Advertisement

Mechanics of Composite Materials

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 121–134 | Cite as

Crashworthiness Experiment and Simulation Analysis of Composite Thin-Walled Circular Tubes Under Axial Crushing

  • H. L. Mou
  • J. Xie
  • X. Su
  • Z. Y. FengEmail author
Article
  • 20 Downloads

To reveal the energy absorbing mechanism of thin-walled circular tubes made of a T700/3234 composite, tests were first conducted to find its material properties, and then quasi-static axial crushing tests were performed to determine the failure modes and were measured by material performance tests, and the damage mechanism and energy absorption characteristics of the tubes. The effects of the mechanism and ply orientations on the failure modes and energy absorption characteristics were further analyzed. Stacked shell finite-element models are developed using the Puck2000 and Yamada Sun failure criteria and are verified by comparing simulation results with test data. The calculated initial peak crushing and mean crushing forces and the specific energy absorption agreed well with test data. The effect of layer sequence on the energy absorption characteristics of the composite circular tubes are compared on the basis of verified finite-element models.

Keywords

crashworthiness failure modes stacked shell FE model layer sequence 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge supports of the Science and Technology Item from the Civil Aviation Administration of China (MHRD20140207), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (3122017020, 2017QD10S), and the Fund of Tianjin Key Laboratory of Civil Aircraft Airworthiness and Maintenance in Civil Aviation University of China.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Abramowitz, T. G. Smith, T. Vu, and J. Zvanya, “Vertical drop test of a narrow-body transport fuselage section with overhead stowage bins,” DOT/FAA/AR-01/100 (2002).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. E. Jackson and E. L. Fasanella, “Crash simulation of vertical drop tests of two Boeing 737 fuselage sections,” DOT/FAA/AR-02/62 (2002).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. E. Jackson and E. L. Fasanella, “Development and validation of a finite element simulation of a vertical drop test of an ATR 42 regional transport airplane,” DOT/FAA/AR-08/19 (2008).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Z. Y. Feng, H. L. Mou, T. C. Zou, and J. REN, “Research on effects of composite skin on crashworthiness of composite fuselage section,” Int. J. Crashworth., 18, No. 5, 459-464 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Waimer, D. Kohlgruber, D. Hachenberg, and H. Voggenreiter, “Experimental study of CFRP components subjected to dynamic crash loads,” Compos. Struct., 105, 288-299 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Delsart, G. Portemont, and M. Waimer, “Crash testing of a CFRP commercial aircraft sub-cargo fuselage section,” 21st European Conference on Fracture, 20-24 June, Catania, Italy, 2198-2205 (2016).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Siromani, G. Henderson, D. Mikita, K. Mirarchi, R. Park, J. Smolko, J. Awerbuch, and T. M. Tan, “An experimental study on the effect of failure chamfer mechanisms on the energy absorption capability of CFRP tubes under axial compression”, Composites: Part A, 64, 25-35 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Meredith, E. Bilson, R. Powe, E. Collings, and K. Kirwan, “A performance versus cost analysis of prepreg carbon fibre epoxy energy absorption structures,” Compos. Struct., 124, 206-213 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Ostré, C. Bouvet, C. Minot, and J. Aboissière, “Experimental analysis of CFRP laminates subjected to compression after edge impact,” Compos. Struct., 152, 767-778 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Jackson, S. Dutton, A. J. Gunnion, and D. Kelly, “Investigation into laminate design of open carbon-fibre/epoxy sections by quasi-static and dynamic crushing,” Compos. Struct., 93, 2646-2654 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Feraboli, “Development of a corrugated test specimen for composite materials energy absorption,” J. Compos. Mater., 42, 229-256 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Palanivelu, W. V. Paepegem, J. Degrieck, D. Kakogiannis, J. V. Ackeren, D. V. Hemelrijck, J. Wastiels, and J. Vantomme, “Comparative study of the quasi-static energy absorption of small-scale composite tubes with different geometrical shapes for use in sacrificial cladding structures,” Polym. Test., 29, 381-396 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. A. Damodar and R. Marshall, “Design and evaluation of composite fuselage panels subjected to combined loading conditions,” J. Aircraft, 42, No. 4, 1037-1045 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Heimbs, M. Hoffmann, M. Waimer, S. Schmeer, and J. Blaurock, “Dynamic testing and modelling of composite fuselage frames and fasteners for aircraft crash simulations,” Int. J. Crashworth., 18, No. 4, 406-422 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Siromani, J. Awerbuch, and