution proposed increased its static and fatigue failure loads by 64 and 50% respectively. It was also found that pinned adhesive joints were more effective than the conventional bolted ones at high-cycle loadings (the number of cycles exceeded 104).


pinned metal-composite joints out-of-plane loading interlaminar static and fatigue strengths,pullouttest 



This work was performed with the financial support FP7 KhAI-ERA project “Integrating the National Aerospace University “KhAI” into ERA” (GA No 294311) and NETME Centre built in the frame NETME Centre project “New Technologies for Mechanical Engineering” (Reg. No. CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0002) with the financial support from the Operational Program Research and Development for Innovations of Czech Republic.


  1. 1.
    A. C. Nogueira, K. Drechsler, and E. Hombergsmeier, “Properties and failure mechanisms of 3D-reinforced joint,” JEC Composites Magazine, 69, 39-44 (2011).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Yudhanto, N. Watanabe, Y. Iwahori, and H. Hoshi, “Effect of stitch density on fatigue characteristics and damage mechanisms of stitched carbon/epoxy composites,” Composites: Part A, 60, 52-65 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Yang, J. Zhang, A. P. Mouritz, and C. H. Wang, “Healing of carbon fiber–epoxy composite T-joints using mendable polymer fiber stitching,” Composites: Part B, 45, No. 1, 1499-1507 (2013).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. P. Mouritz, “Review of z-pinned composite laminates,” Composites: Part A, 38, No. 12, 2383-2397 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. W. Byrd and V. Birman, “Effectiveness of z–pins in preventing delamination of co-cured composite joints on the example of a double cantilever test,” Composites: Part B, 37, Nos. 3-4, 365-378 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. M. Koh, S. Feih, and A. P. Mouritz, “Experimental determination of the structural properties and strengthening mechanisms of z-pinned composite T-joints,” Compos. Struct., 93, No. 9, 2222-2230 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. B. Park, B. H. Lee, J. H. Kweon, et al., “The strength of composite bonded T-joints transversely reinforced by carbon pins,” Compos. Struct., 94, 625-634 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Ji, J. H. Kweon, and J. H. Choi, “Fatigue characteristics of stainless steel pin-reinforced composite hat joints,” Compos. Struct., 108, 49-56 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. M. Koh, S. Feih, and A. P. Mouritz, “Strengthening mechanics of thin and thick composite T-joints reinforced with z-pins,” Composites: Part A, 43, No. 8, 1308-1317 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Chang, A. P. Mouritz, and B. N. Cox, “Properties and failure mechanisms of z-pinned laminates in monotonic and cyclic tension,” Composites: Part A, 37, No. 10, 1501-1513 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Heimbs, A. C. Nogueira, E. Hombergsmeier, et al., “Failure behaviour of composite T-joints with novel metallic arrow-pin reinforcement,” Compos. Struct., 110, 16-28 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. A. Steeves and N. A. Fleck, “In-plane properties of composite laminates with through – thickness pin reinforcement,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 43, 3197-3212 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. P. Mouritz and B. N. Cox, “A mechanistic interpretation of the comparative in-plane mechanical properties of 3D woven, stitched, and pinned composites,” Composites: Part A, 41, 709-728 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. P. Mouritz, P. Chang, and M. D. Isa, “Z-pin composites: Aerospace structural design considerations,” J. Aerospace Engineering, 24, 425-432 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    I. S. Karpov, Joining of Parts and Units Made of Composite Materials [in Russian], National Aerospace University“Kharkov Aviation Institute,” Kharkov (2006).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    I. S. Karpov, Design of Composite Parts and Units [in Russian], National Aerospace University “Kharkov Aviation Institute,” Kharkov (2010).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    F. Bianchi, Numerical modelling of across-the-thickness reinforced structural joints, Ph.D. thesis. Cranfield, Cranfield University (2012).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. Kelly and S. Hallström, “Strength and failure mechanisms of composite laminates subject to localized transverse loading,” Compos. Struct., 69, No. 3, 301-314 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. T. Vazquez, B. Castanié, J. J. Barrau, and N. Swiergiel, “Multi-level analysis of low-cost Z-pinned composite joints: Part 1: Single Z-pin behavior,” Composites: Part A, 42, No. 12, 2070-2081 (2011).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. T. Vazquez, B. Castanié, J. J. Barrau, and N. Swiergiel, “Multi-level analysis of low-cost Z-pinned composite joints: Part 2: Joint behavior,” Composites: Part A, 42, No. 12, 2082-2092 (2011).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. P. Kabche, V. Caccese, K. A. Berube, and R. Bragg, “Experimental characterization of hybrid composite-to-metal bolted joints under flexural loading,” Composites: Part B, 38, 66-78 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    B. Kolesnikov, L. Herbeck, and A. Fink, “CFRP/titanium hybrid material for improving composite bolted joints,” Compos. Struct., 83, 368-380 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    T. Löbel, B. Kolesnikov, S. Scheffler, et al., “Enhanced tensile strength of composite joints by using staple-like pins: Working principles and experimental validation,” Compos. Struct., 106, 453-460 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Airbus Operations Gmbh., Method for connecting a fiber composite component to a structural component of an aircraft and spacecraft and a corresponding arrangement. Inventors: M. Pacchione and D. Furfari. US Patent Specification 20130149501. 13.06.2013.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. Banbury and D. W. Kelly, “A study of fastener pull-through failure of composite laminates. Part 1: Experimental,” Compos. Struct., 45, 241-254 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    L. Adam, “Discrete ply model of circular pullthrough test of fasteners in laminates,” Compos. Struct., 94, 3082-3091 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. Grassi and X. Zhang, “Finite element analyses of mode I interlaminar delamination in z-fiber reinforced composite laminates,” Composites Science and Technology, 63, 1815-1832 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    L. C. Dickinson, G. L. Farley, and M. K. Hinders, “Prediction of effective three-dimensional elastic constants of translaminar reinforced composites,” Journal of Composite Materials, 33, 1002-29 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    D.J. Barrett, “The mechanics of z-fiber reinforcement,” Compos. Struct., 36, 23-32 (1996). D. J. Barrett, “The mechanics of z-fiber reinforcement,” Compos. Struct., 36, 23-32 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    H. Mick, “Micro-sculptures give metal the Velcro touch,” New Sci, 182, Iss. 2447, 8-21 (2004).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Aerospace University - “Kharkiv Aviation Institute”KharkivUkraine
  2. 2.Brno University of TechnologyFaculty of Mechanical EngineeringBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations