Gridded estimates of CO2 emissions: uncertainty as a function of grid size
- 188 Downloads
A crucial aspect of constructing a gridded model of anthropogenic fossil fuel CO2 (FFCO2) emissions involves careful consideration of uncertainty. Both the spatial resolution of the emissions estimates (grid scale) and the selection of proxy data to represent the spatial distribution of emissions, plus the quality of data on point sources of emissions, have important impacts on uncertainty. In earlier papers, we explored the uncertainties associated with grid selection and the available data on large point sources. In this work CO2 emissions data are spatially distributed using population density as the selected proxy, using three different treatments of large point sources, and with five levels of grid resolution (1o, 2o, 3o, 4o, and 5o). The methods of calculating uncertainty associated with grid size, proxy selection, and reported point-source emissions data are presented, with particular attention being drawn to grid size selection. We find that as the resolution becomes coarser, relative uncertainty (total uncertainty as a percentage of total emissions) at the grid cell level decreases. Relative uncertainty in most grid cells decreases as the portion of emissions attributed to specific point sources increases. Good data on large point sources is very important for spatially explicit emissions inventories.
KeywordsCO2 emissions Gridded inventories Emissions inventories as a function of scale U.S. CO2 emissions
This work was aided by support from the Research Institute for Environment, Energy, and Economics at Appalachian State University. We are indebted to Rostyslav Bun for extremely insightful and constructive comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Suggestions from two anonymous reviewers have contributed significantly.
- Andres RJ, Boden TA, Bréon F–M, Ciais P, Davis S, Erickson D, Gregg JS, Jacobson A, Marland G, Miller J, Oda T, Olivier JGJ, Raupach MR, Rayner P, Treanton K (2012) A synthesis of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel combustion. Biogeosciences 9(5):1845–1871. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1845-2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- CARMA (2016) Carbon Monitoring for Action, www.CARMA.org
- NIST (2015) Measuring smokestack emissions accurately, National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, November 23, 2015. Available at https://www.nist.gov/newsevents/news/2015/11/measuring-smokestack-emissions-accurately
- Singer AM, Branham M, Hutchins MG, Welker J, Woodard DL, Badurek CA, Ruseva T, Marland E, Marland G (2014) The role of CO2 emissions from large point sources in emissions totals, responsibility, and policy. Environ Sci Policy 44:190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau (2011) Population Distribution and Change: 2000–2010, 2010 Census Briefs, U.S. Census Burreau, Washington D.C. Available at http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-01.pdf
- U.S. Department of Energy/Energy Information Administration (2013) Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions at the State Level. U.S. DOE/EIA, Washington, D.C. Available at: http://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/state/analysis/ Google Scholar
- U.S. E.P.A (2014) Clean Energy: eGRID, Ninth Edition With 2010 Data. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-resources/egrid/ Google Scholar