T. M. Tan, “Finite element modeling of the crushing behavior of thin-walled CFRP tubes under axial compression,” Composites: Part B, 64, 50-58 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. Mahdi and T. A. Sebaey, “An experimental investigation into crushing behavior of radially stiffened GFRP composite tubes,” Thin-Walled Struct., 76, 8-13 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Bohm, D. Weck, A. Langkamp, F. Adam, and M. Gude, “Experimental and numerical study on the axial crushing behavior of textile-reinforced thermoplastic composite tubes,” Adv. Eng. Mater., 18, No. 3, 437-443 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Palanivelu, W. V. Paepegem, J. Degrieck, D. Kakogiannis, J. V. Ackeren, D. V. Hemelrijck, J. Wastiels, and J. Vantomme, “Parametric study of crushing parameters and failure patterns of pultruded composite tubes using cohesive elements and seam, Part I: Central delamination and chamfering modelling,” Polym. Test., 29, 729-741 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    C. Mcgregor, R. Vaziri, and X. Xiao, “Finite element modelling of the progressive crushing of braided composite tubes under axial impact,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 37, 662-672 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    X. Xiao, “Modeling energy absorption with a damage mechanics based composite material model,” J. Compos. Mater., 43, 427-444 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. P. Bussadori, K. Schuffenhauer, and A. Scattina, “Modelling of CFRP crushing structures in explicit crash analysis,” Composites: Part B, 60, No. 1, 725-735 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. L. Mou, T. C. Zou, Z. Y. Feng, and J. Xie, “Crashworthiness analysis and evaluation of fuselage section with subfloor composite sinusoidal specimens,” Latin American J. Solids and Struct., 13, No. 6, 1186-1202 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. S. Lin, X. Wang, C. Q. Fang, and X. Huang, “Collapse loading and energy absorption of fiber-reinforced conical shells,” Composites: Part B, 74, 178-189 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. W. Ying, F. P. Yang, and X. Wang, “Analytical method for the axial crushing force of fiber-reinforced tapered square metal tubes,” Compos. Struct., 153, 222-233 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. Ei-hage, P. K. Mallick, and N. Zamani, “A numerical study on the quasi-static crush characteristics of square aluminum-composite hybrid tubes,” Compos. Struct., 73, No. 4, 505-514 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    L. Wang, W. Q. Liu, Y. Fang. L. Wan, and R. L. Huo, “Axial crush behavior and energy absorption capability of foam-filled GFRP tubes manufactured through vacuum assisted resin infusion process,” Thin-Walled Struct., 98, 263-273 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. Sliseris, L. Yan, and B. Kasal, “Numerical simulation and experimental verification of hollow and foam-filled flaxfabric-reinforced epoxy tubular energy absorbers subjected to crashing,” Mech. Compos. Mater., 53, No. 4, 695-710 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Y. L. Lin, Z. F. Zhang, R. Chen, Y. Li, X. J. Wen, and F. Y. Lu, “Cushioning and energy absorbing property of combined aluminum honeycomb,” Adv. Eng. Mater., 17, No. 10, 1434-1441 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    G. L. Farley, “Crash energy absorbing composite sub-floor structure,” AIAA/ASME/ASCE /AHS 27th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conf., (1986).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    C. M. Kindervater, “Energy absorption of composites as an aspect of aircraft structural crash-resistance,” Developments in the Science and Technology of Composite Materials, Springer Netherlands, Berlin, Germany, 643~651 (1990).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    M. David, “Experimental and numerical investigation of polymer composite energy absorbers under dynamic loading,” DLR Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. - Forschungsberichte, 4, 1-133 (2015).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    G. L. Farley and R. M. Jones, “Crushing characteristics of continuous fiber-reinforced composite tubes,” J. Compos. Mater., 26, 37-50 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    B. Wade, P. Feraboli, M. Osborne, and M. Rassaian, Simulating laminated composite materials using LS-DYNA material model mat54: single-element investigation,” DOT/FAA/TC, 19, No. 14, (2015).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    ESI Group, PAM-CRASH 2011 Solve Reference Manual, Volume VI, Multi-applications/physics modeling , ESI Group (2011).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    D. Siromani, J. Awerbuch, and T. M. Tan. “Finite element modeling of the crushing behavior of thin-walled CFRP tubes under axial compression,” Composites: Part B, 64, 50-58 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Civil Aircraft Airworthiness Technology CAACTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations