Mechanics of Composite Materials

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 303–314 | Cite as

Behavior of concrete cylinders confined by a carbon composite 3. Deformability and the ultimate axial strain

  • V. Tamuzs
  • R. Tepfers
  • E. Zile
  • O. Ladnova


Results of an experimental investigation into the mechanical properties of concrete cylinders confined by a carbon-epoxy composite wrapping are presented. It is shown that, for all the con fined con crete spec i mens tested, the loading paths in the normalized stress space follow a single master curve, what ever the concrete strength and confinement intensity. At stresses in the confined concrete exceeding the strength of plain concrete, the tangent modulus was found to depend on the slope angle of the master curve and the asymptotic value of the differential Poisson ratio (the first derivative of the lateral strain with respect to the axial one). Formulas for predicting the ultimate axial strain and the tangent modulus are derived and compared with the corresponding fib (fédération internationale du béton) recommendations.


confined concrete carbon-epoxy composite ultimate strain tangent modulus 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    V. Tamuzs, R. Tepfers, Chi-Sang You, T. Rousakis, I. Repelis, V. Skruls, and U. Vilks, “Behavior of concrete cylinders confined by carbon-composite tapes and prestressed yarns. 1. Experimental data,” Mech. Compos. Mater., 42, No. 1, 13–32 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. Tamuzs, R. Tepfers, and E. Sparnins, “Behavior of concrete cylinders confined by a carbon composite. 2. Prediction of strength,” Mech. Compos. Mater., 42, No. 2, 109–118 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Park and J.-Y. Kim, “Plasticity model using multiple failure criteria for concrete in compression,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 42, 2303–2322 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Shahawy, A. Mirmiran, and T. Beitelman, “Tests and modeling of carbon-wrapped concrete columns,” Composites, Pt. B, 31, 471–480 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. De Lorenzis and R. Tepfers, “Comparative study of models on confinement of concrete cylinders with fiber-rein-forced polymer composites,” ASCE J. Compos. Construct., 7, 219–237 (August, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    fib/CEB-FIP Bulletin 14, Externally Bonded FRP Reinforcement for RC Structures. fib, Task Group 9.3 FRP Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, convener Thanasis Triantafillou, fédération internationale du béton, Lausanne (July, 2001).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ACI Committee 440.2R-02, Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Strengthening Concrete Structures, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan 48333-9094 (July, 2002).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. R. Spoelstra and G. Monti, “FRP-confined concrete model,” ASCE J. Compos. Construct., 3, No. 3, 143–150 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. Tamuzs, V. Valdmanis, U. Vilks, E. Sparnins, E Zile, O. Ladnova, K. Gylltoft, and R. Tepfers, Tests to Determine the Modulus of Elasticity for CFRP Confined Concrete Columns in Stage above the Bearing Capacity of Unconfined Concrete, Institute of Polymer Mechanics, University of Latvia, Aizkraukles St. 23, LV-1006, Riga, Latvia, and the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Structural Engineering, and Concrete Structures, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96, Göteborg, Sweden (May, 2006).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Tamuzs
    • 1
  • R. Tepfers
    • 2
  • E. Zile
    • 1
  • O. Ladnova
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Polymer MechanicsUniversity of LatviaRigaLatvia
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Structural Engineering, and Concrete StructuresChalmers University of TechnologyGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations