Mechanics of Composite Materials

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 231–244 | Cite as

Finite-Layer Method: a Unified Approach to a Numerical Analysis of Interlaminar Stresses, Large Deflections, and Delamination Stability of Composites Part 1. Linear Behavior

Article

A new method for a stress–strain analysis of layered composites, named the finite-layer method, is proposed, which is based on the consideration of each particular layer as a constituent of the entire laminate. This method serves as a unified approach to the development of new algorithms for computing stresses in composite layers, interlaminar contact stresses, large deflections, and critical buckling loads of thin-walled laminated structures with delaminations. The calculation of a laminated structure is reduced to solving a boundary-value problem for a system of first-order ordinary differential equations. The number of equations depends on the number of layers in the composite. The resolving system of differential equations is a stiff system. The stable numerical method of discrete orthogonalization is used for solving the boundary value problem. Part 1 is dedicated to the application of the proposed method to a linear analysis of free-edge stresses in composite laminates, to a study of the deformation of composite plates with delaminations and bending of composite beams with patches, and to calculations of adhesive joints.

Keywords

finite-layer method composite laminate deformation model interlaminar stresses delamination boundary-value problem stiff system of equations 

References

  1. 1.
    E. Hairer and G. Wanner, Solving Ordinary Differential Equations. II. Stiff and Differential-Algebraic Problems, Springer-Verlag, (1991).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. K. Godunov, “Numerical solution of boundary-value problems for a system of linear ordinary differential equations,” Uspekhi Matem. Nauk, 16, No. 3, 171–174 (1961).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ya. M. Grigorenko, Isotropic and Anisotropic Layered Shells of Revolution with a Variable Stiffness [in Russian], Nauk. Dumka, Kiev (1973).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ya. M. Grigorenko and A. M. Timonin, “Approach to numerical solution of boundary-value problems in the theory of shells in coordinates of general form,” Int. Appl. Mechanucs, 30, No. 4, 257–263 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ya. M. Grigorenko and A. T. Vasilenko, “Solution of problems and an analysis of the stress–strain state of anisotropic inhomogeneous shells (Review),” Prikl. Mekh., 33, No. 11, 3–38 (1997).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. N. Guz’ (ed.), Composite Mechanics. In 12 Vols. Vol. 11. Ya. M. Grigorenko, Yu. N. Shevchenko, V. G. Savchenko, et al. (eds.), Numerical Methods [in Russian], “ASK,” Kiev (2002).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ya. M. Grigorenko, “Solution of boundary-value problems on the stress state of elastic bodies of complex geometry and structure by using discrete Fourier series (Review),” Prikl. Mekh., 45, No. 5, 3–53 (2009).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. V. Karmishin, V. A. Lyaskovets, V. I. Myachenkov, and A. N. Frolov, Statics and Dynamics of Thin-Walled Shell Structures [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1975).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. I. Myachenkov (ed.), Calculations of Engineering Structures by the Finite-Element Method. Handbook [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1989).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. V. Novozhilov, Fundamentals of the Nonlinear Theory of Elasticity [in Russian], Gostekhizdat, Leningrad (1948).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Timoshenko, S. Woinowsky-Krieger, Theory of Plates and Shells, McGraw-Hill, (1959).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. F. M. da Silva, P. J. C. das Neves, R. D. Adams, and J. K. Spelt, “Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints. Part I: Literature survey,” Int. J. Adhes. Adhesives, 29, 319–330 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre CompositeRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations