Carbon stocks, emissions, and aboveground productivity in restored secondary tropical peat swamp forests

  • Meli F. Saragi-SasmitoEmail author
  • Daniel Murdiyarso
  • Tania June
  • Sigit D. Sasmito
Original Article


Tropical wetlands such as peat swamp forests (PSFs) have been known globally as one of the carbon (C)-rich ecosystems. However, there is still a lack of understanding on the C cycle in PSFs, especially in association with land use and cover changes (e.g., ecosystem degradation and restoration). This study presents the C stocks, removals, and emissions dataset, as well as the determining factors from an early restoration stage of secondary tropical PSFs in Central Kalimantan. We assessed various biophysical parameters such as forest structure, above- and belowground C-stocks, aboveground primary productivity, total and heterotrophic soil respirations, and groundwater level (GWL). We found that tree density varied from 1200 to 1825 trees per hectare (ha) across the plots, whereas the mean of stand basal area was 32.86 ± 4.72 m2 ha−1. Mean ecosystem C stocks in the study site was 1752 ± 401 Mg-C ha−1, of which 93% was stored in belowground organic peat soils. A mean aboveground litterfall production of 4.6 ± 0.5 Mg-C ha−1 year−1 and biomass C sequestration through tree diameter increment with 2.7 ± 0.5 Mg-C ha−1 year−1 was obtained. We observed slightly larger portion of annual mean total soil respiration with 14.2 ± 1.1 Mg-C ha−1 year−1 than heterotrophic respiration 11.1 ± 0.9 Mg-C ha−1 year−1, emphasizing the lower contribution of autotrophic respiration from the belowground rooting system. Findings imply that further conservation management efforts through ecosystem restoration may preserve C stored and enhance C input in PSFs substantially, and could be potentially included in national climate change mitigation strategies.


Forest structure Soil Biomass Fluxes Peatland Indonesia 



The authors would like to thank the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for funding support (AID-BFS-G-11-00002) through the Sustainable Wetlands Adaptation and Mitigation Program (SWAMP) of the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), and PT. Rimba Makmur Utama and the National and Unit Policy, Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Republic of Indonesia for research permits. We also thank Kemen Austin, field assistants, and local people who helped during fieldworks. Constructive comments from Meriadec Silanpaa, Jessica Clendening, Guest editor, and two anonymous reviewers on the manuscript are highly appreciated.

Supplementary material

11027_2018_9793_MOESM1_ESM.docx (32 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 32 kb)


  1. Andriesse J (1988) Nature and management of tropical peat soils. Food & Agriculture Org, RomeGoogle Scholar
  2. Anemaet ER, Middleton BA (2013) Dendrometer bands made easy: using modified cable ties to measure incremental growth of trees. Appl Plant Sci 1:1300044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anshari GZ, Afifudin M, Nuriman M, Gusmayanti E, Arianie L, Susana R, Nusantara RW, Sugardjito J, Rafiastanto A (2010) Drainage and land use impacts on changes in selected peat properties and peat degradation in West Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. Biogeosciences 7:3403–3419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BMKG (2015) Dataset for annual temperature and precipitation. SampitGoogle Scholar
  5. Brady MA (1997) Organic matter dynamics of coastal peat deposits in Sumatra, Indonesia. Dissertation, University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  6. Broder T, Blodau C, Biester H, Knorr KH (2012) Peat decomposition records in three pristine ombrotrophic bogs in southern Patagonia. Biogeosciences 9:1479–1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlson KM, Goodman LK, May-Tobin CC (2015) Modeling relationships between water table depth and peat soil carbon loss in Southeast Asian plantations. Environ Lett 10:074006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Casson A (2001) Decentralisation of policies affecting forests and estate crops in Kotawaringin Timur District, Central Kalimantan. CIFOR, Bogor, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheyne SM, Thompson CJ, Phillips AC et al (2008) Density and population estimate of gibbons (Hylobates albibarbis) in the Sabangau catchment, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Primates 49:50–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chimner RA, Ewel KC (2005) A tropical freshwater wetland: II. Production, decomposition, and peat formation. Wet Ecol Manag 13(6):671–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donato DC, Kauffman JB, Murdiyarso D, Kurnianto S, Stidham M, Kanninen M (2011) Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nat Geosci 4:293–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaveau DL, Salim MA, Hergoualc'h K et al (2014) Major atmospheric emissions from peat fires in Southeast Asia during non-drought years: evidence from the 2013 Sumatran fires. Sci Rep 4:6112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaveau DL, Sheil D, Salim MA et al (2016) Rapid conversions and avoided deforestation: examining four decades of industrial plantation expansion in Borneo. Sci Rep 6:32017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gumbricht T, Roman-Cuesta RM, Verchot L et al (2017) An expert system model for mapping tropical wetlands and peatlands reveals South America as the largest contributor. Glob Change BiolGoogle Scholar
  15. Hergoualc’h KA, Gutiérrez-Vélez VH, Menton M, Verchot LV (2017) Characterizing degradation of palm swamp peatlands from space and on the ground: an exploratory study in the Peruvian Amazon. For Ecol Manag 393:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hergoualc’h KA, Verchot LV (2011) Stocks and fluxes of carbon associated with land use change in Southeast Asian tropical peatlands: a review. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 25:2Google Scholar
  17. Hergoualc’h KA, Verchot LV (2012) Changes in soil CH4 fluxes from the conversion of tropical peat swamp forests: a meta-analysis. J Integr Environ Sci 9:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hergoualc’h KA, Verchot LV (2013) Greenhouse gas emission factors for land use and land-use change in Southeast Asian peatlands. Mitig Adapt Strateg Gl 19:789–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hiraishi T, Krug T, Tanabe K et al (2014) 2013 supplement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: wetlands. IPCC, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  20. Holden J (2005) Peatland hydrology and carbon release: why small-scale process matters. Philos T Roy Soc A 363:2891–2913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hooijer A, Page S, Canadell J et al (2010) Current and future CO2 emissions from drained peatlands in Southeast Asia. Biogeosciences 7:1505–1514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huijnen V, Wooster M, Kaiser J et al (2016) Fire carbon emissions over maritime southeast Asia in 2015 largest since 1997. Sci Rep, 6Google Scholar
  23. Joosten H, Couwenberg J (2009) Are emission reductions from peatlands MRV-able? Wetlands International, Ede:15Google Scholar
  24. Koh LP, Miettinen J, Liew SC, Ghazoul J (2011) Remotely sensed evidence of tropical peatland conversion to oil palm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:5127–5132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kolka RK, Murdiyarso D, Kauffman JB, Birdsey RA (2016) Tropical wetlands, climate, and land-use change: adaptation and mitigation opportunities. Wetl Ecol Manag 24:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kotowska MM, Leuschner C, Triadiati T, Meriem S, Hertel D (2015) Quantifying above- and belowground biomass carbon loss with forest conversion in tropical lowlands of Sumatra (Indonesia). Glob Chang Biol 21:3620–3634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krüger J, Leifeld J, Glatzel S et al (2015) Biogeochemical indicators of peatland degradation—a case study of a temperate bog in northern Germany. Biogeosciences 12:2861–2871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuhry P, Vitt DH (1996) Fossil carbon/nitrogen ratios as a measure of peat decomposition. Ecology 77:271–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kurnianto S, Warren M, Talbot J, Kauffman B, Murdiyarso D, Frolking S (2015) Carbon accumulation of tropical peatlands over millennia: a modeling approach. Glob Chang Biol 21:431–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Limpens J, Berendse F, Blodau C, Canadell JG, Freeman C, Holden J, Roulet N, Rydin H, Schaepman-Strub G (2008) Peatlands and the carbon cycle: from local processes to global implications—a synthesis. Biogeosciences 5:1475–1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Malhi Y, Farfán-Amézquita F, Doughty CE et al (2014) The productivity, metabolism and carbon cycle of two lowland tropical forest plots in south-western Amazonia, Peru. Plant Ecol Divers 7:85–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Malmer N, Holm E (1984) Variation in the C/N-quotient of peat in relation to decomposition rate and age determination with 210 Pb. Oikos 43:171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Manuri S, Brack C, Nugroho NP, Hergoualc’h K, Novita N, Dotzauer H, Verchot L, Putra CAS, Widyasari E (2014) Tree biomass equations for tropical peat swamp forest ecosystems in Indonesia. For Ecol Manag 334:241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marthews T, Metcalfe D, Malhi Y et al (2012) Measuring tropical forest carbon allocation and cycling: a RAINFOR-GEM field manual for intensive census plots. Manual, Global Ecosystems Monitoring 2:2Google Scholar
  35. Miettinen J, Shi C, Liew SC (2012) Two decades of destruction in Southeast Asia’s peat swamp forests. Front Ecol Environ 10:124–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mishra S, Lee W, Hooijer A et al (2014) Microbial and metabolic profiling reveal strong influence of water table and land-use patterns on classification of degraded tropical peatlands. Biogeosciences 11:1727–1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miyamoto K, Kohyama TS, Rahajoe JS et al (2016) Forest structure and productivity of tropical heath and peatland forests. In: Miyamoto K, Noboyuki T (eds) Tropical peatland ecosystems, springer, pp 151–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MoE (2010) Indonesia second National Communication under the United Nations framework convention on climate change (UNFCCC). Ministry of Environment, Jakarta, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  39. Murdiyarso D, Hergoualc'h KA, Verchot LV (2010a) Opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in tropical peatlands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:19655–19660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Murdiyarso D, Donato D, Kauffman JB et al (2010b) Carbon storage in mangrove and peatland ecosystems: a preliminary account from plots in Indonesia. CIFOR, Bogor, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  41. Murdiyarso D, Kauffman JB, Verchot LV (2013) Climate change mitigation strategies should include tropical wetlands. Carbon Manag 4:491–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Murdiyarso D, Purbopuspito J, Kauffman JB, Warren MW, Sasmito SD, Donato DC, Manuri S, Krisnawati H, Taberima S, Kurnianto S (2015) The potential of Indonesian mangrove forests for global climate change mitigation. Nat Clim Chang 5:1089–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ong CSP, Juan JC, Yule CM (2014) Litterfall production and chemistry of Koompassia malaccensis and Shorea uliginosa in a tropical peat swamp forest: plant nutrient regulation and climate relationships. Trees 29:527–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Page SE, Baird AJ (2016) Peatlands and global change: response and resilience. Annu Rev Environ Resour 41:35–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Page SE, Hosciło A, Wösten H et al (2008) Restoration ecology of lowland tropical peatlands in Southeast Asia: current knowledge and future research directions. Ecosystems 12:888–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Page SE, Rieley JO, Banks CJ (2011) Global and regional importance of the tropical peatland carbon pool. Glob Chang Biol 17:798–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Page SE, Rieley JO, Shotyk Ø et al (1999) Interdependence of peat and vegetation in a tropical peat swamp forest. Philos T Roy Soc B 354:1885–1897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Suwarna U (2012) Estimation of total carbon stocks in soil and vegetation of tropical peat forest in Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 18:18–128Google Scholar
  49. Wakhid N, Hirano T, Okimoto Y, Nurzakiah S, Nursyamsi D (2017) Soil carbon dioxide emissions from a rubber plantation on tropical peat. Sci Total Environ 581-582:857–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Warren MW, Frolking S, Dai Z et al (2016) Impacts of land use, restoration, and climate change on tropical peat carbon stocks in the twenty-first century: implications for climate mitigation. Mitig Adapt Strat Gl 22(7):1041–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Warren MW, Hergoualc'h KA, Kauffman JB et al (2017) An appraisal of Indonesia’s immense peat carbon stock using national peatland maps: uncertainties and potential losses from conversion. Carbon Balance Manag 12:12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Warren MW, Kauffman JB, Murdiyarso D, Anshari G, Hergoualc'h K, Kurnianto S, Purbopuspito J, Gusmayanti E, Afifudin M, Rahajoe J, Alhamd L, Limin S, Iswandi A (2012) A cost-efficient method to assess carbon stocks in tropical peat soil. Biogeosciences 9:4477–4485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wijedasa LS, Jauhiainen J, Kononen M et al (2017) Denial of long-term issues with agriculture on tropical peatlands will have devastating consequences. Glob Change Biol 23:977–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wösten JHM, Clymans E, Page SE, Rieley JO, Limin SH (2008) Peat–water interrelationships in a tropical peatland ecosystem in Southeast Asia. Catena 73:212–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meli F. Saragi-Sasmito
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Daniel Murdiyarso
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tania June
    • 1
  • Sigit D. Sasmito
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Bogor Agricultural UniversityDepartment of Geophysics and MeteorologyBogorIndonesia
  2. 2.Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)BogorIndonesia
  3. 3.Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods (RIEL)DarwinAustralia

Personalised recommendations