Mitigation of CO2 emissions from the road passenger transport sector in Bahrain

  • M. AlSabbagh
  • Y. L. Siu
  • A. Guehnemann
  • J. Barrett
Original Article

Abstract

There is much optimism that the 2015 Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention will yield an agreement on mitigation of climate change, to become effective in 2020. In this context, Bahrain represents a developing country with insufficient data to assess mitigation opportunities: its per capita carbon emissions rank among the world’s highest, yet there has been no research on the reduction potential of its rapidly growing transport sector. We examine this reduction potential and the costs of various mitigation measures and, further, explore barriers and the view of policymakers and experts. Potential benefits of combined mitigation scenarios are also identified based on their acceptability. We adopt a modified participatory method to develop the scenarios, using the long-range energy alternative planning (LEAP) modelling system, and find that an integrated policy approach can deliver a 23 % reduction in carbon dioxide emissions, costing 108 United States dollars per avoided metric tonne, with politically acceptable scenarios. Better performance, however, would require less acceptable approaches. These findings are significant for decision-making in Bahrain and other Gulf Cooperation Council countries; national target preparation and the setting of fuel economy standards should be begun promptly. We offer lessons to other developing countries on the timely regulation of technical specifications and numbers of passenger vehicles. Participatory approaches to the assessment of mitigation measures can advance environmentally effective, economically feasible and politically acceptable scenarios. The global community can use these results to provide necessary technical and financial assistance to developing countries.

Keywords

Bahrain CO2 emissions LEAP Mitigation scenarios Passenger vehicles Policymakers 

References

  1. Ahanchian M, Biona J (2014) Energy demand, emissions forecasts and mitigation strategies modeled over a medium-range horizon: the case of the land transportation. Energy Policy 66:615–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alsabbagh M, Siu YL, Barrett J, Abdel Gelil I (2013) CO2 emissions and fuel consumption of passenger vehicles in Bahrain: current status and future scenarios. The SRI working papers. http://www.see.leeds.ac.uk/research/sri/working-papers. Cited 7 Oct 2014
  3. Ashina S, Fujino J, Masui T, Ehara T, Hibino G (2012) A roadmap towards a low-carbon society in Japan using backcasting methodology: feasible pathways for achieving an 80 % reduction in CO2 emissions by 2050. Energy Policy 41:584–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartlett J, Kotrlik J, Higgins C (2001) Organizational research: determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Inf Technol Learn Perform J 19(1):43–50Google Scholar
  5. Borba B, Lucena A, Rathmann R, Costa I, Nogueira L, Rochedo P et al (2012) Energy-related climate change mitigation in Brazil: potential, abatement costs and associated policies. Energy Policy 49:430–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chakravarty S, Chikkatur A, Coninck H, Pacala S, Socolow R, Tavoni M (2009) Sharing global CO2 emission reductions among one billion high emitters. PNAS 106(29):11884–11888. doi:10.1073/pnas.0905232106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colorado Energy Office (2012) Experiences with Compressed Natural Gas in Colorado Vehicle Fleets. http://www.afdc.energy.gov/uploads/publication/CNG_Colorado_Case_Study___Appendices.pdf. Cited 20 Dec 2014
  8. Dedinec A, Markovska N, Taseska V, Duic N (2013) Assessment of climate change mitigation potential of the Macedonian transport sector. Energy 57:177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions) (2000) Public participation in making local environmental decisions. http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/pp/ecases/handbook.pdf. Cited 26 Feb 2015
  10. Dhakal S (2003) Implications of transportation policies on energy and environment in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Energy Policy 31:1493–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghanadan R, Koomey J (2005) Using energy scenarios to explore alternative energy pathways in California. Energy Policy 33:1117–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gulf Daily News (2015) Bahrain oil reserves set at 632.5m barrels. http://www.gulf-daily-news.com/NewsDetails.aspx?storyid=401118. Cited 3 May 2015
  13. He L, Chen Y (2013) Thou shalt drive electric and hybrid vehicles: scenario analysis on energy saving and emission mitigation for road transportation sector in China. Transp Policy 25:30–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heaps C (2008) An introduction to LEAP. http://www.energycommunity.org/documents/LEAPIntro.pdf. Cited 11 Aug 2014
  15. IEA (International Energy Agency) (2013) Key world energy statistics 2013.http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/KeyWorld2013.pdf. Cited 11 Aug 2014
  16. IEA (International Energy Agency) (2014) Glossary. http://www.iea.org/aboutus/glossary/e/.Cited 11 Aug 2014
  17. IPCC (The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Climate change 2007: mitigation. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. IPCC (The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2014) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx JC (eds) Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IRF (International Road Federation) (2011) IRF world road statistics 2011. IRF, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  20. Jorgensen F, Dargay J (2006) Inferring price elasticities of car use and moral costs of driving without a license. http://www.tsu.ox.ac.uk/pubs/1019-jorgensen-dargay.pdf. Cited 20 Dec 2014
  21. Justen A, Fearnley N, Givoni M, Macmillen J (2014) A process for designing policy packaging: ideals and realities. Transp Res A Policy 60:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kok R, Annema J, Wee B (2011) Cost-effectiveness of greenhouse gas mitigation in transport: a review of methodological approaches and their impact. Energy Policy 39:7776–7793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lahn G, Preston F (2013) Targets to promote energy savings in the gulf cooperation council states. Energy Strateg Rev 2(1):19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lazarus M, Erickson P, Chandler C, Daudon M, Donegan S, Gallivan F, Ang-olson J (2011) Getting to zero: a pathway to a carbon neutral Seattle.http://www.seattle.gov/Documents/Departments/OSE/CN_Seattle_Report_May_2011.pdf. Cited 26 Feb 2015
  25. Ministry of Finance (2013) Total state revenue and expenditure for the fiscal years 2011 and 2012. https://www.mof.gov.bh/ShowDataFile.asp?rid=2634. Cited 28 Sep 2014
  26. Palencia J, Furubayashi T, Nakata T (2014) Techno-economic assessment of lightweight and zero emission vehicles deployment in the passenger car fleet of developing countries. Appl Energy 123:129–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pan L, Xie Y, Li W (2013) An analysis of emission reduction of chief air pollutants and greenhouse gases in Beijing based on the LEAP model. Procedia Env Sci 18:347–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. PMEW (General Commission for the Protection of Marine Resources, Environment and Wildlife) (2012) Bahrain’s second national communication. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/bhrnc2.pdf. Cited 28 Sep 2014
  29. Pongthanaisawan J, Sorapipatana C (2013) Greenhouse gas emissions from Thailand’s transport sector: trends and mitigation options. Appl Energy 101:288–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rogan F, Dennehy E, Daly H, Howley M, Gallachóir B (2011) Impacts of an emission based private car taxation policy—first year ex-post analysis. Transp Res A Policy 45:583–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmid E, Knopf B (2012) Ambitious mitigation scenarios for Germany: a participatory approach. Energy Policy 51:662–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shabbir R, Ahmad S (2010) Monitoring urban transport air pollution and energy demand in Rawalpindi and Islamabad using LEAP model. Energy 35:2323–2332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sharma R, Manzie C, Bessede M, Crawford R, Brear M (2013) Conventional, hybrid and electric vehicles for Australian driving conditions. Part 2: life cycle CO2 emissions. Transport Res C-Emer 28:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Small K, Dender K (2007) Long run trends in transport demand, fuel price elasticities and implications of the oil outlook for transport policy. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5kzbxsq6j8kl.pdf?expires=1419074788&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=F0B10FCD35CB485930A8FEC6B424E073. Cited 20 Dec 2014
  35. Stockholm Environment Institute (2014) Help for LEAP: stock analysis calculations. http://www.energycommunity.org/WebHelpPro/Demand/Stock_Analysis_Calculations.htm. Cited 20 Dec 2014
  36. Suganthi L, Aamuel A (2012) Energy models for demand forecasting—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:1223–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. SYSTRA-MVA (2008) Integrated transport strategy for the Kingdom of Bahrain: results of consultations. Final report, volume 2. Internal reportGoogle Scholar
  38. Thamsiriroj T, Smyth H, Murphy J (2011) A roadmap for the introduction of gaseous transport fuel: a case study for renewable natural gas in Ireland. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:4642–4651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tuominen A, Tapio P, Varho V, Jarvi T, Banister D (2014) Pluralistic backcasting: integrating multiple visions with policy packages for transport climate policy. Futures 60:41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang Y, Gu A, Zhang A (2011) Recent development of energy supply and demand in China, and energy sector prospects through 2030. Energy Policy 39:6745–6759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whyatt G (2010) Issues affecting adoption of natural gas fuel in light- and heavy-duty vehicles.http://s3.amazonaws.com/zanran_storage/www.pnl.gov/ContentPages/184758856.pdf. Cited 20 Dec 2014
  42. Windecker A, Ruder A (2013) Fuel economy, cost, and greenhouse gas results for alternative fuel vehicles in 2011. Transp Res D-Tr E23:34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. World Bank (2014a) CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC. Cited 11 Aug 2014
  44. World Bank (2014b) Pump price for diesel fuel (US$ per liter). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EP.PMP.DESL.CD. Cited 11 Aug 2014
  45. World Energy Council (2015) CO2 emissions of transport per capita. http://www.wec-indicators.enerdata.eu/transport-co2-emissions-per-capita.html. Cited 3 May 2015

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. AlSabbagh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Y. L. Siu
    • 1
  • A. Guehnemann
    • 3
  • J. Barrett
    • 1
  1. 1.Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and EnvironmentUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.Environmental Management ProgrammeArabian Gulf UniversityManamaBahrain
  3. 3.Institute for Transport StudiesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations